KFC from history till now always full of event
STOCK MARKET DISCUSSION V67, Alex's 1447 or 1388.....
STOCK MARKET DISCUSSION V67, Alex's 1447 or 1388.....
|
|
Nov 29 2010, 03:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
KFC from history till now always full of event
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 29 2010, 03:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(panasonic88 @ Nov 29 2010, 03:45 PM) Question. They all are bidding the price on QSR only, aka offer the price to QSR shareholders, So far QSR privatize price bidding war only benefitted QSR & its warrant, why KFC & Kulim are being sell down? KFC and Kulim shareholders are not benefiting directly, especially KFC. or technically, none of business to KFC. While for Kulim, it may be like killing the golden goose. |
|
|
Nov 29 2010, 04:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
KLCI drop more than 11 points this morning,
closing green again? |
|
|
Nov 29 2010, 04:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
|
|
|
Nov 29 2010, 04:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
|
|
|
Nov 29 2010, 04:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 29 2010, 04:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
|
|
|
Nov 29 2010, 05:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
|
|
|
Nov 29 2010, 05:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2010, 10:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
PChem reported 7 cents per Q EPS only.
Valuation seems pretty high at RM5.40 with 7 cents per Q. |
|
|
Nov 30 2010, 11:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2010, 11:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(GregPG01 @ Nov 30 2010, 11:34 AM) i checked that price was uptrend even during the boardroom tussle . is it correct ? Boardroom tussle surely price shoot up, as the more shares you have, the "larger" your voice.Added on November 30, 2010, 11:35 amKulim .... you're going the wrong direction Just like last time Palmco both party want it, Sime and IOI go to market to "sapu" shares out there. |
|
|
Nov 30 2010, 11:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(BrendaChee @ Nov 30 2010, 11:46 AM) I received my londonbis notice today, wrong name, wrong number of share . This is second case liao http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/1657852Wrong bank, and wrong account number..luckily the e-dividend that bank into my bank amount correct. It is so scary to me. what kind of stupid mistakes? May be company registrar making mistake already. Can't be 2 similar case. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2010, 12:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(teehk_tee @ Nov 30 2010, 11:54 AM) i uh.. had the exact same problem yesterday. called the registrar today, they said printing error, will resend. Print wrongly, and bank in wrongly??Wah, everyone must check their e-dividend registered acc, see got Santa sending you some free dividend or not? Btw, who is the registrar of the company? This post has been edited by cherroy: Nov 30 2010, 12:05 PM |
|
|
Nov 30 2010, 12:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
This is serious error.
|
|
|
Nov 30 2010, 03:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(StupidGuyPlayComp @ Nov 30 2010, 03:04 PM) 1 time pain better than long period pain Only bank reserves being hiked. Even at 18.5%, it doesn't stop banks from lending aggressively. It is long overdue, and the rest, like Malaysia are suffering inflation problem, aka inflation being exported to the rest of country. |
|
|
Nov 30 2010, 04:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(StupidGuyPlayComp @ Nov 30 2010, 03:52 PM) fundamental counter no ppl discuss already, hibernating Only got excitement twice a year during announcement of good profit and good dividend time. |
|
|
Nov 30 2010, 04:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(protonw @ Nov 30 2010, 04:01 PM) Aiyoh, now you brought up, I think I have the same problem liao. Wah, so many people.At first i thought was the wrong people in my address as the shareholding and bank account were not mine and that person just happened to have the same surname as me... now what.... Wrong across all the shareholders? I wonder thestar and other media will report this matter or not. |
|
|
Nov 30 2010, 06:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(jasontoh @ Nov 30 2010, 05:48 PM) Not sure how to explain to you in simple terms but just for your info, don't always think 1+1=2 in merging. What I'm trying to say, merging not necessary a good thing, could be just neutral or sometimes it could be bad. You could have bought at the price where people bake in the merging, that's why now going back to south. Yup, merger is not 100% must be good. This especially for shareholders that initial hold the better company before the merger one.Not sure it is good to cut loss or hold, as all the while I never like MRCB before, so did not really do any research on this stock. Sime is the good example that merger, doesn't yield 1+1+1+1 = 4. KLCI had reached all time high, CPO is also quite high, other plantation stocks are hitting all time high, at least 30-50% higher than before, but Sime share price is still lagging. |
|
|
Dec 1 2010, 12:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(teehk_tee @ Dec 1 2010, 12:06 AM) ah.. i'll attach a steel industry research paper by HLIB when i get the time, but right now there's still a significant risk in the steel sector because China's demand isn't picking up yet, steel input prices are still rising, and theres a possible oversupply situation. Economy activities are not fully recovered despite good GDP number showing. they picked CSCSteel as best play in the sector. For industrial product, in most industry, margin is pretty tight and facing inflation on cost side quite severe, and ability passing down the cost is somehow unclear as demand is not strong enough. Even oil refiner like Shell are facing profit margin squeezing. This post has been edited by cherroy: Dec 1 2010, 12:58 AM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0449sec
0.19
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 11:09 PM |