Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
13 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The Official Nikon Discussion thread V1, All under one roof !

views
     
TSKTCY
post Nov 22 2010, 09:18 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
The EVIL System drool.gif

user posted image
TSKTCY
post Nov 22 2010, 09:23 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
35mm is good on DX. But f/1.8 version, output not up to what I want tongue.gif
f/2D way way better.
TSKTCY
post Nov 22 2010, 09:26 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(celciuz @ Nov 22 2010, 09:22 AM)
Different quality! I compared before... the Canon one is like thinner :S.
D7000? Wohoo~! Well, was looking at friend's D7000 photo. Pretty impressive despite using just the 18-105 to shoot indoor without flash. LOL. The color output from D7000 is really vibrant! Love it~!
Ahh, this shall serve as my second body (or third when I upgrade to FX) tongue.gif. But the color is a no no to me ._. Why can't they go matte black with the red 'underwear' at the grip tongue.gif.
*
My friend pair with 17-55. DIE ! Video some more sweat.gif

QUOTE(MichaelJohn @ Nov 22 2010, 09:23 AM)
Lol~
Give it to Lady Gaga or someone >_<
*
That's just a prototype.

QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Nov 22 2010, 09:24 AM)
I see.... 116 mm ady so nice bokeh rclxms.gif  I know is strobe, I juz wondering how many lightnings he used, as he shared in his fb link.
Any info of the evil camera?  blink.gif
*
No idea.
More info from link below.
http://www.truphotos.com/2010/11/22/nikon-...-model-cameras/
TSKTCY
post Nov 22 2010, 09:31 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
Guess it's not. Compact DSLR tongue.gif
TSKTCY
post Nov 22 2010, 09:43 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(MichaelJohn @ Nov 22 2010, 09:36 AM)
mmmm.... While waiting for SB-700 to arrive in shops , better to go straight to SB-900?
*
Apparently, SB-700 GN number lower than SB-600.
SB-700 GN only 28. sweat.gif
http://speedlights.net/2010/09/16/nikon-sb...600-and-sb-900/

This post has been edited by KTCY: Nov 22 2010, 09:46 AM
TSKTCY
post Nov 22 2010, 09:46 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(MichaelJohn @ Nov 22 2010, 09:45 AM)
Seriously ? hmm.gif
Wow...I thought it be same or abit higher than the BS-600  yawn.gif
*
Read this.
http://speedlights.net/2010/09/16/nikon-sb...600-and-sb-900/
TSKTCY
post Nov 22 2010, 09:58 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(yushin @ Nov 22 2010, 09:53 AM)
I have SB900 but I still want to get SB700 due to its smaller size.
*
I have SB-800. I want nothing.

QUOTE
In terms of Guide Numbers, things haven't changed a lot. For FX cameras, the GNs tend to be very slightly lower for the SB-900 than for the SB-800 for equivalent settings, though the ability to focus the flash head and the 200mm head position can give you a boost if you're not trying to light really wide areas and prefer to limit the flash coverage. Also, there's a bit more power at the very widest setting, probably due to changes in the diffuser. From a practical, functional level, I'd rate this all as a wash. The ability to shape the beam is actually more beneficial in actual shooting than a bit more power would be, in my opinion. Bottom line: don't expect a light level boost over an SB-800.


tongue.gif

http://bythom.com/sb900review.htm

This post has been edited by KTCY: Nov 22 2010, 09:59 AM
TSKTCY
post Nov 22 2010, 10:01 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(zstan @ Nov 22 2010, 09:59 AM)
malaysia always get the good things last.  yawn.gif  yawn.gif  yawn.gif
*
laugh.gif

QUOTE(yushin @ Nov 22 2010, 09:59 AM)
Post and reply as much as I can see how long will it take to reach V2.
Got new feature with SB700? I tot its just an upgrade of sb600 with master function...

With the iso6400 of D700 and 24 F1.4, flash is not really that needed at night already. I mostly use my sb900 for fill flash only which I think is too big and heavy.
*
Actually I disappointed with D700 low light condition. with 1.4 also disappointed sad.gif

TSKTCY
post Nov 22 2010, 10:05 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
Only lens I want now, 35mm f/1.4 and maybe 24mm.
The only body I want now, 5dMKII features but D3s noise control or even better than D3s !
TSKTCY
post Nov 22 2010, 10:10 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Nov 22 2010, 10:07 AM)
Later nobody wanna buy the SB700, since the SB900 is around 1.5k+, wonder where would the SB700 price belongs. 1.2k, rather add 300+ to get SB900,  yawn.gif
*
RRP 1,199 rolleyes.gif

QUOTE(MichaelJohn @ Nov 22 2010, 10:07 AM)
Im just looking for a good wide angle lens...
but woooo
14-24mm f/2.8  drool.gif  poisoning me  laugh.gif
*
Bulky tho sharp even at 14mm f/2.8 ! drool.gif
TSKTCY
post Nov 22 2010, 10:28 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(MichaelJohn @ Nov 22 2010, 10:20 AM)
6.8k
*
14-24 6.8k? I sell you 6.1k can already..


Added on November 22, 2010, 10:29 am
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Nov 22 2010, 10:21 AM)
1 question that stays in my head for very long time..... There is rear mount filters? Or how does they add filter for those larger than 77mm? i.e 200mm F2 those big head bazooka
*
QUOTE(MichaelJohn @ Nov 22 2010, 10:26 AM)
I believe their custom made just for those and not mass produced...
Well from Ive read from a lens magazine not too long ago~
Forgot what magazine was that
*
rear filter..

This post has been edited by KTCY: Nov 22 2010, 10:29 AM
TSKTCY
post Nov 22 2010, 10:34 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(MichaelJohn @ Nov 22 2010, 10:32 AM)
6.1K already used or what?
I got that price from shop at stock ler  hmm.gif
*
Brand new la. I where got sell used unit..
TSKTCY
post Nov 22 2010, 10:50 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(yushin @ Nov 22 2010, 10:48 AM)
I am fine with the result I got from D700 ISO6400 + 24 1.4.
I would be happier if nikon can come out with D3s sensor on D700 body + flip LCD like D5k.  rclxms.gif
*
Both my friend and I disappointed actually.
TSKTCY
post Nov 22 2010, 11:32 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(adriancs @ Nov 22 2010, 11:18 AM)
If even that makes you disappointed... wondering what would make you happy.
*
D3s laugh.gif
TSKTCY
post Nov 22 2010, 01:14 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(MichaelJohn @ Nov 22 2010, 11:36 AM)
16k Body , if dun happy , you have no heart in photography...LOL
laugh.gif
*
Not really. LEICA is something in my mind sweat.gif
TSKTCY
post Nov 22 2010, 01:23 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
Removed tongue.gif

This post has been edited by KTCY: Nov 22 2010, 01:25 PM
TSKTCY
post Nov 22 2010, 01:34 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
There will be something tomorrow brows.gif
Stay tuned.
TSKTCY
post Nov 22 2010, 01:41 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
Can't tell anything just yet. Official announcement tomorrow biggrin.gif
TSKTCY
post Nov 22 2010, 01:45 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(celciuz @ Nov 22 2010, 01:43 PM)
Lens still okay, still can use for motorsport!
No, the Sony 70200 is not a CZ.
Haha, well somehow I'm addicted to fast lens now!
*
I sense another prime freak in the making flex.gif
Welcome to my club.
TSKTCY
post Nov 22 2010, 01:57 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(celciuz @ Nov 22 2010, 01:50 PM)
Ahh, sounds like poison >_<
I like fast lens. But I still like zoom's versatility tongue.gif. But nowadays I prefer the 85mm over to 70200 unless I really need the extra range LOL.
*
Seriously feel that 85mm should not in your bag. 24mm should tongue.gif


13 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0368sec    0.73    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 03:08 PM