Nikon D90 V10, V10 but D90 still going strong
|
|
 Nov 9 2010, 01:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
 
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again 
|
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Nov 9 2010, 01:45 PM) 17-70 is a macro? I'm planning to buy a Nikkor prime and then later save money on a Sigma tele. Now want to play with portrait first. I call it close-up instead of macro.. Portrait prime? 135mm f/2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 01:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
King of bokeh is 200mm f/2 la
 |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 02:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
Tested and I'm dead, so dead !
|
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 02:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(Bliz @ Nov 9 2010, 02:40 PM) A 50mm F/1.4 lens is a very good portrait lens for DX sensor, if u dun mind the weight and cost may I suggest the 70-200Vr2 VR2   Bokeh for portrait. Fuhyo ! |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 03:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
I don't shoot at f/1.4. Usually step down to f/2.
And seeing that, I might as well sell off the f/1.4  |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 03:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
My f2 serve me very well. I don't need any 50mm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 04:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Nov 9 2010, 04:13 PM) But too bad the bokeh is just so-so when compared to the 85mm f/1.4G.LOL agreed. Shoot at f/1.4 more mah.. bokeh power xD.  |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 04:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
Nikkor la.
|
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 04:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
If you know how to use it won't be shallow..
|
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 06:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
11-16 not that practical. All the way wide only
 |
|
|
Nov 10 2010, 07:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(Isepunye @ Nov 9 2010, 08:08 PM) errr are u sure? If compare with 17-55, sorry way too dull.QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Nov 9 2010, 08:28 PM) Will the price of D90 go down when D7000 is released? Nope. |
|
|
Nov 10 2010, 08:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
VR1 petal is the nicest
  |
|
|
Nov 10 2010, 09:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
No idea. I tried to put VR1 on D700. Vignette is very very minor actually. Near to none. I guess it should be fine for me to keep the VR 1 even I'm on FF.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 10 2010, 10:44 AM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(Bliz @ Nov 10 2010, 09:05 AM) Corner softness shall be more pronounced but then it's not so critical for a telelens i guess Exactly. Corner softness is ok for me, at least. but when people are paying a lot for a lens they expect perfection |
|
|
Nov 10 2010, 01:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Nov 10 2010, 12:13 PM) @celciuz For me, 105 and 135.I never study the notes this time  Between the 4 lens, have to select 2. i. 50mm ii. 85mm iii. 105mm iv. 135mm A. i and ii B. ii and iii C. iii and iv D. i and iv I think is B, because 50mm is called standard lens already mah, 135mm pulak too far QUOTE(celciuz @ Nov 10 2010, 01:11 PM) There is a 105mm f/2 DC too. One of the lensQUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Nov 10 2010, 01:31 PM)  |
|
|
Nov 10 2010, 02:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Nov 10 2010, 02:13 PM) Meaning 70200 2.8 is perfect for potrait. Covers 85, 105, 135, 200 with lovely sharpness already Heavy ! |
|
|
Nov 10 2010, 02:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
I prefer swapping lens
Prime still my favourite all time lens |
|
|
Nov 10 2010, 05:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(freddy manson @ Nov 10 2010, 03:51 PM) so no need the 70200 loh Thinking to sell QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Nov 10 2010, 04:28 PM) i jz nid a small bag for basic gear onli... D90 mount with 17-55 ? my 7 million fit nicely with lots of space for more lens even with 70-200 as i stated above... not more den dat... will upgrade later if i hav enuf money to go for zoom lens... so basically jz nid to fit all d setup i mention onli... compact and easi is my priority for all d setup i mention... not for future... |
|
|
Nov 11 2010, 07:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
I use it straight away at wedding. And 8 pcs last me the whole day
 p/s : I got new toy today |
|
|
Nov 11 2010, 07:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
Tardang !
 |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0301sec
 0.83
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 06:38 PM |
Quote