QUOTE(crisboy @ Oct 18 2010, 01:41 PM)
arrrrkkkkk pui!!
Think and see nice guys better or Jerk better? THINK la girls.. Use your brain...
You want PAIN or you want to be like Queen?? XD
Nice guys = Treat you like queen give everything you want and love you the most.. When danger comes he protect you even he is small and useless ATLEAST HE PROTECTED YOU!!!
Jerk = Treat you like slave .. maybe will hit you beat you, even worst sell you off!! Ask you for money, no money beat you up. IF GOT DANGER COMES "Wohooo I RUN FIRST!!!" you die your problem..
I find it rather appalling that you have to classify everything into both ends of the extreme without regard to the overall spectrum.Think and see nice guys better or Jerk better? THINK la girls.. Use your brain...
You want PAIN or you want to be like Queen?? XD
Nice guys = Treat you like queen give everything you want and love you the most.. When danger comes he protect you even he is small and useless ATLEAST HE PROTECTED YOU!!!
Jerk = Treat you like slave .. maybe will hit you beat you, even worst sell you off!! Ask you for money, no money beat you up. IF GOT DANGER COMES "Wohooo I RUN FIRST!!!" you die your problem..
There has to be a distinction here. There isn't such thing as a nice guy or bad boy at all. These are pseudo-type guys that only exist in fiction. What a girl says when she means a nice guy is that he is a pathetic doormat. Yes, nice does not mean he gives to charity, takes care of orphans during his free time and treats her nice. All girls would KILL for a guy like that. When she means nice she means you are putting yourself below her and below your peers(in certain cases). Basically, you are nothing but a tool for someone else's pleasure or happiness.
Then comes the jerk who has little regard for the girl or treats the girl badly. This guy TOO is avoided by females.
So what does the female want? The short answer would be non of the extremes. See what you said in your post. The guy loves the girl and protects the girl. Yes, is that in any way contradictory to what spunkberry said? In her entire post did she in any way devaluate a guy who was protective and loving? NO.
Neither did she approve of a guy that treats the girl like a slave and sells her off. Where are you coming up with these ridiculous notions? In all the posts here I have yet to see ANYONE say that. The only person who seems to think so would be you.
Okay, you want to know the middle ground as you call it? Think of your favorite childhood hero. Bruce Lee? Wong Fei Hong? Arnold ? Slyvester Stallone? James Bond?
Did they get the girls? Yes.
Were they confident? Yes
Did they beat assholes who hurt them or their loved ones up? Yes
Did they gamble, smoke, drink? Yes. That doesn't matter.
Were they badass? Yes
But did they treat their girls badly? No
Were they begging for girls to accept them? No
Did they beat girls up? No
Did they let girls push them around and despite that still treat em like a queen? No. They put them in place orderly or called them out on their childish behavior in a stern tone.
I can go on and on but yes, basicaly you have to find the middle ground. The romantic, understanding, empathetic, sensitive side of the "nice guy" while pertaining to the exciting, outgoing, protective, confident and secure side of the "bad boy" WHILE throwing away the weepy, pathetic, 24/7 pleasing even though the girl treats him like shit side of the nice guy and the "hurting people, bullying, demeaning" side of the bad boy.
That's it.
Nov 4 2010, 09:45 PM

Quote
0.0183sec
0.83
7 queries
GZIP Disabled