AMD® Socket AM2&AM3 Overclocking V24, Thuban or Bulldozer!? Its 6-Season
AMD® Socket AM2&AM3 Overclocking V24, Thuban or Bulldozer!? Its 6-Season
|
|
Jan 18 2011, 07:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
5.06GHz on 1.616v.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 25 2011, 01:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
|
|
|
Jan 30 2011, 03:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
yea, looking forward to amd bulldozer.
found another here: Bulldozer Shines in 3D Gaming and Rendering: AMD ![]() |
|
|
Feb 11 2011, 02:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(ah_khoo @ Feb 11 2011, 02:10 PM) how about this source? http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/sh...ll=1#post380767 it say cpu vdd voltage is the main thing to touch instead of cpu voltage? i also confused. QUOTE CPU-VDD and CPU-NB VDD are the VID voltages and all you really need to bother about. The 3rd and 4th options are offsets and not worth touching unless you want to go over 1.55V. Remember CPU Vid is higher than CPU-NB at default. Adding more CPU-NB voltage can add a lot of heat to the CPU...add voltage in tiny steps..not big jumps. ![]() |
|
|
Feb 11 2011, 02:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(ah_khoo @ Feb 11 2011, 02:18 PM) thanks for pointin out bro, it's been a while since i last use d board. come to think of it, one has d options to choose either to play w vid only or leave vid untouched & play w/ d offsets. ofcoz, playin w/ vid is more direct but if offsets can be smaller decimal, why not rite? hmm, because i m not clear how cpu vdd voltage and cpu voltage work.these 2 voltage also direct contribute to vcore? it is have to adjust either one? or need to adjust both? if these 2 voltage adjusted to different value, then it will take which one to be vcore? This post has been edited by saturn85: Feb 11 2011, 02:45 PM |
|
|
Feb 11 2011, 08:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(kuntawakaw @ Feb 11 2011, 08:02 PM) ok..lemme explain i see.using the term in the ss u posted. cpu-vdd is the base vcore that the processor control how much to take it. the real term for this (that amd uses) is cpu-vid as mention by ah khoo the real value is like 1.35v , 1.375v like that (depends on proc, BE can go 1.55v, non-BE is lower) for cpu-voltage, is mobo controlled. the real value is 0.025 , 0.05 (depends on mobo how fine the value) but for easy viewing, MSI make the value 1.36v ,1.37v. so the vcore we seeing is cpu-vdd + cpu- voltage. means the cpu vdd voltage on auto is the stock vcore of the cpu lo. and cpu voltage is the offset voltage that add to the cpu stock vcore. right? let say an amd cpu come with 1.35v stock vcore. if want to increase the vcore to 1.4v, have 2 options: 1) change cpu vdd voltage to 1.4v from auto, leave cpu voltage on auto (+0.00v). 2) leave cpu vdd voltage on auto (1.35v), change cpu voltage to +0.05v (equivalent to 1.4v on the msi board?) or even 3) change the cpu vdd voltage to 1.3v from auto, and change the cpu voltage to +0.1v (equivalent to 1.45v on the msi board?) is that like this? This post has been edited by saturn85: Feb 11 2011, 08:47 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 12 2011, 03:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(kuntawakaw @ Feb 11 2011, 10:34 PM) 1.yes i see. get the idea already. 2. yes 3. it should be 1.4v but msi not showing the cpu-voltage as offset. shown as real value. so will be user frenly, but it is. example: cpu-vdd = 1.35 and u add one notch of cpu voltage, it will starts with 1.36v (let say the increment is 0.001v im fogot the real value already) if cpu-vdd =1.50 u add one notch of cpu- voltage, it will starts with 1.51v |
|
|
Feb 12 2011, 06:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
|
|
|
Feb 14 2011, 01:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
i think the lack of L3 cache does have impact on it.
|
|
|
Feb 17 2011, 04:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
value ram pull down my HTT clock.
|
|
|
Feb 17 2011, 05:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(cloudwan @ Feb 17 2011, 04:55 PM) Why pulak bro? U can always use lower ram divider hmm, the value ram prevent me to go beyond 265MHz HTT.even with the lowest dram divider and loosen timing. but i didn't try increase dram voltage, don't have active cooling on it. |
|
|
Feb 17 2011, 09:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(kuntawakaw @ Feb 17 2011, 06:28 PM) may i know ur board bro..and ur ram.. hmm, i m using an older platform. i think higher is possible with ur setup.. assuming u using ddr3.. with 265htt, 1066 divider will get u 14XXmhz ram..i think many value ram can handle this.. so try with 1066 divider 1st and see... i encouterd soo many setups that dont like 800 ram divider.. so try with 1066..u might have higher chance.. btw, loosen timings..how loose? if like >CL 10, try make it max cl9 only.. i donno how true my guessings, but too loose wont help.. gambatte yo!! CPU: AMD Phenom FX-5000 Mainboard: DFI LANParty JR 790GX-M2RS (AM2+) RAM: Kingston 2x2GB DDR2 800 value ram QUOTE(keyo @ Feb 17 2011, 07:02 PM) is it ok im unlock my phenom 555 be and increase my cpu multipler to x19 . i not gain my cpu volt is it ok or will harm my stuff can someone help me tq yes, it is ok, as long as you clear about what you are doing. but without tweaking on vcore, doubt that it can hit the clock with cpu mutiplier of x19. |
|
|
Feb 18 2011, 12:08 AM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(mukufuchi @ Feb 17 2011, 10:52 PM) @saturn85 lowering the vcore can help in reduce temperature. bro...referring to my last post here: My Last Post u were suggesting me to lowering my vcore and higher my cpu nb clock...its done and hoping it will lowered the temp..i guess. But i cant make it to increase my core speed from 3.5ghz to 3.72ghz....BSOD soon after login the window...which part i miss? but increase cpu nb clock also need enough cpu nb voltage to do it. and now since you increase core clock to 3.72GHz, means you already increase the base clock. and that means you have to check every clock again, since those clock are link to the base clock with their respective multiplier. maybe cpu not enough voltage or dram clock not stable? post cpuz screen shoot if you manage to get it. QUOTE(kuntawakaw @ Feb 17 2011, 11:36 PM) ahh.. sorry. i dont have much exp on ddr2.. haha, last time the seller told me the culprit is value ram.and those i said might not valid (cuz last time, 400 divider is the most prefered divider to me because he face same case before. and after change to performance ram, the HTT clock can push higher. |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 18 2011, 12:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(kuntawakaw @ Feb 18 2011, 12:16 AM) might be and might not.. this is nice. but cuz i can say 26x is too low..i think most value ram can handle.. when we talk about >300htt then yes, perhaps we need high performance ram.. take a look.. a KVR can do just fine.. DDR2 667 5-5-5-15 ram at DDR2 800 4-4-4-10 speed. but how about the dram voltage for this? and what is the software that show all the dram timing there? |
|
|
Feb 18 2011, 12:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(kuntawakaw @ Feb 18 2011, 12:32 AM) 800 4-4-4 is not a wow i guess bro.. haha, but for me, it is. btw, it is CPU tweaker. u can use AOD also, i like AOD more cuz its richer (by few only dram voltage is per AOD.. mem vddq.. 2.75v (i believe i set 2.1v in bios.. not so sure, old SS ) but DDR2 value ram can stand 2.1v? and without active cooling on it. some overclocking guide state dram voltage is most sensitive voltage among them. improper use of it will result in burning dram chips. so i usually didn't touch dram voltage, and don't know how is the safe way to play with dram voltage. |
|
|
Feb 18 2011, 01:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(kuntawakaw @ Feb 18 2011, 01:00 AM) well.. depends on the ram chip itself.. i see.u touch it, if not hot, then ok..if hot..then not ok.. in my case, 2.1v is very2 ok,but max i will go for daily usage.. not like our risk taker.good tweaker sir antonio.. set his ddr3 to 2.4v iinm 1 ram that i know is hot is tracer.. with d9s inside.. but some models have rated voltage 2.1v..so still i think even its hot,it can stand the heat and the vdimm..huu if u afraid getting ur sticks killed, so better not.. make 2.0v max.. btw, ur KVR using what chip/ic? hmm, i didn't really pay attention to the chips. later when i clean up casing only see la. |
|
|
Feb 19 2011, 04:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(suhuann @ Feb 18 2011, 10:31 PM) Hello friends, sharing some results of my overclocking.. Not very impressive though, however I am very happy with it. nice overclock there. AMD Sempron 140@Unlocked | 3.6GHz | suhuann | MSI 785GTM-E45 : BIOS v8.6 | Crucial DDR2 | 1068MHz | 5-5-5-15 | Cocage MST-140 ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 03:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
220MHz x 10/3 = 733MHz
equivalent to DDR3 1466. |
|
|
Feb 25 2011, 09:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
Q2 is coming. AM3+..
![]() This post has been edited by saturn85: Feb 25 2011, 10:06 PM |
|
|
Mar 6 2011, 04:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
AM3+ socket originally have how many pin?
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0235sec
0.39
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 02:15 PM |