Zerg player will say Terran is sooo OP
Terran Player will say its the person donno how to use zerg well
Protoss player will say its not much OP

FruitSeller << GSL 1 Winner ( Zerg )

infestor is OP LOLOLOL... can i say that? btw , fruitseller is a good example to all whining zerg out there

Rofl! Never thought of this before!
Nobody will compare it like that. The game is not only consists of first tier unit. They are not the only unit you can build.

People keep complaining about Stalkers being more expensive than Marauders but couldn't beat Marauders 1v1. But there's no rule saying that you must use Stalker to fight Marauder. Besides, Stalkers can attack both air and ground, yet when people keep losing them to Marauders on ground, they complain.

When a Terran player mass Marauders and then lost to a Void Ray rush, they should complain too: "Why Marauders can't attack air? Wtf? Why Stalkers can attack air?".

Which is why, don't compare unit by unit. If you just look at the race balance this way you are going nowhere. Look at the overall gameplay. Might as well have just one race and not three races if all units have the same stat and building cost.

logically ultra can win thor 1 on 1 when there is no other units around...i've seen players ( pros dats being casted in HDstarcraft) tend to have thors vs ultras battle in choke point where oni 2 out of 8 ultras can atk at a time coz they're melee and thors' range atk jz happily blasting them from behind...dats the problem..

and i don think thor can win BC 1 on 1 though...unless its group mayb thors have the advantage...
IMO i don think ultras are OP, since their ram atk has been decreased after all...