Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Blizzard Bans Single Player Cheaters

views
     
dlct87
post Oct 12 2010, 06:01 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
474 posts

Joined: May 2007


so personal achievement/goal is ok, but when the game set the achievement/goal, then its suddenly "overrated, show off"?

and following the EULA is absurd, now i wonder whoever said this would consider following other rules(let say the law)is absurd?
Quazacolt
post Oct 12 2010, 06:07 PM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,365 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(neoengsheng @ Oct 12 2010, 05:56 PM)
So by your logic, unless I earned every bloody achievements available, highest possible equipment, highest PvP rating and maxed my gold, I am not qualified to complain?

I cleared the highest available content (4/4 ICC) before I quit because its so easy that its a joke, Blizzard was slow in releasing new content, I got bored and I choose to leave instead of keep paying monthly subscription. I do keep up with the update from time to time and found that there is nothing interesting anymore. In my opinion, I do win the game because I did take down the toughest possible boss before I leave, so I am satisfied with what I have achieved.
Remember as well that before Wotlk, there is no such thing as in game achievement and yet I enjoy the game even more.

So I decided to not buy Starcraft 2, if they continue this trend down to Diablo 3, I too will refuse to purchase Diablo 3.

In my opinion, Warhammer 40K is doing perfectly fine.
*
indirectly, yes. because blizzard intended ALL their content to be accessible by ANYONE. and what separates the casual than the hardcore/dedicated guilds/players are hard modes. there was no point creating content where only less than 5%-10% of the entire world's WoW population can access. (naxxramass pre TBC if you didn't realize)

and so you cleared 4/4 ICC, was it 4/4 LK hardmode? if no then i rest my case. if yes, then yes you are entitled to complain about how slow blizzard releases contents and/or how easy they were.

of course, you are entitled of your own opinions of what to buy and what to not buy. however you are aware on what forum you are in, and needless to say the majority (if not everyone) bought sc2, and trying to force your opinions/reasons on to the rest would be very unwise.

and yes, warhammer and warhammer 40k is doing pretty fine and dandy. though if you compared them against warcraft franchise and starcraft franchise, lets just say, not really. who knows what will happen if blizz did not create their own franchises and stuck with the warhammer ones. maybe it'll be greater, maybe it wont ever be good, not like we can all turn back time anyways. what we know now, warhammer/warhammer40k is pretty non-factor compared to the likes of what blizzard has.


Added on October 12, 2010, 6:09 pm
QUOTE(dlct87 @ Oct 12 2010, 06:01 PM)
so personal achievement/goal is ok, but when the game set the achievement/goal, then its suddenly "overrated, show off"?

and following the EULA is absurd, now i wonder whoever said this would consider following other rules(let say the law)is absurd?
*
yeah all of a sudden doing something in a game earning game (or achievement lol) points is bad. haha. sure as hell did not know that

ps: speeding laws in malaysia is absurd. LAWL

This post has been edited by Quazacolt: Oct 12 2010, 06:09 PM
evofantasy
post Oct 12 2010, 08:27 PM

Avadion of the Enders
*******
Senior Member
2,690 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Penang/ Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(neoengsheng @ Oct 12 2010, 05:56 PM)
So by your logic, unless I earned every bloody achievements available, highest possible equipment, highest PvP rating and maxed my gold, I am not qualified to complain?

I cleared the highest available content (4/4 ICC) before I quit because its so easy that its a joke, Blizzard was slow in releasing new content, I got bored and I choose to leave instead of keep paying monthly subscription. I do keep up with the update from time to time and found that there is nothing interesting anymore. In my opinion, I do win the game because I did take down the toughest possible boss before I leave, so I am satisfied with what I have achieved.
Remember as well that before Wotlk, there is no such thing as in game achievement and yet I enjoy the game even more.

So I decided to not buy Starcraft 2, if they continue this trend down to Diablo 3, I too will refuse to purchase Diablo 3.

In my opinion, Warhammer 40K is doing perfectly fine.
*
no offense but 4/4 back then was ez...
my guild cleared it on the first raid week...
the hard part comes for prof, sindra and LK...
heroic mode was a different story with a super steep learning for some bosses (saurfang, prof, lady, sindra and LK)...
even top guilds had problem killing LK lol...
wut blizz did was low end ez raids for casuals and heroic/ hardmode for the hardcores...
even as a hardcore back then (top mana unbuffed on server), i am fine wit such changes...
though i am nt bothered wit achievements LOL (though it gives free mount >.<)...

as for the warhammer series, i am a big fan...
i totally loved WAR though sadly it died due to the lack of content...
wutever warhammer MMO, i'll get it on release...
sure sc is inspired by war40k but nt everything is the same...
lots of fantasy games are inspired by lotr, does that make them bad?

^
wut a way to derail eh...


as for the banning of 3rd party, unless blizz allows addon 3rd party are a nono for SC2...
if u allow 3rd party, u allow openings for hacks during multiplayer...
even if u use it for SP only, how can blizz know?
if they went for more implicit method, ppl will say its nt respecting privacy...

5 Pages « < 3 4 5Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0171sec    0.72    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 12:00 AM