torres is injury prone..we r lucky not sign him this season..

actually hargreaves' injury problems were well documented even at bayern. why united were determined to snare him away from the bundesliga giants for such a high price is still a mystery if u ask me. i think some (if not most?) united fans know he's turning out be one really really bad signing  due to his fitness problems.

sorry to burst your bubble mate, but 25 million for torres is NEVER going to happen. it'll be 40 at the very least and mark my words, once barca or city get involved, it'll spiral into the region of 50 - 60 mil. roman isn't going to sanction that, not in our wildest dreams. apart from that, has torres even mentioned us?even once? the answer is no. that in itself will enable liverpool to play hardball, and drive the price up even further. as lovely as it would be for him to stride out in blue, i just don't see it materialising.

considering our most recent outlays of 17 - 18 million pounds for yuri and ramires, 25 for neymar sounds much,much more probable. and that is if the price stays that way.

the loss of yossi could persuade chelsea to do one of two things: get someone for cover in january, or accelerate the process of blooding josh/kakuta. both are good options.

definitely the right timing. boss should be fit for villa. would take some time to get up to speed though. not worried about his attacking instincts, just his defending that needs to be sharp against a rejuvenated villa team.

to be honest, im getting quite excited about neymar wanting to play for us and the deal would be done in 2011.

quite the confident lad. he is just going to dribble past the defenders he says.

For me at least let me visit SB first then..if you want  a new stadium..i support for the future...

i believe is interlink...develop new stadium needs money and i think the money shud spend on good players and build a super team..

Do u know that if chelsea move out of SB , they dont have the right to use the name chelsea anymore . The name stays at SB , forgot where i read it . Any one care to clarify/ investigate?

In purchasing the freehold and the naming rights, the intention was to ensure that Stamford Bridge could never again be sold to property developers and that the Chelsea FC name could not be traded on outside of the stadium. Should Chelsea decide to move to another stadium in the future, they will not be able to use the name Chelsea Football Club.

With terry n alex injured, chelsea may hav some defensive concern.

juventus wans...ivanovic....awww hope he stays....

i think he'll stay. chelsea is much better place for him rather than juventus...

Hi all chelsea fans, here a question

If it's just priority access to match tickets for every Chelsea game you want, this is the tier of membership for you. Members pay £5 less than non-members for match tickets so you only need to watch Chelsea five times and you'll recoup your membership fee!
But....How a non-member can buy a match ticket??