Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
English Clubs Chelsea FC - LYN True Blues 10/11, 12/12 Tottenham v Chelsea 23:55 CH817
|
madfag
|
Oct 7 2010, 04:04 PM
|
|
from our official website, actually our oldest on loan player is only 22 years old. i would like to see rajkovic come back to stamford bridge and play for us. also dont forget the likes of jack cork, nemanja matic and ryan bertrand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kerplunk
|
Oct 7 2010, 05:09 PM
|
Enthusiast
|
i think one of our members here mentioned about not understanding iva's sub for paulo during the arsenal game. i share the same sentiment. no offense to our much decorated portugese as its really just age catching up to him, but when he came on, arsenal threatened a lot more from his flank. i noticed iva failed to support the attack upfront, but he more than held his own against arsenal's speed demons. so the decision to take him off was baffling to say the least. iva to partner JT vs villa, and the boss to get one hell of a difficult comeback game! bruma vs heskey/agbonlahor is just too much of a risk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
aw13
|
Oct 7 2010, 05:24 PM
|
Forgive and Forget, Living in the Past is Time Consuming
|
Ferreira in for Iva could be CA trying to slow the pace down, as Iva more than often bombs forward than Ferreira. Also, Ferreira may be slow, but has bags of experience to maybe 'gauge' what Arsenal will be trying next (in form of attacking).
Also, Iva looks tired by the time he was subbed as well, prompting CA to put on 'fresher' legs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ichighost
|
Oct 7 2010, 09:14 PM
|
|
Bonus Question
1. Do we need a new higher capacity stadium..? Now? Future?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Belphegor
|
Oct 7 2010, 09:23 PM
|
|
Future. I still in love with SB and I think we still have places to expand our stadium.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ichighost
|
Oct 7 2010, 09:33 PM
|
|
For me at least let me visit SB first then..if you want a new stadium..i support for the future...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Belphegor
|
Oct 7 2010, 09:43 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Ichighost @ Oct 7 2010, 09:33 PM) For me at least let me visit SB first then..if you want a new stadium..i support for the future... Hahahah second that. +1
|
|
|
|
|
|
mybiebie
|
Oct 7 2010, 09:46 PM
|
|
win the champ league shud be priority...stadium later...
|
|
|
|
|
|
hidzwan
|
Oct 7 2010, 09:47 PM
|
|
QUOTE(mybiebie @ Oct 7 2010, 09:46 PM) win the champ league shud be priority...stadium later... that was totally two different thing my frens..
|
|
|
|
|
|
mybiebie
|
Oct 7 2010, 09:54 PM
|
|
i believe is interlink...develop new stadium needs money and i think the money shud spend on good players and build a super team..
|
|
|
|
|
|
sanfa
|
Oct 7 2010, 09:56 PM
|
|
but, don't forget that bigger stadium will generate more money.. 80K seats * 35 pounds per game.. its lot of money:)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Belphegor
|
Oct 7 2010, 09:56 PM
|
|
QUOTE(mybiebie @ Oct 7 2010, 09:54 PM) i believe is interlink...develop new stadium needs money and i think the money shud spend on good players and build a super team.. Our squad just won EPL last season and our players not good enough? Build a super team?
|
|
|
|
|
|
hidzwan
|
Oct 7 2010, 09:58 PM
|
|
i dun mind a small stadium as long it remain our fortress..
This post has been edited by hidzwan: Oct 7 2010, 10:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
mybiebie
|
Oct 7 2010, 10:02 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Belphegor @ Oct 7 2010, 09:56 PM) Our squad just won EPL last season and our players not good enough? Build a super team?  correct...they won the league..many times..but nt the champ league.
|
|
|
|
|
|
chitchat
|
Oct 7 2010, 10:33 PM
|
|
QUOTE(mybiebie @ Oct 7 2010, 09:54 PM) i believe is interlink...develop new stadium needs money and i think the money shud spend on good players and build a super team.. New stadium i dont think will be anytime soon. When RA come in he actually develop area around the stadium too, so expansion on STAMFORD BRIDGE is more likely. This also subject to whether SB still got space for further seat expansion. But with RA riches, if we need a new stadium, i think we would be able to build a new one without the need of taking loan from bank. I think to be self sustain club is also very important as according to forbes RA billion have depreciate too  2006 he is worth 18.2b QUOTE #50 Roman Abramovich Net Worth: $11.2 bil Fortune: Self Made Source: steel, investments Age: 43 Country Of Citizenship: Russia Residence: Moscow Education: NA Marital Status: Divorced, 6 children Fortune up on steel price recovery; stake in steel giant Evraz up nearly threefold. Also celebrating birth of son with girlfriend and art enthusiast Dasha Zhukova. Threw New Year's bash for his friends and partners on St. Barts, which cost a reported $5 million; Beyonce, Prince and Gwen Stefani performed. Orphaned as a child, Abramovich dropped out of college, then made fortune in a series of controversial oil export deals in early 1990s. Teamed up with Boris Berezovsky to take over oil giant Sibneft at a fraction of its market value. In 2003 to 2004, sold stake in Russian Aluminum to Oleg Deripaska. Sold 73% stake in Sibneft to gas titan Gazprom for $13 billion in 2005. Later bought stake in Evraz. Sold part of his stake in Highland Gold, a U.K. mining company with operations in Russia, to two of his business partners. Owns UK soccer team, Chelsea. source: http://www.forbes.com/lists/2010/10/billio...ovich_DG3G.html This post has been edited by chitchat: Oct 7 2010, 10:42 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Belphegor
|
Oct 7 2010, 10:47 PM
|
|
RA is one of the few billionaire who work their way up. Really admire these kind of people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
esca_flo
|
Oct 7 2010, 10:52 PM
|
|
Do u know that if chelsea move out of SB , they dont have the right to use the name chelsea anymore . The name stays at SB , forgot where i read it . Any one care to clarify/ investigate?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Belphegor
|
Oct 7 2010, 10:56 PM
|
|
QUOTE(esca_flo @ Oct 7 2010, 10:52 PM) Do u know that if chelsea move out of SB , they dont have the right to use the name chelsea anymore . The name stays at SB , forgot where i read it . Any one care to clarify/ investigate? Why not? Arsenal was moved from Highbury to Emirates stadium and they didn't change the name also.
|
|
|
|
|
|
esca_flo
|
Oct 7 2010, 11:11 PM
|
|
Search chelsea pitch owner in wikipedia and click on history , i lazy paste url link coz using phone to surf lowyat now. Huhu
|
|
|
|
|
|
Belphegor
|
Oct 7 2010, 11:27 PM
|
|
OMG yeah. QUOTE In purchasing the freehold and the naming rights, the intention was to ensure that Stamford Bridge could never again be sold to property developers and that the Chelsea FC name could not be traded on outside of the stadium. Should Chelsea decide to move to another stadium in the future, they will not be able to use the name Chelsea Football Club. sauce: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelsea_Pitch_OwnersOMG Don't move away from SB! Expand it instead. Apparently they own the naming rights. Maybe if we really move, we can buy out the rights of the name. This post has been edited by Belphegor: Oct 7 2010, 11:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|