No advisor here per se but a calculative bugger

. Hey, get ye hands off me money!

BTW, being er.. suckered by insurances with participating / whole life is one of my main reasons for learning PFP (Personal Financial Planning) and bouncing ideas/experiences in forums.
-------------
Just to share my experience with "whole life" vs term life, both 3Ds (death, disease, disability) from the same insurance company, Prudential. Please note - not against Prudential or any other insurance companies, they are there for a reason AND BUSINESS.
1. 1999 - bought a $150K coverage 3D "whole life" participating insurance from Prudential.
Monthly premium $300
2. 2001 - as my ex did not want to work anymore (ie. no salary/income), i had to cover more in case i kick the bucket ahead of time.
The extra to cover was $750K. I checked with my PRU agent my options and the most cost effective was term life, $310
3. Imagine if i did the "whole life" to cover $750K, what would my additional premium be monthly?
Simple calculation is $750K/$150K *$300 = approximately $1,500 extra per month
VS
$310 for term up to 55.
------------
Another experience - AIA. Bought when i was 19 going to 20 (1992)1. "Forced savings" - what to do, younger & stupider + sold by a relative.
2. Was given the hoo hah about 6%pa returns, critical year 10th or 11th year and i won't need to pay liao.
3. 12 years down the road, when i called AIA to inquire about "needing or not needing" to continue monthly payment, i was told i need to continue paying.
Ok... how long more? AIA said 5 years.
Ok... 5 years more then for sure i don't need to pay anymore right? The sum is big enough to generate $xxx based on y%pa to cover?
No - not for sure.
Hello...?! This was during a bull run in the 1990s (pre 1997/1998) for those who are too young to know. FD was hitting 12%pa!
and my "investment" didn't even hit 6%pa? Wonder fool - the fool being me. Forced savings / investing my arse
-------------
a. Thus, which would a logical human being choose to use for covering / transferring risk - term or whole life/participating?
Mind U, the main idea is risk management for me, NOT transferring $ / inheritance by-passing taxes and stuff like the super-rich.
b. When i reach retirement age, why the heck would i want life insurance as i DON'T have a working income?
My plan is to be self insured by then as generally, all the premiums paid if i continued on will be as good as self-insuring + insurance companies expenses & profits
c. SKY 1809, for a person stating that most of the posting shared here (mind U, it's our POVs and opinions, not 100% gospel truths) are "
Most likely it is to cover up their inadequate knowledge in this area", please share your calculations & reasoning lar.
+Stating items like "dunno when will die" and other stuff is not a good enough reason for me to pay 5X more for coverage than required. I'd rather take that $ and invest it myself.
+BTW, do U actually know how insurance works and that insurance companies are in it for a profit?
+Actuarial science and probabilities - at the end of the day, all the insurance premiums we pay are, at the end of the, nearly / actually self insuring AND the insurance companies' profits and operation costs.
+Are U the super rich portion of the rakyat that actually uses insurance as a savings and transfer of wealth vehicle?
+I think U are smarter than the average Joe since U seem to be active in the Stocks topic - have U actually sat down and calculated the costs of term insurance (say a block of years up to 55 or 60) VS cost of participating/whole life insurance? Take the cost difference and compound them at 6%pa only (bond funds - simple) and...?
+Given limited resources for average Joes like me (of course others may be playing at another level lar, like U), i need to allocate my resources AND be able to have enough coverage to transfer risks that i cannot absorb for now... UNTIL i build up my pile of assets. So, do U mean that term insurance is not good for that? Why? Coz it is "gone" and "wasted" unlike "cash balance" participating/whole life insurances?
+Do U know the ridiculous amount of % they give us for the first 5 years for our "investment"/"participating" portion of our premium?
Again, i've no bone to pick with U but the way U state things like "dunno how long will live / die" and thus "insure like heck"?
Using Steve Jobs as an example? U gotta kidding me dude - that fler can MORE THAN SELF INSURE.
Bottom line, in my opinion, experience and actual execution - term insurance, IN GENERAL, is the best bang for the buck to cover average Joes like me.
Share your real numbers and experience - pls dont use dunno when kaput and stuff. Those sounds like FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Denial) - where super sales people use to CONvince when logic can't prevail. Mind U - i'm not assuming you're an insurance agent yar.
I just want to know why / where U coming from, thus expand/learn from your experiences/views - not just the example U already gave 