QUOTE(Kurt Cobain @ Mar 8 2012, 02:05 PM)
Thank you Sir for your kind words and analysis
You are right. I only have these Fixed Income only with no property investment/stock/equity (which led me to post here as rather concern on my status). I exclude bonus because I consider it as can be used for those one time buys like watches/travels etc.
By asset allocation, it means I should try looking outside FD right? I have been considering alot about buying a property for investment/renting purposes. Will need to read up more on this topic.
Can you please elaborate briefly the term 'financial freedom'? Does it mean no debts/loan?
I am looking at the numbers at the excel screenshot and will ask again when I am in doubt.
Again, thank you so much for your time

Wei..no "Sir" "Sir" pls. The Queen of England hasn't Knighted me... yet

Heheh, if i dont include bonus as my net income savings, i'd be only doing 30%+/- (including bonus 46%+/-, NOT even near yours). Yours is great at 56%+ and excluding bonus!
-------
Spot on - Asset Allocation, as in look into moving some resources (from Fixed Incomes like FD and savings) into Biz Equities (stocks, equity funds, businesses) and Real Estate Equities (Properties and REITs). Gold, commodities, and other "alternatives" should be secondary only, IMHO.
The main reason for Asset Allocation is to have assets in 3 distinct types of classes, which does NOT react the same to economic news/cycles.
Note though, some times different asset classes look like reacting the same way to a major problem (eg 2008 Nov to 2009 Mar) - both Biz & Real Estate equities plunged. However, bonds went up and thus, even though 2 of the 3 asset classes held fell, if one just held a simple 1/3 of each, one can use the 1/3 in Fixed Income to buy cheap equities and make a killing in end 2010 and 2011

A simpler way of thinking about the concept of Asset Allocation is:
Assigning players of a football game.
Players = your $/resources.
Football game = Goal to achieve Financial freedom
+IF U assign all 11 players as defense & goalie, U think can win/score? NEAR invincible defense (can still lose) but cannot score at all to win
+IF U assign all to mid-field, maybe can score a bit, may be can defend a bit
+IF U assign 3 attackers + 4 midfielders + 3 defense (+1 goalie), U have a good chance of scoring + covering defense / supplying opportunities to score + good chance of defending
Thus, attackers = Biz Equities
midfielders = Real Estate Equities
defense = Bonds & FD, with final defense/goalie = Cash
-------
Financial Freedom means different things to different folks (eg. free time, choice, etc.)
I took the most literal meaning - having assets that can generate $ >= expenses, without working 8hrs a day
eg. Working an average of 1hr to 2hrs a day to maintain/manage these assets, is to me, acceptable though may not be acceptable to some.
simple eg.
Having $1.6M in FD which gives 3%pa = $48K interest pa.
while annual expenses = $35K
OR better eg.
Having
$533,333 in FD & Bonds averaging 4%pa: $21,333pa
$533,333 in Properties & REITs averaging rental/dividend yield 6%pa: $31,999.98pa
$533,333 in stocks & equity funds averaging capital gains/dividend returns of 8%pa: $42,666.64pa
= $94K+pa on average VS annual expenses of $35K
Note:
Stocks' & equity funds' returns can swing wildly, from experience +70% to -50% in a year (excluding the crazy 1997-1998 -80%), though long term 10yrs average is approximately 8%pa compounded. Thus, if one is thinking of "Why not plonk everything into Biz Equities?", one may not last long enough to see the 8%pa returns (ie. starved to death already).
--------
No probs - glad to be of help rather than causing more
This post has been edited by wongmunkeong: Mar 8 2012, 03:32 PM