Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Android 3.0 release soon...why so fast?

views
     
TScheehing
post Aug 11 2010, 08:42 AM, updated 16y ago

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
891 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
Android 3.0 Gingerbread details: 1280760 resolution, 1Ghz minimum specs, mid-Oct. release

Android 3.0 !!!

Just want to ask why Android keep release newer version ?
v2.2 just release but v3 ard known will get it end of this year...
this cause the user outdated fast...
KTCY
post Aug 11 2010, 08:49 AM

BumbleBeeā„¢
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(cheehing @ Aug 11 2010, 08:42 AM)
Android 3.0 Gingerbread details: 1280760 resolution, 1Ghz minimum specs, mid-Oct. release

Android 3.0 !!!

Just want to ask why Android keep release newer version ?
v2.2 just release but v3 ard known will get it end of this year...
this cause the user outdated fast...
*
It's just rumors. My guess will be even if there is 3.0 but announcement this year. Release ? Next year.
mmmaak
post Aug 11 2010, 08:52 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
67 posts

Joined: Feb 2008


QUOTE(KTCY @ Aug 11 2010, 08:49 AM)
It's just rumors. My guess will be even if there is 3.0 but announcement this year. Release ? Next year.
*
Old (and possibly inaccurate) rumours.

Dan Morrill on Gingerbread

This post has been edited by mmmaak: Aug 11 2010, 08:53 AM
akachester
post Aug 11 2010, 08:57 AM

Its Life. Live with it!
*******
Senior Member
7,689 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: The Land of No Return


Well, the rumours had been circulating out there for quite some time now in regards to Gingerbread but there are no solid announcement so far. It was last said to be release by end of this year but expect it to release next year unless its a "google phone". FroYo was announced to be released in June and its now August and not all of the phones have them yet smile.gif
Pennywise
post Aug 11 2010, 09:11 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Smartphone has become like personal computers. OS keeps on coming out and then we need to keep on upgrading if we were to chase after it. Else, live with 2.2, it can already do a lot.
akachester
post Aug 11 2010, 09:17 AM

Its Life. Live with it!
*******
Senior Member
7,689 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: The Land of No Return


But 3.0 doesn't have the hype as much as the FroYo. What that is said so far was only a completely revamped UI for the Android which is said to be going to be better than the Sense. Other than that, nothing much since.
kevin613
post Aug 11 2010, 09:27 AM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,236 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: BB Bangi


why are you afraid of rapid development? kiasu ar?
TScheehing
post Aug 11 2010, 09:57 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
891 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
i just wonder why android keep on release newer version in short period...
this will make the android phone no more value in market...
benny888
post Aug 11 2010, 10:00 AM

Gadget Freak
Group Icon
Elite
27,801 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Johor


The faster the better ; the more varieties the better. One can never have enough of this especially if the current crop of Nexus, Desires, Galaxy S can use it


Added on August 11, 2010, 10:01 am
QUOTE(cheehing @ Aug 11 2010, 09:57 AM)
i just wonder why android keep on release newer version in short period...
this will make the android phone no more value in market...
*
Not necessary if the phones can be upgraded - eg Nexus, Desire and Galaxy S, Droid X ( with rooting )

This post has been edited by benny888: Aug 11 2010, 10:02 AM
treyston
post Aug 11 2010, 10:09 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
54 posts

Joined: May 2005


becoz of Windows Phone 7? have to come out a better OS to fight it back =)
sugebleach
post Aug 11 2010, 10:15 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
501 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
Android 3.0 is more focus on tablet. You no need to have so much worries.
I always feel better whenever there is new version available smile.gif
TScheehing
post Aug 11 2010, 10:17 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
891 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
QUOTE(benny888 @ Aug 11 2010, 10:00 AM)
The faster the better ; the more varieties the better. One can never have enough of this especially if the current crop of Nexus, Desires, Galaxy S can use it


Added on August 11, 2010, 10:01 am
Not necessary if the phones can be upgraded - eg Nexus, Desire and Galaxy S, Droid X ( with rooting )
*
yes but v3.0 requirement is quite high....
KTCY
post Aug 11 2010, 10:25 AM

BumbleBeeā„¢
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(cheehing @ Aug 11 2010, 09:57 AM)
i just wonder why android keep on release newer version in short period...
this will make the android phone no more value in market...
*
I doubt so. But after all it's a liabilities. You're expecting your phone to stay that value or increase over time ? Don't be silly smile.gif

QUOTE(cheehing @ Aug 11 2010, 10:17 AM)
yes but v3.0 requirement is quite high....
*
So ? I guess those with 1Ghz proc can catch up with that.
exentric_nova
post Aug 11 2010, 10:27 AM

I Am Serious
******
Senior Member
1,702 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Semenyih


One tidbits on Gingerbread. Unlike the 'news' that comes with Don, this one have a different source.
QUOTE
Turning our attention to tablets, Samsung is said to be prepping a 7-inch device with a front-facing camera (something we're expecting to see on pretty much all high-end smartphones and tablets going forward). Motorola, meanwhile, is apparently working on a 10-inch model -- something we've heard before -- that will feature a processor of 1GHz or better paired with Android 3.0 Gingerbread. What's notable here is that BGR's  source is saying that the inclusion of Android 3.0 could push the Moto launch out to February 2011, but inside sources of our own are reporting that tablet devices running Gingerbread are still figuring into Verizon's Q4 2010 plans, so we'll have to wait and see how that shakes out.

Engadget


Here's one more interesting point for future versions of Android by Dan Morrill.
QUOTE
    Talking about Android 3, I have one more remark. There will be cheap Android phones, there will be a lot of them, phones that will cost $200, EUR200

    Q. With Gingerbread?
    No.  Not Gingerbread, not 3. But 2.1/2.2. For all practical purposes we will get the split – light/old hardware, cheap phones – but old Android. Want to get maximum multimedia experience:  Divx playback out of the box, support for heavy formats, lossless mp3 codecs – you have to buy powerful hardware.

    Q. And the upgrades – will they be free, or paid?
    Upgrades will be free. The thing is, that not everyone will be upgraded. Droid X could be upgraded, Samsung Galaxy S… But not everyone

The time has come where older devices will be left in the dust.
Cynox
post Aug 11 2010, 10:51 AM

Back to AMD camp!!!
*******
Senior Member
5,362 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Johor Bahru


QUOTE(cheehing @ Aug 11 2010, 09:57 AM)
i just wonder why android keep on release newer version in short period...
this will make the android phone no more value in market...
*
why is it concern you as a user? Unless you are an android programmer. And if the update rolling out slower, it does not make the phone value depreciate slower. doh.gif

For me, the real value of the phone is its build quality and usability. Build quality can determine how long you will be using it, the better the build quality, the longer you can use it, and more value it will bring to you. The usability of course is the usefulness and function of the phone that can help/entertain you in your daily life.

My previous Treo 680 has been serving me for 3 years plus and i must say it is an excellent phone, but due to normal wear and tear, the phone function has some problem recently. So I upgraded to Desire. In the aspect of usability, the only "upgrade" for me is the Wi-Fi connectivity on Desire coz the Treo 680 does not have it to check my office email. All the other features of Desire - AMOLED screen, fast hardware, lots of softwares to choose from, etc are just the icing on the cake.

That's why I choose my next phone carefully, after research high and low and finally settle on HTC Desire. I believe it will serve me for quite some time. If there is free update in the OS - Froyo/Gingerbread/whatever, I will appreciate it but if not, I just utilise whatever I have.
akachester
post Aug 11 2010, 11:14 AM

Its Life. Live with it!
*******
Senior Member
7,689 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: The Land of No Return


QUOTE(exentric_nova @ Aug 11 2010, 10:27 AM)
One tidbits on Gingerbread. Unlike the 'news' that comes with Don, this one have a different source.

Engadget
Here's one more interesting point for future versions of Android by Dan Morrill.

The time has come where older devices will be left in the dust.
*
Previous statements from Google did say that 3.0 (Gingerbread) will be targetted at High End Phones while the Low End ones will stick to 2.1/2.2. And minimum requirements for the Gingerbread is 1Ghz processor. Currently, there is no guarantee on which current phone will get Gingerbread (Heck, some even waited like infinitely for FroYo) but those with lower than 1Ghz processor could pretty much forget about it for now.
samurai1337
post Aug 11 2010, 11:21 AM

@_@
Group Icon
VIP
11,594 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Area 51

QUOTE(akachester @ Aug 11 2010, 11:14 AM)
Previous statements from Google did say that 3.0 (Gingerbread) will be targetted at High End Phones while the Low End ones will stick to 2.1/2.2. And minimum requirements for the Gingerbread is 1Ghz processor. Currently, there is no guarantee on which current phone will get Gingerbread (Heck, some even waited like infinitely for FroYo) but those with lower than 1Ghz processor could pretty much forget about it for now.
*
SE X10 is still waiting for Eclair doh.gif
ABeatC
post Aug 11 2010, 12:38 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
180 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
Legend waiting for Froyo sad.gif
akachester
post Aug 11 2010, 12:41 PM

Its Life. Live with it!
*******
Senior Member
7,689 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: The Land of No Return


QUOTE(samurai1337 @ Aug 11 2010, 11:21 AM)
SE X10 is still waiting for Eclair  doh.gif
*
And they quoted : "Something SMARTER is coming" tongue.gif
areankim
post Aug 11 2010, 12:44 PM

"Live Life Cool"
*******
Senior Member
3,705 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Planet Earth



i want android tablet!!!! say no to IPAD!
Andrew Lim
post Aug 11 2010, 01:06 PM

Just keep on keeping on
*******
Senior Member
2,844 posts

Joined: Nov 2007


I can't believe a few people are actually complaining about Google continuing to improve Android at a fast pace. I'd rather they do that since it shows they're still committed to the project.
andrekua
post Aug 11 2010, 01:08 PM

NO!!! IT'S HIM!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,887 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(cheehing @ Aug 11 2010, 10:17 AM)
yes but v3.0 requirement is quite high....
*
Where got high la...
Whether they want to support or not nia. Luckily Android is open source and they can mod and install, just like what they did with Hero.
There aint gonna be 3d homescreen or what. While Flash is supported, Google actually prefer HTML5. HTML5 does not consume at much resources as Flash.
CGLegacy
post Aug 11 2010, 01:18 PM

Buka Sos
*******
Senior Member
2,109 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: ~Ipoh Mali, Ipoh, Ipoh Mali~



QUOTE(benny888 @ Aug 11 2010, 10:00 AM)
The faster the better ; the more varieties the better. One can never have enough of this especially if the current crop of Nexus, Desires, Galaxy S can use it


Added on August 11, 2010, 10:01 am
Not necessary if the phones can be upgraded - eg Nexus, Desire and Galaxy S, Droid X ( with rooting )
*
true enough... if u already have the devices... why bother... just uprade it... (if u can upgradelah).... more security... more themes... more of more.... tongue.gif


Added on August 11, 2010, 1:20 pm
QUOTE(Andrew Lim @ Aug 11 2010, 01:06 PM)
I can't believe a few people are actually complaining about Google continuing to improve Android at a fast pace. I'd rather they do that since it shows they're still committed to the project.
*
Open Source will live on... live on strong as long as God wills it... rclxms.gif thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by CGLegacy: Aug 11 2010, 01:20 PM
bonanno
post Aug 11 2010, 09:21 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
466 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(cheehing @ Aug 11 2010, 08:42 AM)
Android 3.0 Gingerbread details: 1280760 resolution, 1Ghz minimum specs, mid-Oct. release

Android 3.0 !!!

Just want to ask why Android keep release newer version ?
v2.2 just release but v3 ard known will get it end of this year...
this cause the user outdated fast...
*
That's Google my friend... smile.gif

the100308
post Aug 11 2010, 10:58 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,849 posts

Joined: Sep 2007


Google like to release thing fast... for example google chrome...
MYstombox
post Aug 11 2010, 11:04 PM

Wired!
*******
Senior Member
2,240 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: Johor


New OS is released fast so manufacturers can pick it up and toy with it and develop hardware that revolves around this OS.

If you look at other OS development, once an OS stuck, the hardware doesn't really improve much already. Or the hardware improves to the point the OS limits the possibilities the hardware can provide to the user.
the100308
post Aug 11 2010, 11:25 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,849 posts

Joined: Sep 2007


QUOTE(MYstombox @ Aug 11 2010, 11:04 PM)
New OS is released fast so manufacturers can pick it up and toy with it and develop hardware that revolves around this OS.

If you look at other OS development, once an OS stuck, the hardware doesn't really improve much already. Or the hardware improves to the point the OS limits the possibilities the hardware can provide to the user.
*
Agree, I would prefer the way of google, sorry for all developers tho... But once I get used to google update pace.. Others software or hardwares seem to have a slow pace... dam
feiraron
post Aug 11 2010, 11:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
236 posts

Joined: Nov 2009


the only reason i could think off why anyone wouldnt want a fast upgrade to the platform is...
phone manufacturers are not updating their phones fast enough to follow google's pace...
end users stand to benefit from an OS update no matter what (unless you are stuck with an old hardware) but that doesnt make your phone outdated, jeez its not like 2.1 eclair is unusable or old fashioned anytime soon, an upgrade should be seen as a bonus, your phone works and can be use for what it is intended for with the old platform anyway

but i think this sentiment happens because of the now really not needed and unnecessary manufacturer skin on top of android..
HTC Sense, Motoblur etc etc is totally not needed...
why do manufacturer even waste their time to ensure their skin working "seamlessly" with a new OS update before giving their users the update??
upwards of 2.2 and above.. the stock android can do everything that the skin ever does.. its totally unnecessary and I think only Motorola realizes this and are giving their users faster update with motoblur being thrown to the background as just an app..
MYstombox
post Aug 11 2010, 11:42 PM

Wired!
*******
Senior Member
2,240 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: Johor


QUOTE(the100308 @ Aug 11 2010, 11:25 PM)
Agree, I would prefer the way of google, sorry for all developers tho... But once I get used to google update pace.. Others software or hardwares seem to have a slow pace... dam
*
Developers need not worry so much, because the system is quite similar, they only need to modify the code a bit.
Besides, this makes it better for developers IMO, it gives them more flexibility in their product offering; hardware, and more customer base; apps.

One of the best example is the HD2, brilliant hardware, but the OS is kinda out of date for it, and doesn't offer the user the full potential of the hardware.

This post has been edited by MYstombox: Aug 11 2010, 11:43 PM
keyibukeyi
post Aug 11 2010, 11:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
150 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
From: Klang, Selangor D.E Status: Work Everyday
problem with out date user?
bonanno
post Aug 11 2010, 11:49 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
466 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(feiraron @ Aug 11 2010, 11:36 PM)
the only reason i could think off why anyone wouldnt want a fast upgrade to the platform is...
phone manufacturers are not updating their phones fast enough to follow google's pace...
end users stand to benefit from an OS update no matter what (unless you are stuck with an old hardware) but that doesnt make your phone outdated, jeez its not like 2.1 eclair is unusable or old fashioned anytime soon, an upgrade should be seen as a bonus, your phone works and can be use for what it is intended for with the old platform anyway

but i think this sentiment happens because of the now really not needed and unnecessary manufacturer skin on top of android..
HTC Sense, Motoblur etc etc is totally not needed...
why do manufacturer even waste their time to ensure their skin working "seamlessly" with a new OS update before giving their users the update??
upwards of 2.2 and above.. the stock android can do everything that the skin ever does.. its totally unnecessary and I think only Motorola realizes this and are giving their users faster update with motoblur being thrown to the background as just an app..
*
there's no different "inside" if they dont have their own UI ...only hardware spec & designed...

the100308
post Aug 11 2010, 11:54 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,849 posts

Joined: Sep 2007


QUOTE(MYstombox @ Aug 11 2010, 11:42 PM)
Developers need not worry so much, because the system is quite similar, they only need to modify the code a bit.
Besides, this makes it better for developers IMO, it gives them more flexibility in their product offering; hardware, and more customer base; apps.

One of the best example is the HD2, brilliant hardware, but the OS is kinda out of date for it, and doesn't offer the user the full potential of the hardware.
*
You never know, for once in a while, "rewrite from the core" will be done

This post has been edited by the100308: Aug 11 2010, 11:54 PM
azizul1975
post Aug 12 2010, 06:08 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,081 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


For me, Google updating OS fast does not make phone obsolete quickly, bcoz the phone hardware will still be usable for the new OS...

So TS, no need to worry....
akachester
post Aug 12 2010, 09:13 AM

Its Life. Live with it!
*******
Senior Member
7,689 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: The Land of No Return


QUOTE(azizul1975 @ Aug 12 2010, 06:08 AM)
For me, Google updating OS fast does not make phone obsolete quickly, bcoz the phone hardware will still be usable for the new OS...

So TS, no need to worry....
*
It depends. Not all phone can make the jump in OS. And in the case of the Gingerbread, Google makes it clear that it is only going to appear on High End Phones, while lower end ones are gonna have to stick with Eclair / FroYo. Thus, i believe not many "current" phone will get the jump over to Gingerbread when it arrives.
the100308
post Aug 12 2010, 09:21 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,849 posts

Joined: Sep 2007


QUOTE(akachester @ Aug 12 2010, 09:13 AM)
It depends. Not all phone can make the jump in OS. And in the case of the Gingerbread, Google makes it clear that it is only going to appear on High End Phones, while lower end ones are gonna have to stick with Eclair / FroYo. Thus, i believe not many "current" phone will get the jump over to Gingerbread when it arrives.
*
It's not ONLY, it's RECOMMENDED......

This post has been edited by the100308: Aug 12 2010, 09:22 AM
feiraron
post Aug 12 2010, 02:58 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
236 posts

Joined: Nov 2009


QUOTE(bonanno @ Aug 11 2010, 11:49 PM)
there's no different "inside" if they dont have their own UI ...only hardware spec & designed...
*
and your point?... i know there is no different android inside, im just pointing out the reason for the delays of users getting new firmware update is because the phone manufacturers wants to make it work with their own UI first before releasing it to their users, and it is totally not needed as the stock android is already good enough..
ineser
post Aug 12 2010, 08:25 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,068 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
From: Kuching, Sarawak
Finally there are some "strict" requirements...
Hopefully there wont be any problem like cant install this app or cant run that...
bonanno
post Aug 12 2010, 10:47 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
466 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(feiraron @ Aug 12 2010, 02:58 PM)
and your point?... i know there is no different android inside, im just pointing out the reason for the delays of users getting new firmware update is because the phone manufacturers wants to make it work with their own UI first before releasing it to their users, and it is totally not needed as the stock android is already good enough..
*
haaa...then how manufacture attract people to buy their phone..? coz the different only outlook & spec...

Many ppl dont knw shit about android, they just love the UI display...

so choose your next device wisely ..

for me, if Google continue with Nexus Two..its definitely my next phone..why ..because i know i will be 1st to get the latest firmware update.. dont you see nexus one was the 1st running on Froyo.?

Look at SE, x10 still with 1.6, HTC hero just got their official 2.1 Eclair update not long ago..
I think Motorola did very good in firmware update for their compare to other manufacture

Users has wide choice now, if the manufacture still keep their old style strategy..sure they will left behind...


Added on August 12, 2010, 11:01 pmAfter Gingerbread, wondering whats the next code name

1.5 - Cupcake
1.6 - Donut
2.1 - Eclair
2.2 - Froyo
3.0 - Gingerbread

next - Honeybun ?

rolleyes.gif rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by bonanno: Aug 12 2010, 11:01 PM
xngjn
post Aug 12 2010, 11:19 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,239 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
"Minimum hardware requirements for Android 3.0 devices are: 1GHZ CPU, 512MB or RAM, displays from 3.5ā€ and higher"??

then HTC Wildfire cant use it. sad.gif
bonanno
post Aug 12 2010, 11:29 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
466 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(xngjn @ Aug 12 2010, 11:19 PM)
"Minimum hardware requirements for Android 3.0 devices are: 1GHZ CPU, 512MB or RAM, displays from 3.5ā€ and higher"??

then HTC Wildfire cant use it. sad.gif
*
you were right.. sorry mate...my hero cant use also..

last year..my new bought HTC HERO still consider "high end" phone..but today.. cry.gif cry.gif cry.gif

that why im wait for 1.3-1.5 ghz phone ..hopefully end of this year..
plateau
post Aug 12 2010, 11:41 PM

Don't Touch My Starsā„¢
*****
Senior Member
984 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


QUOTE(xngjn @ Aug 12 2010, 11:19 PM)
"Minimum hardware requirements for Android 3.0 devices are: 1GHZ CPU, 512MB or RAM, displays from 3.5ā€ and higher"??

then HTC Wildfire cant use it. sad.gif
*
Just to clarify things up. It's not minimum but it's "recommended" hardware specs thumbup.gif
xngjn
post Aug 13 2010, 12:16 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,239 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
•Android’s split into 2 branches becomes official. 3.0 for top of the line/high end devices. Cheap, low-end mass market handsets will keep Android 2.1/2.2

then hope all software and games support both version. dont just support 3.0 version only

This post has been edited by xngjn: Aug 13 2010, 12:20 AM
x132755
post Aug 13 2010, 03:51 PM

How To Own A Property Without Spending Your Money? Got 1 Way....
********
All Stars
13,313 posts

Joined: Jan 2008


QUOTE(cheehing @ Aug 11 2010, 08:42 AM)
Android 3.0 Gingerbread details: 1280760 resolution, 1Ghz minimum specs, mid-Oct. release

Android 3.0 !!!

Just want to ask why Android keep release newer version ?
v2.2 just release but v3 ard known will get it end of this year...
this cause the user outdated fast...
*
great news thumbup.gif
fast fast coming...exciting the market rclxm9.gif
vckc4ever
post Aug 18 2010, 08:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(cheehing @ Aug 11 2010, 08:42 AM)
Android 3.0 Gingerbread details: 1280760 resolution, 1Ghz minimum specs, mid-Oct. release

Android 3.0 !!!

Just want to ask why Android keep release newer version ?
v2.2 just release but v3 ard known will get it end of this year...
this cause the user outdated fast...
*
wow..so soon ? i tot tat is for end year or early next year...for 3.0


then what will happen to those tablets using 1.5 ?? Geee...it will become dinosaur era...hehehe... lots of chinese brand tablets will be affected. Including Archos Home Tablet 7 inch n 5 inch.

Cheers !
Vince
faridaizuddin
post Aug 18 2010, 11:56 PM

Androidian
******
Senior Member
1,017 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
From: Terengganu


QUOTE
After Gingerbread, wondering whats the next code name

1.5 - Cupcake
1.6 - Donut
2.1 - Eclair
2.2 - Froyo
3.0 - Gingerbread

next - Honeybun ?

Ā 


1.5 - Cupcake
1.6 - Donut
2.0 - (exact name please??)
2.1 - Eclair
2.2 - Froyo
2.3 - ?
2.4 - ?
2.5 - ?
2.6 - ?
2.7 - ?
2.8 - ?
2.9 - ?
3.0 - Gingerbread

Why there are only small number of OS version for each 1.x and 2.x? Why not continue with 2.3 until 2.9 first?
Or maybe it shows huge performance increasing from each batch?? hmm.gif hmm.gif
Who knows? Only Google's insider know.. hmm.gif hmm.gif

This post has been edited by faridaizuddin: Aug 19 2010, 07:22 AM
vckc4ever
post Aug 19 2010, 11:46 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(faridaizuddin @ Aug 18 2010, 11:56 PM)
1.5 - Cupcake
1.6 - Donut
2.0 - (exact name please??)
2.1 - Eclair
2.2 - Froyo
2.3 - ?
2.4 - ?
2.5 - ?
2.6 - ?
2.7 - ?
2.8 - ?
2.9 - ?
3.0 - Gingerbread

Why there are only small number of OS version for each 1.x and 2.x? Why not continue with 2.3 until 2.9 first?
Or maybe it shows huge performance increasing from each batch??  hmm.gif  hmm.gif
Who knows? Only Google's insider know..  hmm.gif  hmm.gif
*
HAHAHA..good one.

Maybe these names are in the making... :

2.3 - Aiyoh
2.4 - Haiseh
2.5 - Choco
2.6 - Fruitcake
2.7 - Wahlau
2.8 - Chialat
2.9 - goggle ?

guppy
post Aug 19 2010, 11:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
206 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(vckc4ever @ Aug 19 2010, 11:46 AM)
HAHAHA..good one.

Maybe these names are in the making... :

2.3 - Aiyoh
2.4 - Haiseh
2.5 - Choco
2.6 - Fruitcake
2.7 - Wahlau
2.8 - Chialat
2.9 - goggle ?
*
The releases are named alphabetically.
1.5 - Cupcake
1.6 - Donut
2.1 - Eclair
2.2 - Froyo
3.0 - Gingerbread
hihihehe
post Aug 19 2010, 08:37 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
13,791 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: stress & confuse world



QUOTE(faridaizuddin @ Aug 19 2010, 01:56 AM)
1.5 - Cupcake
1.6 - Donut
2.0 - (exact name please??)
2.1 - Eclair
2.2 - Froyo
2.3 - ?
2.4 - ?
2.5 - ?
2.6 - ?
2.7 - ?
2.8 - ?
2.9 - ?
3.0 - Gingerbread

Why there are only small number of OS version for each 1.x and 2.x? Why not continue with 2.3 until 2.9 first?
Or maybe it shows huge performance increasing from each batch??  hmm.gif  hmm.gif
Who knows? Only Google's insider know..  hmm.gif  hmm.gif
*
that is because 3.0 is a huge jump so they make it 3.0 instead of 2.2(but still they haven't confirmed whether they put it as version 3 right?)

btw,before Gingerbread release,here comes the next codename..
Honeycomb

http://www.intomobile.com/2010/08/19/googl...a-small-update/


vckc4ever
post Aug 20 2010, 04:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(guppy @ Aug 19 2010, 11:50 AM)
The releases are named alphabetically.
1.5 - Cupcake
1.6 - Donut
2.1 - Eclair
2.2 - Froyo
3.0 - Gingerbread
*
Ah..just realised it..

All food based and in alpha order ..make me hungry liau..

Tks bro.
blur_goofy
post Sep 7 2010, 08:29 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
354 posts

Joined: Sep 2006


nope.
dun think google is updating android 'too fast'

by the time google announce 3.0 gingerbread officially at the end of the year (rumored) it will take at least a few months to get it ready to release, another few more mnths by manufacturer (htc,samsung etc) to update. should be the right timing..

im guessing gingerbread will be ready by mid next year? hmm.gif

This post has been edited by blur_goofy: Sep 7 2010, 08:30 AM
RieZky
post Sep 7 2010, 08:35 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
219 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: AlorStar


rumors...rumors..
puteh
post Sep 7 2010, 01:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
200 posts

Joined: May 2009
From: Somewhere in SummerTime !
QUOTE(kevin613 @ Aug 11 2010, 09:27 AM)
why are you afraid of rapid development? kiasu ar?
*
The ultimate iphone4 killer is android......to infinity n beyond rclxms.gif
zharyn
post Sep 7 2010, 11:32 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
53 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Kluang



QUOTE(vckc4ever @ Aug 20 2010, 04:53 PM)
Ah..just realised it..

All food based and in alpha order ..make me hungry liau..

Tks bro.
*
yup...it based on the dessert name...but i'm really drolling for frozen yogurt - froyo right now
faridaizuddin
post Sep 8 2010, 03:14 PM

Androidian
******
Senior Member
1,017 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
From: Terengganu


QUOTE(zharyn @ Sep 7 2010, 11:32 PM)
yup...it based on the dessert name...but i'm really drolling for frozen yogurt - froyo right now
*
Phone model please?? hmm.gif
zharyn
post Sep 8 2010, 03:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
53 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Kluang



QUOTE(faridaizuddin @ Sep 8 2010, 03:14 PM)
Phone model please?? hmm.gif
*
my dear sgs
biggrin.gif
faridaizuddin
post Sep 9 2010, 10:05 AM

Androidian
******
Senior Member
1,017 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
From: Terengganu


QUOTE(zharyn @ Sep 8 2010, 03:43 PM)
my dear sgs
biggrin.gif
*
If i'm not mistaken.. samsung already released update for 2.2 for SGS right?
Correct me if i'm wrong..
hazremi
post Sep 9 2010, 10:12 AM

1million people saved this avatar bcoz she's too cute!
*******
Senior Member
5,676 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL



any specific model phone for 3.0?i'm waiting for that one to switch to android!
faridaizuddin
post Sep 9 2010, 10:26 AM

Androidian
******
Senior Member
1,017 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
From: Terengganu


QUOTE(hazremi @ Sep 9 2010, 10:12 AM)
any specific model phone for 3.0?i'm waiting for that one to switch to android!
*
As what I heard from a lot of sources, Android 3.0 will only applicable to any Android tablet after this while Gingerbread or 2.3 is their upcoming OS update for smartphone after Froyo completely unleashed.. nod.gif
zharyn
post Sep 9 2010, 03:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
53 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Kluang



QUOTE(faridaizuddin @ Sep 9 2010, 10:05 AM)
If i'm not mistaken.. samsung already released update for 2.2 for SGS right?
Correct me if i'm wrong..
*
Afaik official firmwares are released yet but its around the corner. Honestly idk hmm.gif
pluginbaby
post Sep 9 2010, 11:19 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,661 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


its been quite long since froyo released and no news bout gingerbread until now except untrusted leaks or rumors
hazremi
post Sep 9 2010, 11:35 PM

1million people saved this avatar bcoz she's too cute!
*******
Senior Member
5,676 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL



based on galaxy S spec, i think the phone will get 3.0 update
bonanno
post Sep 10 2010, 12:48 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
466 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(blur_goofy @ Sep 7 2010, 08:29 AM)
nope.
dun think google is updating android 'too fast'

by the time google announce 3.0  gingerbread officially at the end of the year (rumored) it will take at least a few months to get it ready to release, another few more mnths by manufacturer (htc,samsung etc) to update. should be the right timing..

im guessing gingerbread will be ready by mid next year? hmm.gif
*
no. Nexus one will get 1st. smile.gif
Once google has release the sdk, all dev will start action.. smile.gif

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0353sec    0.43    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 12:06 AM