Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Athlon 140 vs Phenom 940 booting time, windows 7

views
     
TSpikacu
post Jul 24 2010, 12:27 PM, updated 16y ago

male tag rosak
*******
Senior Member
7,740 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Some Yih


Hi folks..its been a while since im here....

i got some question to ask...which is so weird...


I'm using my rig ;

Phenom II X4 940, DFI 790FXB, 4GB DDR2, 3x 320gb 7200rpm HDD..

my windows 7 x64 booting time was like more than 50 sec...which is kinda slow to me. (after windows logo come out)

during my fresh installation of W7 on my rig, the booting was around the same.


recently I build up economy rig for my uncle..here's the spec :

Athlon 140 2.7Ghz (Sempron, single core) , Asus m2N68-AM PLUS, 1GB ram ddr2, 1x 80GB hdd 7200rpm (was mine before)

and i installed windows 7 x86...the booting like was like...less than 15sec...which is darn fast. after windows logo come out)



what the cause of my booting time alot slower than my uncle's rig?


Does number of HDDs play part on my slow booting time?


rclxub.gif

p/s: both use W7 professional, mine using ori key.

This post has been edited by pikacu: Jul 25 2010, 09:53 AM
clon12
post Jul 24 2010, 12:28 PM

let's learn together!
*******
Senior Member
2,911 posts

Joined: Mar 2009



I think it's because you've installed a number of software in your own rig and your uncle's is still fresh.
^KamilskaZ^
post Jul 24 2010, 12:28 PM

roar...roar....
******
Senior Member
1,222 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka



depent what size remaining in primary partition
loki
post Jul 24 2010, 12:29 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,109 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Damai, PJ



QUOTE(clon12 @ Jul 24 2010, 12:28 PM)
"your uncle's is still fresh"
*
SUSXiia0Ban
post Jul 24 2010, 12:29 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,657 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
15sec??This is impressive..can break ssd record...
Maybe due to 32bit or 64bit?
TSpikacu
post Jul 24 2010, 12:41 PM

male tag rosak
*******
Senior Member
7,740 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Some Yih


QUOTE(clon12 @ Jul 24 2010, 12:28 PM)
I think it's because you've installed a number of software in your own rig and your uncle's is still fresh.
*
My own rig doesn't have much software on startup, and not much software installed in it.

I still remember when my PC's was fresh , the booting time ain't this fast, still more than 40sec to get to the welcome screen

QUOTE(^KamilskaZ^ @ Jul 24 2010, 12:28 PM)
depent what size remaining in primary partition
*
Humm..probably? I'll try remove my downloaded stuff to my other partition and see how it goes.

QUOTE(Xiia0Ban @ Jul 24 2010, 12:29 PM)
15sec??This is impressive..can break ssd record...
Maybe due to 32bit or 64bit?
*
Lol...ain't ssd booting time like 10sec?

from open up switch to the welcome screen...was like 16~18sec
the windows loading time itself aroud 13~15

i'm sure abt 32bit vs 64bit here...

kingkingyyk
post Jul 24 2010, 12:45 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,694 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
Fresh Windows 7 leh, bro.
TSpikacu
post Jul 24 2010, 12:49 PM

male tag rosak
*******
Senior Member
7,740 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Some Yih


QUOTE(kingkingyyk @ Jul 24 2010, 12:45 PM)
Fresh Windows 7 leh, bro.
*
Already explained , look post above
bryant601
post Jul 24 2010, 01:19 PM

grrrrrrrrr
******
Senior Member
1,066 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: melaka


try defragment ur HDD and see
Eng_Tat
post Jul 24 2010, 01:23 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,215 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Cheras, KL.


actually you mean from the start of powerbutton to full load window? or after the bios post to full load window? if powerbutton, because ur mobo got more features plus if you got more hdd it takes a times to fully load the feature as well.
TSpikacu
post Jul 24 2010, 01:33 PM

male tag rosak
*******
Senior Member
7,740 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Some Yih


QUOTE(bryant601 @ Jul 24 2010, 01:19 PM)
try defragment ur HDD and see
*
will try that. thanks for the input

QUOTE(Eng_Tat @ Jul 24 2010, 01:23 PM)
actually you mean from the start of powerbutton to full load window? or after the bios post to full load window? if powerbutton, because ur mobo got more features plus if you got more hdd it takes a times to fully load the feature as well.
*
after POST to full load windows
salimbest83
post Jul 24 2010, 01:35 PM

♥PMS on certain day♥
*******
Senior Member
8,639 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Jelutong Penang



QUOTE(kingkingyyk @ Jul 24 2010, 12:45 PM)
Fresh Windows 7 leh, bro.
*
bryant601
post Jul 24 2010, 01:36 PM

grrrrrrrrr
******
Senior Member
1,066 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: melaka


i think its normal tat modern desktop loading time around 30 secs, because the boot settings in the msconfig there set to 30 sec
saturn85
post Jul 24 2010, 01:50 PM

Folding@home
*******
Senior Member
8,686 posts

Joined: Mar 2009



the 30 seconds got relation with it?
bryant601
post Jul 24 2010, 02:36 PM

grrrrrrrrr
******
Senior Member
1,066 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: melaka


it did.. i nvr tried change it before duno wat will happen if the settings there changed
saturn85
post Jul 24 2010, 05:42 PM

Folding@home
*******
Senior Member
8,686 posts

Joined: Mar 2009



but it stated there, timeout: 30 seconds.
i think it won't affect the windows boot time,
since when windows is booting,
it load require files from the harddisk,
not necessary fix the time used = 30 seconds. hmm.gif
cloudwan
post Jul 24 2010, 07:33 PM

- Knob -
*******
Senior Member
8,523 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: The Jungle Of Pahang


Hmmmm been doing some repairs on a few of my office pc recently, what i notice is that in my office pc's that has its system partition with 50% or more free space, the windows loading time would be much quicker even tho the pc's with maybe 30% free space has a slightly bigger rams or better cpu.. hmm.gif

Plus if u can disable any unused items like eg: serial ports, parallel ports etc also..
hengmy
post Jul 24 2010, 08:44 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,991 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Seri Kembangan



You should start compare when the window logo started to come out because different motherboard have difference POST time.
An SSD would take around 10 sec, while a hdd will be around 30sec up to 2 minute depend on the software installed.
beside that, smaller hardisk will boot faster because the file was much easier to access compared to bigger hdd.
herojack41
post Jul 24 2010, 10:14 PM

Master Of Trouble Maker
*******
Senior Member
5,697 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: A Place Where God And Master Of TroubleMaker Exist



QUOTE(hengmy @ Jul 24 2010, 08:44 PM)
You should start compare when the window logo started to come out because different motherboard have difference POST time.
An SSD would take around 10 sec, while a hdd will be around 30sec up to 2 minute depend on the software installed.
beside that, smaller hardisk will boot faster because the file was much easier to access compared to bigger hdd.
*
wah your bapa teach u 1?

means use 20gb hdd will boot faster? doh.gif

then 1tb harddisk nid take forever to boot up? doh.gif
kingkingyyk
post Jul 24 2010, 10:17 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,694 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
Not really wrong at all, just not enough details.
I think he meant partition.
Yes, the smaller the partition, the faster it is.
Samsung SpinPoint F3 1TB, make it 300GB(Empty spaces let it unallocated) vs WD Velociraptor, Raptor will lose.

This post has been edited by kingkingyyk: Jul 24 2010, 10:19 PM

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0226sec    0.68    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 10:17 PM