QUOTE(hihihehe @ Jul 15 2010, 12:56 PM)
but bear in mind that HTC MIGHT drop sense UI for the gingerbread phone because google mentioned that UI on gingerbread is beautiful enough and no need other skin on top of vanilla android..
so depends on google and htc whether they want to put another skin or not
SenseUI is not just a 'skin'. It has a couple of functionality that are otherwise absent on vanilla Android. Try saving widgets placements and settings on a vanilla Android and you'll see what I mean. SenseUI has something called scenes that do just that. Homescreen preview? Not available on pure Android. You'll need a 3rd party launcher to get that. SenseUI is more than just eye candy.
It's not up to Google to decide on skinning. It's up to the users. I get to decide what looks cool on my phone. If I want to be dictated on what my UI should look like, I might as well get an iPhone.
QUOTE(EpsilonStar @ Jul 15 2010, 12:56 PM)
Gingerbread gonna standardise the UI of android...
Android UI is already standard. Will there be anything in Gingerbread that would prevent the phone makers from customizing Android? A new licensing scheme?
I seriously dont see Motorola abandoning Motoblur, Sony halting UXP, Samsung ditching TouchWiz or HTC dropping SenseUI just because Gingerbread is aesthetically appealing. How would these manufacturers compete then? Solely by hardware specs and price? As long as Android stays Open Source, there will be UI customizations by the phone manufacturers, regardless of how beautiful Google vouch the next platform will be. Granted that the proprietary tweaks made by these phone manufacturers is the contributing factor to Android fragmentation problems. However, denying these manufacturer from doing their own branding on the software is not the way to address it. Android will risk losing support from the phone makers. If anything, Gingerbread should provide a middle ground solution of minimizing the fragmentation issue due to proprietary UI layers while still allowing the manufacturers the freedom to define how their Android interpretation would be like. A better interface API perhaps? Something that would make it easier for the manufacturers to port their customized works without touching to lower level codes. I'm pretty sure Google is aware of this.