its a subjective matter, for me, i look at the "bola-bola" bokeh.. non irritating ones would be quite smooth at the edges of the 'bola', without a suddenly brightness increase, the transition outwards will be smooth blends in well with the neighbouring 'bola'.

u have to understand the difference between shutter and aperture blades.. both controls the light, but in different manners. only the aperture blades determines the bokeh

not entirely true. if thats the case, every single lens manufacturer will put 9999 blades into their lens design d...
it also takes into consideration of the lens element design and light transmission path. taking into account diffraction and the physical size of the barrel. balancing weight, diffraction, coma, CA, f-stop and a whole lot others that i cant remember now.

siggie, if u plan to use on NEX, might as well get m42 lenses? going to be manual anyway

f/0.95? how much?

MechaHerc, i think what he meant was, the physical aperture itself in determining the bokeh, not in technical terms..

or maybe i have mistaken his question... anyway, i think both of us had covered both bases d.. hahaha

i f0.95 tak per, important is the 85mm or 135mm

sig, wow.. I can imagine nex videos with sweet zoom focus and defocusing..

Mo0 become Sigma spokesperson d..
anyway Mo0, your baju... my wallet a bit kering, end of the month d

85mm f2 is how much?

---

Added on July 27, 2010, 9:09 pmwhere u guys got the prices from?

This post has been edited by lwliam: Jul 27 2010, 09:09 PM

same sentiments as wha7ever, at that pricing, sony's 85mm wouldnt be able to take the sharpness reign from the sp90 for sure. and for me, 2.8 is still not too favorable for low light.

i'll hold up and see how it turns out 1st before making any conclusions.

Mo0, waiting for u only.. apart from tmr nite, i anytime after work also can

where/when is ok for u?

woops, working on it now

how about now?

its already shorter than the left side profile pics area d wor

like i told u, i have backup... nuke la, i can pull back everything, then from there start the redesign, instead of from scratch but, i guess now is ok edi la

---

Added on July 27, 2010, 11:05 pmeh OT 99 d...

anyways, you guys really opting for the 35mm ar?

This post has been edited by lwliam: Jul 27 2010, 11:05 PM

sig oops, kantoi!

---

Added on July 27, 2010, 11:14 pmsig, the 20/24/28mm 2.8 not enough? or is it u want brighter?

This post has been edited by lwliam: Jul 27 2010, 11:14 PM

yes, with the 35mm on aps-c, its near to our vision field

hahaha, that's the plan

shootkk got one, not cheap though

will work on the siggy button, now i just kopipes from what i have only. good suggestion