Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 53 54 55 56 57 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Nikon D90 V8, Nikon mid-high range DSLR

views
     
jyu_bonk
post Jul 28 2010, 02:15 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
328 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
QUOTE(akagidemon @ Jul 28 2010, 02:00 PM)
if i say shootingi in raw is better then in jpeg would anyone agree with me?
*
i agreed. the con is only because it is large size.
akagidemon
post Jul 28 2010, 02:16 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
453 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Between Reality and Fantasy


hahahaha. i know those type of people," buat apa shoot in raw when in jpeg also looks good, dah la xleh ambik gambar banyak, kena convert lagi lepas tu". hahahhaa. i love raw files.

jyu_bonk
post Jul 28 2010, 02:19 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
328 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
QUOTE(akagidemon @ Jul 28 2010, 02:16 PM)
hahahaha. i know those type of people," buat apa shoot in raw when in jpeg also looks good, dah la xleh ambik gambar banyak, kena convert lagi lepas tu". hahahhaa. i love raw files.
*
rambut sama hitam, hati lain2. tongue.gif
zstan
post Jul 28 2010, 02:21 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



QUOTE(noobie1 @ Jul 28 2010, 01:13 PM)
why are u asking this?? u mean prime lens or zoom lens??
*
sorry sorry i specific a bit.. tongue.gif .. cause this guy took my convo pics i tak syok..wan know wad lens he use..

should be a zoom..

aperture used was f5.6 but max aperture is f3.8..

and he used a 22mm focal length for the shot?

thanks! notworthy.gif
zellleonhart
post Jul 28 2010, 02:24 PM

Stars stars stars
*******
Senior Member
5,075 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(zstan @ Jul 28 2010, 02:21 PM)
sorry sorry i specific a bit.. tongue.gif .. cause this guy took my convo pics i tak syok..wan know wad lens he use..

should be a zoom..

aperture used was f5.6 but max aperture is f3.8..

and he used a 22mm focal length for the shot?

thanks! notworthy.gif
*
obviously a kit lens lor. 18-55 or 18-105 i guess
stsh90
post Jul 28 2010, 02:24 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
824 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: KL


RAW is awesome. haha. d other day I was out shooting, 330 RAW image and still got space. I was using a 4GB memory card. So I dont really see the 'image file size too big' problem
jyu_bonk
post Jul 28 2010, 02:25 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
328 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
QUOTE(zstan @ Jul 28 2010, 02:21 PM)
sorry sorry i specific a bit.. tongue.gif .. cause this guy took my convo pics i tak syok..wan know wad lens he use..

should be a zoom..

aperture used was f5.6 but max aperture is f3.8..

and he used a 22mm focal length for the shot?

thanks! notworthy.gif
*
could be

Sigma 18-125mm F3.8-5.6 DC OS HSM
Tamron AF 28-200mm F/3.8-5.6 XR Di Aspherical (IF) Macro


Added on July 28, 2010, 2:26 pm
QUOTE(stsh90 @ Jul 28 2010, 02:24 PM)
RAW is awesome. haha. d other day I was out shooting, 330 RAW image and still got space. I was using a 4GB memory card. So I dont really see the 'image file size too big' problem
*
agreed. mine use 8gb kan shoot 500++ raw. so size dosn't matter lol.

This post has been edited by jyu_bonk: Jul 28 2010, 02:26 PM
TSkenji_britney
post Jul 28 2010, 02:28 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,734 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: KL / PJ / JB



RAW doesn't necessarily mean big too, jpg may be the same size or slightly smaller than RAW at times also. my 16GB managed to shoot 1.5k shots RAW, the size also not really that big, about 4-8MB.
zstan
post Jul 28 2010, 02:43 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



so its either 18-55/18-105/18-125 la? can't be 28-200 cause he used 22mm ma. laugh.gif

thanks guys. blush.gif
jyu_bonk
post Jul 28 2010, 02:46 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
328 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
QUOTE(zstan @ Jul 28 2010, 02:43 PM)
so its either 18-55/18-105/18-125 la? can't be 28-200 cause he used 22mm ma. laugh.gif

thanks guys. blush.gif
*
i just ctrl+f on mylensdb website and search for 3.8. sorry for the misinformation. smile.gif
mybiebie
post Jul 28 2010, 03:09 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,419 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
raw definately more able to edit in photoshop..
razuryza
post Jul 28 2010, 03:11 PM

\('o')/~fewwwiitttt~\("0")/
*******
Senior Member
5,515 posts

Joined: Jan 2006


QUOTE(mybiebie @ Jul 28 2010, 03:09 PM)
raw definately more able to edit in photoshop..
*
u all wanna be a photographer, or photo editor? rolleyes.gif
zstan
post Jul 28 2010, 03:23 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



QUOTE(razuryza @ Jul 28 2010, 03:11 PM)
u all wanna be a photographer, or photo editor? rolleyes.gif
*
nice one. rolleyes.gif
TSkenji_britney
post Jul 28 2010, 03:35 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,734 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: KL / PJ / JB



QUOTE(razuryza @ Jul 28 2010, 03:11 PM)
u all wanna be a photographer, or photo editor? rolleyes.gif
*
photographer with a pinch of photo editor biggrin.gif still need to adjust WB if necessary.
noobie1
post Jul 28 2010, 03:40 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,538 posts

Joined: Jul 2006


QUOTE(razuryza @ Jul 28 2010, 03:11 PM)
u all wanna be a photographer, or photo editor? rolleyes.gif
*
both rclxms.gif
zio
post Jul 28 2010, 04:25 PM

RAWRR!
*******
Senior Member
4,889 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Kelana Jaya


QUOTE(razuryza @ Jul 28 2010, 03:11 PM)
u all wanna be a photographer, or photo editor? rolleyes.gif
*
Like noobie1, both. tongue.gif
jyu_bonk
post Jul 28 2010, 04:54 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
328 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
Do you edit your pictures?

People who don’t edit their picture are not photographer. For those who got a stand like “if you edit your picture, you are not good” are plain stupid. Definitely they are ignorant about photography fundamental from the film era as most function for photoediting are the function in the darkroom that require you to do adjustment. Else, your picture doesn’t come out at all (in dark room process). If people ask me why should u edit the picture, why don’t just leave it raw? Then I normally answered….why you have to cook your fish? why don’t just eat it in raw?

-quoted from http://blog.saifulnang.net/?page_id=118-

lol, good answer about the fish thingy. biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by jyu_bonk: Jul 28 2010, 04:55 PM
celciuz
post Jul 28 2010, 04:59 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(akagidemon @ Jul 28 2010, 02:00 PM)
if i say shootingi in raw is better then in jpeg would anyone agree with me?
*
Totally agree smile.gif

QUOTE(noobie1 @ Jul 28 2010, 03:40 PM)
both rclxms.gif
*
QUOTE(zio @ Jul 28 2010, 04:25 PM)
Like noobie1, both. tongue.gif
*
Yeap, you need both skills these days.
razuryza
post Jul 28 2010, 05:00 PM

\('o')/~fewwwiitttt~\("0")/
*******
Senior Member
5,515 posts

Joined: Jan 2006


edit kaw2 pun kalo compo tah pape.. blur sana.. blur sini.. pp la camner pun... cantik kah?
celciuz
post Jul 28 2010, 05:07 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(razuryza @ Jul 28 2010, 05:00 PM)
edit kaw2 pun kalo compo tah pape.. blur sana.. blur sini.. pp la camner pun... cantik kah?
*
Seriously, would be appreciated if you type in English or proper Malay. A bit hard to understand to be honest.

126 Pages « < 53 54 55 56 57 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0301sec    0.78    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 10:15 PM