sony offers the best 3D tech in your living room currently and 3Ds is a handheld for chrissakes.

If you cant afford it. don't buy it till the price drops. Simple aint it?
PS3 games will be able to accommodate 3D and non-3D versions in one blu-ray disc.

Jealous much Microsoft and Nintendo?

Home 3D experience is so overrated.

Portable 3D without glasses however, is such a relief if you've done your time experiencing the evolution of consumer 3D tech.

Guess that's why people are so pissed that nintendo pawned everyone else by jumping the technology-suppression-theory by a few years @ 5 year profit plan. Their goes ur expensive show-off investments . Different experience undoubtfully, but one must ask oneself, which one do u think is total reboot and which is an update

Am a Sony+nintendo fanboy too, but fact is, nintendo was the only one who really produced a real innovation, not just another hd update for graphic whores, Har Har hardy har

(flame shield activated)

i watched 3d movies on imax or such. its pretty cool. but its not for everybody coz it gives headaches to some. to me no headache, and i am sure gaming will be a better experience with 3d. but to the masses maybe 3d is not going to be in. but nintendo type of 3d is like the hologram technology that have been around for awhile. the only difference is nintendo make it video hologram. and i am sure the experience will be better accepted by the masses coz it don't give headaches. the only thing is that nintendo 3d don't jump out at u like sony's 3d but that's better to most if it doesn't jump at u so much. so if u ask me, nintendo 3d will catch on easier than sony's. i know it is only for handhelds, but that's besides the point.

i am no fanboy btw. just an opinion.

Sorry, but if you're going to bring 3Ds tech to the TV its not going to happen.

1) Nintendo admitted you have to be directly in front of the screen for the 3D effect to take place.

2) It'll be freaking expensive to put 3Ds screen on a TV. I'd like to see Nintendo do that. Hows that for REAL innovation?

3) Its 2010, and still sub-hd graphics? Who wants to watch sub-hd on a HDTV nowadays? Thats Hardy har har for you

4) 3D or not, some ppl get headaches playing FPS. You'll get used to it after a while like me.

its not the effects la, its the content that's played..

frankly, am still amazed at current perception of graphics/effects are everything rather than the actual content of game/movie/whatever itself. no wonder there's a lot of crappy movies nowadays....

yeah yeah... before someone says it, wii does have a lot of shovel-ware, yet another mario/zelda/metroid game etc etc, but a lot of people still play it anyway right? wonder why.......... and wonder why the DS always ruled the handheld market with its "obsolete" games, it always had 2nd rate graphics by "todays" standards...

yup, 3d on the 3DS from directly in front of the screen sound like common sense, depth perception from an off-centre position will not be right thing to do as the effect wont be as its intended to be

note: best seat in a 3d cinema is always the centre and optimal screen coverage to the ends (left ,right, top n bottom) of your field of vision right? reason being the distortion from the glasses produces a weird effect on things not on screen.

...3D effects is about effective usage of depth to convey the intended message/effect, true?

The point is, when Sony said you must use glasses for 3D it means anything without glasses is meh 3D, don't you get it?

And Sony said you must wear glasses for 3D, other companies cannot invent something 3D without glasses, just because no other company can be that innovative/creative than Sony.

3D is meh. Its like 3D movies with sub standard storyline *coughavatarcough*, its great because of the tech, not the story itself. In gaming terms, Graphic over gameplay. 3D will always be a fad. Every fad will die one day...and again, nintendo will rule the world...

/runs

Get lost you Nintendo fanboy, Sony is the most sincere in bringing the best gaming experience to us all.

Sony is one big arrogant crackhead company that is jealous because they think there are the innovators of everything. They lost this gen console race and lost the 3d tech race with a substandard, small, not powerful, cheap gaming company. all they can do now is tiru, tiru and more tiru(ping pong balls anyone). They are like Apple, blaming everyone but themselves for their flaws.

Gameplay over overzealous graphic machine for me..and it should for the rest of the gaming world.



Sony is a 6.5/10

nintendo also got fanboy?!!

Oh yeah? You go and ask how many PS3 gamers are hardcore compare to Wii gamers. The sixaxis, the dual shock, the PS Move are all aimed at hardcore gamers unlike the lousy button controls you found on NDS and the stupid motion on the Wii. And hardcore gamers appreciate real 3D HD games because they want more from their gaming, casual gamers just play whatever that's cheap. That's also the reason PS3 gamers only play originals unlike the rest because they are hardcore.

You try to compare the sales figures, all PS3 games sold are HD, and coming to 3D HD, how many of the Wii games sold are HD? Not even one copy, and it shows hardcore gamers will choose Sony any other company.

---

Added on July 30, 2010, 12:22 pmSorry, they are just kids who can't afford Sony's technology, so call them fankids

This post has been edited by gundamalpha: Jul 30 2010, 12:22 PM

U make me sick mr, whoever you are, wii games are not even in HD, why compare!!!! Tell me arsewipe, how do you define hardcore and casual. What if the hardcore starts to play cooking mama, so, they are casual now? If sony is so hardcore, why they even think to do the Move..oh..its for the casuals....oh wait..PS3 is for hardcore...getting confused ain't it

And not all PS3 games are in full frontal HD!!!! The so called great Final"where is the grass"Fantasy 13 is not in full HD!!!! My cat is more HD than that Lighting skank. Graphic whores like you make me sick, thinking HD is hardcore, HD is Hard D**k!!!

So you admitted Wii games are not HD. They can't even make HD stuff, what makes you think they can make better 3D stuff compare to Sony? And Move gives you precision aiming, that makes it suitable for hardcore gamers. And just because the grass isn't HD that doesn't mean Sony's 3D capabilty suffers, it's because Square make the grass not HD to put the game into XBox. And for your information sir, anything 720p and above is HD, all PS3 games supports that. What gamers want are progressive advancements, not looking backward and reuse old technologies. Sony is miles ahead of its comeptitors in terms of technology, who would use glasses to get 3D? Only the genius Sony team could come out with stuff like that.

Your argument is like shallow frozen river . they did a test on FF13 graphics, and my oh my...it does not even reach 720p. And is wearing glasses to watch 3D an advancement? I thought not using glasses like the great 3DS is the true technological advancement. Oh, don;t forget about motion gaming..the wii start, like, 4 years ago. No both Sony & M$ wants to jump on the bandwagon. Move is a pingpong ball and kinect..well..skittles hates kinect.

You sir, have prove to us that intelligence can go below 0. Everyone agrees with me. My opinions are cold hard facts. You sir, are just a fanboy.

Thank you.

why does a nintendo fanboy have a ps3 trophy card?

to show you im not a fanboy, im a gamer. Not like mr.alpha who is a sony fanboy.

Someone just cannot see beyond, always think that Wii is so high tech and 3DS is so innovative. Wii copied sixaxis, then Sony came out with improvement called Move. Sony created 3D with glasses, Nintendo downgrade it to single viewer 3D. I'm not a Sony fanboy, but their technologies are way too advance for layman like you to accept, and that's a hot soft fact.

and that is why now ps3 and psp is no.1 in both hardware and software sales. let's not argue with the facts. and don't forget ps2 still leads in sales vs every gaming object on earth. so don't forget who we were.

damn cutchi brad wii fanboys.

this thread is soooo 10/6.5