I wan to choose between this 2 car..which one is more reliable, efficiency, FC wise, safety..

2002 Year Iswara Aeroback with Rm12000 (OTR) Rm210 installment for 5 year

2005 Year Saga LMST with Rm17000 (OTR) Rm252 installment for 7 year. Without power streeling model.

Which one is more smart choice? I just looking for a transport that harass-less and easy to maintain.

generally choose the newer 1 but with proton not sure
some say older 1 better
some say newer 1 better

---

Added on September 28, 2010, 6:20 pmjust want to know is 1st generation saga is 8v year 85 to 87
2nd generation is 12v 88 to 91 ???

This post has been edited by sinister_sid: Sep 28 2010, 06:20 PM

strong geh. but i wan it cold faster

yup......can detect by see front grill and side lamp signal......1st gen is flat.....

---

Added on September 28, 2010, 7:59 pmif wan cold faster...slowing the speed of blower.....

This post has been edited by GMS FearLess: Sep 28 2010, 07:59 PM

.saga LMST macam kosong one but with nice design.suit youngster since u 22 only rite.aeroback will look oldschool..looks abit uncle but after mod a bit still look nice.
for me...definetely i will choose for iswara aeroback 2002
in terms of reliable,efficiency...both is same...same engine..same in everything but just interior and exterior..
FC wise and safety...i think aeroback will perform better.
mind 2 share what is both car colour?mileage?

r u sure both engine extractly the same
lmst FC can go till 550km full tank. highway can get 600+km depend on your right foot

---

Added on September 28, 2010, 8:40 pmchange wira compressor

This post has been edited by wkho555: Sep 28 2010, 08:40 PM

i think mine is wira compressor... got the word wira on it right?

and 500km per full tank... very possible... especially when its new after some time carbon buildup bla bla bla cannot even think of 300km per full tank... hehehe... true anot

[quote=wkho555,Sep 28 2010, 08:29 PM]
r u sure both engine extractly the same
lmst FC can go till 550km full tank. highway can get 600+km depend on your right foot

LMST engine not 4g13p kabeter?x kan proton put injection engine in LMST?
mindset lar bro...coz LMST have ah beng ekzos mar..while aeroback using ori small ekzos..so generally aeroback "should have" better FC compare to LMST..

Ok. Ya. I 22 year old. I more prefer LMST as u say it got sporty design but after consider in term of safety and the other blak blak blak
i feel is kinda foolish if choose a car with nice design but u know it is kinda soft compare with oldest version which is cheaper and more tough.
Btw, the aeroback is Light gold color with mileage around 70K+ and LMST is blue color with 50K+ mileage.

but rm17k for 2005 lmst is a bit pricey..should be around 15k otr(power steering model) ..
P/s: lmst body is more light than normal one but the aeroback is more rigid..

I think the FC is relate about the chassic..since the LMST is more soft than aeroback..so mean more light than aeroback so can perform more nice FC..isn't correct?

---

Added on September 28, 2010, 9:19 pmMight pricey a bit but i not able to find another good condition car with lower price..
Any one can suggest me?

This post has been edited by fool1988: Sep 28 2010, 09:19 PM

---

Added on September 28, 2010, 9:22 pmMight pricey a bit but i not able to find another good condition car with lower price..
Any one can suggest me?

[/quote]

try find in mudah.com.my ..and better buy the latest version of saga lmst..year 2007..that model dun have loud ah beng muffler n have power steering also..

This post has been edited by johannemiir: Sep 28 2010, 09:24 PM

anyhow...i still think aeroback is worth for money.20k mileage price gap rm5k..izit 2002 one come with power steering??
if yes..perhaps u can serious consider it..
..exterior and interior can be change one mar...anytime u can convert exterior to LMST..as long as u have money

[quote=yong88,Sep 28 2010, 09:14 PM]LMST engine not 4g13p kabeter?x kan proton put injection engine in LMST?
mindset lar bro...coz LMST have ah beng ekzos mar..while aeroback using ori small ekzos..so generally aeroback "should have" better FC compare to LMST..

[/quote]
same carb but engine block is slighty diff. LMST hv 2 batch of ekzos. 1 batch in ah beng ekzos and the last batch is same as iswara ekzos. even tyre also hv 2 batch. 1 is sime tyre ans 1 is conti tyre. tahu tak..... i know coz i driving LMST!

---

Added on September 28, 2010, 9:22 pmMight pricey a bit but i not able to find another good condition car with lower price..
Any one can suggest me?

[/quote]

try find in mudah.com.my ..and better buy the latest version of saga lmst..year 2007..that model dun have loud ah beng muffler n have power steering also..

[/quote]
dun think so. last bath onli use iswara muffler and conti tyre.

This post has been edited by wkho555: Sep 28 2010, 10:07 PM

cheer bro ...people was asking for 2005 LMST and a 2002 aeroback...and 2005 LMST come with AH BENG EKZOS..2006 chrome headlamps is wira SE ekzos..after that RM26999 is standard ekzos...i juz give my opinion on 2002 aeroback and 2005 LMST but not 2006-2008 LMST..
come on lar..read over it then bash me..i have no interesting in ur ride..that not my business..coz for me..aeroback,LMSS,LMST is all same..differ in exterior and interior only..regarding the FC...it was mindset..generally people will think small ekzos will gain better FC compare to sport ekzos..
and well...i dun know how slightly diff in engine block?u measure be4?

dun think so. last bath onli use iswara muffler and conti tyre.

[/quote]
last batch use sime tyre maa..i own the last batch one

[quote=johannemiir,Sep 28 2010, 10:16 PM]
dun think so. last bath onli use iswara muffler and conti tyre.

[/quote]
last batch use sime tyre maa..i own the last batch one

[/quote]
lol. they gv me conti

LMST ah beng ekzos with power string owner here ^^

so far until now i dint change any thing only change tire one time, break pad 2 time, fan belt, and timing belt.

other still in good condition, and FC is around RM50 300-350km riding style 110-140kmh every day ^^

judge your self ^^

newer car sure less prob lo, older car need to fog some $$ to fix the wear and tear ^^

fuiyo. tai ko at last speak. somemore with 15inch tyre gain that milage

This post has been edited by wkho555: Sep 28 2010, 10:22 PM

hehe..there no point to argue on aeroback good or LMST good..since the car engine is definetely same and only cosmectic change..
the final dcision is decide by asker..but for me..still aeroback...lolx..