QUOTE(goldfries @ Sep 24 2010, 01:30 PM)
866 has higher Guide Number (stronger flash). generally more features, like being master to the 622. stuff like that. not sure about other details.
you forgot 'more expensive'... kakakakaPhotography *_-_-_*Flash Thread V1*-_-_-*, Lighting Up Photography
|
|
Sep 24 2010, 05:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 25 2010, 01:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
i'd get the TTL... just pay a little more for the flash to 'work' for u.... not u work for the flash. i know a lot ppl will say, use manual is more pro... to me, they are just pro wanna-be. TTL are design to make ur life easier, not harder.
of coz, studio shot are diff, as u have all the time to setup ur lighting and composition, doing it manual give more consistent result.... but in event or birthday party, or wedding, ur mind is so consume into taking photo, u wont have time to think what manual power to use... TTL FTW. |
|
|
Sep 25 2010, 05:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
Alex, honestly, if u have the money to spare, go canon flash. the eTTL is more accurate then nissin/YN ttl. or there is another 3rd party with eTTL is the METZ (slightly more expensive 3rd party, but cheaper then canon ori).
i think u have a question in mind that need answer; when u use M mode on body, the flash TTL still Will Work. meaning it will still find the compensate power level to fire. so u can set M for consistent ambiance light, and let the flash(ttl) find the right amount of light to lit ur subject. but if u set flash to manual, u at least need some experience and guts to use it. because, there might be chance it will go under or over which requires a LOT of work of Post processing, might get a proper AUTO TTL and reduce the post processing. |
|
|
Sep 27 2010, 11:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
|
|
|
Sep 28 2010, 05:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
QUOTE(Victor3010 @ Sep 28 2010, 06:34 AM) Hi guys this is Very Subjective. because it will be affected by shutterspeed, aperture, and iso.It's been a while since I touched my D40, and I feel like picking up photography habit again. With the recent announcement of the SB700, I'm thinking of getting this flash (maybe SB600), I wonder if it would cost less than RM1k, and hope that it will be released by mid-October. Does the guide number difference between the SB600 and SB700 really affects image quality, as I assume that at a distance of more than 15m, the flash output wouldn't be too effective after all. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thank you. D40 has good iso till 800, and assuming standard 5.6 lens. shutter of 1/60(which wont affect flash power yet)... it may reach 15m (example, any given flash) D7000 has good iso till 3200, and who know u using F2.8 lens, shutter of 1/60.... the flash may reach up to 25m because given sensitivity and light absorb rate has increased. Added on September 28, 2010, 5:34 pm QUOTE(freddy manson @ Sep 28 2010, 07:44 AM) Ur talking about the GN (guide number) rite? why not? if given 580ex2 has GN58 (in meter) means at iso100, F1, 105mm zoom, it reaches 58meter.Yes it does affects image quality (but if the picture is already bad in compo, exposure, etc then it won't do much wonder then) because higher GN means stronger output power (ie using 1/1 power on the flash) About the 15m, where did u get the number? Hehe some flash don't even reach 5meter light-effective hahaha let say a 550D has iso3200, F5.6, the flash CAN reach 58meter. 15 meter is nothing. (apply same way if u are Alpha user, with A550 +F58) or even F20 (sonyflash) can reach 20 meter with iso3200, F5.6 This post has been edited by ieR: Sep 28 2010, 05:39 PM |
|
|
Sep 28 2010, 06:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
QUOTE(freddy manson @ Sep 28 2010, 06:04 PM) Eh I tot its in feet not meter..by bad then.. nikon are in feet (read my reply to Goldfries.As what I was saying, I mean people rarely use flash longer than they usually use.. Me myself rarely (if the flash is mounted on d camera body) shoot subject that's 5meter away from me.. A different story if doing off camera flash.. "Does the guide number difference between the SB600 and SB700 really affects image quality, as I assume that at a distance of more than 15m, the flash output wouldn't be too effective after all. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thank you." For SB700 haven't had the chance to try it yet yea, noone shoot taht far, but the power of the flash is need when u do bounce the GN is a way to show how far the power can do, not a comparison of distance... but power Goldfries: nikon GN is in Feet SB900 has 132GN. (it canot be 132 meter so that is in Feet.) so its possible that GN58m... but the Gn feet to M cant be converted directly, because the 132GN is at 35mm iso100. some trial and test show that SB900 fire till 57meter, on 200mm iso100 in other words, the F58 and 580ex2 is more powerful then SB900 (people got mislead that sb900 is more powerful or further in range because of the 200mm zoom) (the mm refer to flash zoom, not lens zoom. and all GN is sensor sensitivity upon using F1 lens) Added on September 28, 2010, 6:32 pmbut our flash is a 50+ watt strobe, we cant compare to a 100watt or 200watt studio strobe... those, if set properly, with proper zoom design head, it can reach pass 100meter GN easily This post has been edited by ieR: Sep 28 2010, 06:32 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28 2010, 06:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
QUOTE(freddy manson @ Sep 28 2010, 06:49 PM) Yes thanks to Victor for bringing up the topic.. it could be, i dont know exact value of 866 GN, but most figure i saw online is GN60 (m)... but then, those several meter makes no diff, because the distance drop drastically at iso100, F5.6 (that is 5 stop) meaning, from 1/1 drop to 1/32Now I need to go and test Nissin Di866's GN.. Hehe Wana know if its really 'stronger' than SB900 This post has been edited by ieR: Sep 28 2010, 07:00 PM |
|
|
Sep 29 2010, 12:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
well, its not distance sensor, but just a TTL sensor with Lens-distance information being calculate intensely(well noone knows the real formula LOL) which they market as i-TTL (nikon) or (e-TTL(II) for canon and ADI for sony)
3rd party flash does not have the intensive formula to retrieve distance as key to accurate exposure (hence why we always encourage people to get original brand flash), but Metz flash (more expensive then Nissin) has license for i/e TTL and ADI. the TTL(pre-flash) will calculate how much light is needed to brighten up the photo, but another thing u have to know is, the TTL relies on the Metering Mode u choose. if u picked spot, the TTL will only fire as much to balance the Ev on the spot only, ignoring all other space(frame). if u pick Multi/wide/(other word mean whole frame) metering, the flash might fire stronger to fill the room with light, that might cause ur subject to be a little brighter then usual. understand the whole basic of ur camera from PASM to Metering EV(aperture,shutter and ISO - the exposure triangle) then only learn flash.... or u can just use AUTO all the way Added on September 29, 2010, 12:26 pm QUOTE(ieR @ Sep 29 2010, 12:25 PM) well, its not distance sensor, but just a TTL sensor with Lens-distance information(retrieve from lens) being calculate intensely(well noone knows the real formula LOL) which they market as i-TTL (nikon) or (e-TTL(II) for canon and ADI for sony) This post has been edited by ieR: Sep 29 2010, 12:26 PM3rd party flash does not have the intensive formula to retrieve distance as key to accurate exposure (hence why we always encourage people to get original brand flash), but Metz flash (more expensive then Nissin) has license for i/e TTL and ADI. the TTL(pre-flash) will calculate how much light is needed to brighten up the photo, but another thing u have to know is, the TTL relies on the Metering Mode u choose. if u picked spot, the TTL will only fire as much to balance the Ev on the spot only, ignoring all other space(frame). if u pick Multi/wide/(other word mean whole frame) metering, the flash might fire stronger to fill the room with light, that might cause ur subject to be a little brighter then usual. understand the whole basic of ur camera from PASM to Metering EV(aperture,shutter and ISO - the exposure triangle) then only learn flash.... or u can just use AUTO all the way |
|
|
Sep 29 2010, 06:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
QUOTE(ComradeZ @ Sep 29 2010, 04:04 PM) Guys which brand is better for flash? on canon mount [550d] ever consider Metz? http://shashinki.com/shop/metz-shoe-mount-...facturers_id=941. Di622 2. YN560 3. YN460II either 1 of these.. which is the best 1? or is it that they own have specialties? I mainly use it for wedding photography and low light hall. Thanks in advance its less power then the model u mention, slightly more expensive, but it has better "e-ttl" accuracy. those model u mention only has TTL which is not consistent. if u wan to go serious with wedding and event shooting, i really advise metz or canon flash, because if u buy those, u will struggle to get right photo then 2-3 month later u surely wan to upgrade to canon flash ohhh... or Metz more powerful model, http://shashinki.com/shop/metz-shoe-mount-...facturers_id=94 in my opinion, this flash is better then 580exII, for the frontfill is very useful(there is another 2nd flash below the main head) QUOTE(limchee @ Sep 29 2010, 04:12 PM) wanna ask about batteries Maha Imedion (2100mAh (oldmodel), (new model) 2400mAh)currently using canon 580 ex ii was using normal alkaline battery, realised that the recycling time was super slow wat kind of batteries should i be using in order to get a faster recycling time? Sanyo Eneloop (2000mAh) these 2 are highly recommended. the new Imedion has 2400mAh(min) are not Hot Seller! grab one now from Shashinki! promotion This post has been edited by ieR: Sep 29 2010, 06:30 PM |
|
|
Oct 6 2010, 07:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
QUOTE(razuryza @ Oct 4 2010, 10:52 PM) if ttl, why need to set anything on the flash? the flash should know automatically from the shutter and aperture of the camera.. if not well expose..i suspect the flash got some of prob..la.. sometimes fire correctly sometimes even no fire at all TTL is a sophisticated math done by the camera body with Lens attach.there is, way to inject new variable (settings) into the sophisticated formula for TTL to mess up the whole lighting if u dont know what u are doing. QUOTE(faareast @ Oct 6 2010, 06:50 PM) yup, but the consistence, not 100% reliable. it works and may give weird result sometimes. |
|
|
Oct 7 2010, 05:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
faareast, i dont have nissin, not sure how nissin works or does it has TTL for WL mode. because nissin was optical trigger, not CLS trigger signal, i doubt it can run TTL
|
|
|
Oct 7 2010, 11:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
kent: i think my answer was weird to farreast... @.@ i think i was saying yup to his question that can WL use TTL.... then 2nd part, i am blur...
i dont have phottix aster, but if the phottix aster i. uses nikon hotshoe mount connector ii. support E-TTL should be can... else, it cant. i amnot sure, check with phottix help file or website. |
| Change to: | 0.0260sec
0.64
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 06:12 PM |