QUOTE(alwinc @ May 20 2010, 10:31 PM)
i see.. hows the retail price for the tamron? by the way.. how does the lens come together with d90? is it really doing badly?
The lens if you get a good copy you're lucky. Price is about RM1850 to RM1950 roughly.QUOTE(t_trax @ May 21 2010, 12:56 AM)
Last I asked is RM2800. Pricey for a third party!QUOTE(amirmunzir @ May 21 2010, 01:03 AM)
so,17-50mm F/2.8 VC tammy not good??
..dangg,dream of owning it everynight..if so,wut r the other option for 17-50mm,aa but within the same value??
..
Nothing close to it at the moment for a f/2.8 fixed lens. Closest is the Sigma, and then the Nikkor 17-55 f/2.8 comes into picture already.QUOTE(luzzio @ May 21 2010, 01:55 AM)
it took about 2 replacements before i was happy with my tammy. if you get a working lens trust me this baby won't make you regret a dime. a beginner or not, getting the 1750 with a constant f/2.8 instead of the kitlens is the best choice. there's hardly any difference at 105 and 50 that a good pp crop can't fix (come on a D90 is 12mgpx). the perspective doesn't change with a crop. you'll feel the crippling disadvantage of the f/5.6 max on the kit soon enough.
the price difference should be somewhere between 500 ringgit last i saw.
not saying a kit lens is bad (i've taken a few pics with the A200 kitlens that im proud of), but honestly the d90's kitlens is just overpriced.
craving for the tamron sp90 tho.
Agreed, if you get a good copy this is one heck of good lens. But if you don't then you're in deep shit. Need to keep exchanging until you get one. I wonder how if the new ones sold are actually refurbished units!the price difference should be somewhere between 500 ringgit last i saw.
not saying a kit lens is bad (i've taken a few pics with the A200 kitlens that im proud of), but honestly the d90's kitlens is just overpriced.
craving for the tamron sp90 tho.
May 21 2010, 06:54 AM

Quote





0.0407sec
0.72
7 queries
GZIP Disabled