Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
21 Pages « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Nikon D90 v7

views
     
celciuz
post May 21 2010, 06:54 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(alwinc @ May 20 2010, 10:31 PM)
i see.. hows the retail price for the tamron? by the way.. how does the lens come together with d90? is it really doing badly?
*
The lens if you get a good copy you're lucky. Price is about RM1850 to RM1950 roughly.

QUOTE(t_trax @ May 21 2010, 12:56 AM)
how bout Sigma?
*
Last I asked is RM2800. Pricey for a third party!

QUOTE(amirmunzir @ May 21 2010, 01:03 AM)
so,17-50mm F/2.8 VC tammy not good?? blink.gif ..dangg,dream of owning it everynight..if so,wut r the other option for 17-50mm,aa but within the same value?? hmm.gif ..
*
Nothing close to it at the moment for a f/2.8 fixed lens. Closest is the Sigma, and then the Nikkor 17-55 f/2.8 comes into picture already.

QUOTE(luzzio @ May 21 2010, 01:55 AM)
it took about 2 replacements before i was happy with my tammy. if you get a working lens trust me this baby won't make you regret a dime. a beginner or not, getting the 1750 with a constant f/2.8 instead of the kitlens is the best choice. there's hardly any difference at 105 and 50 that a good pp crop can't fix (come on a D90 is 12mgpx). the perspective doesn't change with a crop. you'll feel the crippling disadvantage of the f/5.6 max on the kit soon enough.

the price difference should be somewhere between 500 ringgit last i saw.

not saying a kit lens is bad (i've taken a few pics with the A200 kitlens that im proud of), but honestly the d90's kitlens is just overpriced.

craving for the tamron sp90 tho.
*
Agreed, if you get a good copy this is one heck of good lens. But if you don't then you're in deep shit. Need to keep exchanging until you get one. I wonder how if the new ones sold are actually refurbished units!
celciuz
post May 22 2010, 11:02 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(Isepunye @ May 22 2010, 10:51 AM)
outdoor also i shoot with flash guns tongue.gif sometimes flashgun + reflector brows.gif
*
I try to avoid flash gun but reflector once in a while hehe.
celciuz
post May 22 2010, 03:25 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(Isepunye @ May 22 2010, 10:23 AM)
105mm F5.6?
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
105 f/5.6 too,

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Bokeh bokeh biggrin.gif, only possible on close objects though.
celciuz
post May 22 2010, 04:15 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Check for the exterior condition, auto focus with your body to ensure no front/back focus, check for dust inside.
celciuz
post May 24 2010, 07:34 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Was away the whole Sunday from LYN~

Trying out new style for outdoor portraiture,

user posted image
celciuz
post May 24 2010, 09:17 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(vihn @ May 24 2010, 09:15 AM)
to all sifus,for keeping purpose,do we need to remove the lens everytime when we put in the storage box ? I just have the kit lens as for now.
*
If you have only 1 lens and won't be changing it at all, just keep it attached. No need to remove and reattach everytime you put in or take out from your storage.
celciuz
post May 25 2010, 08:25 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
I'm a big fan of silhouette shots and finally here is my own, took this during sun set at Putrajaya.

user posted image

Initially had a lot of flare when I had my UV filter on (Kenko UV, yea... single coated is damn good in producing unwanted flares), removed it but still got a little sad.gif. No nano coating on my 18-105 kit lens T_T.
celciuz
post May 25 2010, 10:28 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(umiseaz @ May 25 2010, 10:19 AM)
great shoot !!!


Added on May 25, 2010, 10:21 amanyone know the price of 50mm f1.4  and 50mm f1.8

f1.8 around RM350 - 400 ?
f1.4 around RM800++ ?
*
50mm f/1.4D I think RM950-RM1000, roughly there.
celciuz
post May 25 2010, 10:34 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
I got my 50mm f/1.8D for RM380 (Melaka pricing), the 50mm f/1.4D can get about RM980 or so I think. But pricing should be better and more competitive at KL I guess.
celciuz
post May 25 2010, 09:01 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
1/200s is the max sync speed of D90.

I think when you use kit lens you're always at 1/60 because not enough light like what the 50mm f/1.8D can do.
celciuz
post May 26 2010, 04:41 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(ReeNz @ May 26 2010, 12:23 PM)
Shutter counts relate to the shutter speed used? i tot one cycle of open-close is considered 1 count (a.k.a taking 1 pic is one shutter count) regardless to the shutter speed used  hmm.gif

Btw, here is my moon shot taken recently
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Nice shot there! Hmm, maybe I should try capturing it again. Full moon now right?
celciuz
post May 26 2010, 08:09 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
I think probably got some cropping done there, cause when I use my 200mm, also see it very small je biggrin.gif
celciuz
post May 26 2010, 08:32 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
300mm TC2X (x2) wahaha! Voila!
celciuz
post May 27 2010, 08:21 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
noobie1, nice shot there. But maybe you can remove your UV filter perhaps. The unwanted flare a bit ugly here :S.
celciuz
post May 27 2010, 09:49 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Alamak, without UV still got so much of those round flares? In that case nothing can be done ba...
celciuz
post May 27 2010, 11:16 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
user posted image

Code it this way,

CODE
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/50541864@N05/4643272521/][img]http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3355/4643272521_788c75cbde_o.jpg[/img][/url]



celciuz
post May 27 2010, 11:28 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Hmm got 2 ways, first is you do it manually. second way is the easier way out to use greasemonkey code (allsize+) for firefox.
celciuz
post May 27 2010, 02:56 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(shawn2k4 @ May 27 2010, 02:38 PM)
I have a very *silly* question i would like to ask. Since everyone in here are D90 users so it should be simple.

A) D90's body has the Auto Focus motor built in, does it mean that we can opt to use Lens which does not have the built in auto focus?

B) VR/Vibration Reduction. This is referring to the feature on the lense. How big of a effect does this VR play? And is it recommended that we opt for lense with VR function? At what scenario would it have the most effect on?
C) I'm currently using the D90 with their standard kit lense of 18mm-105mm . At a certain close distance from the object, it can't seem to focus. Is this due to *Non-Macro* lense?Or is this a Limitation of D90/DSLR as a whole?
All the sifu's please advice smile.gif
*
A) Yes, you can use those older lens which is driven by screw. 50mm f/1.8D is one example.

B) Try shooting at slow shutter with VR ON and OFF, you will get your answer. VR effects a lot for low light condition due to low shutter.

C) The kit lens has a minimum of 0.45m, you can't go any closer than that.
celciuz
post May 27 2010, 03:32 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(maxronaldo @ May 27 2010, 03:18 PM)
good job nice info man!
*
Just sharing what I know biggrin.gif.
celciuz
post May 27 2010, 03:48 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(shawn2k4 @ May 27 2010, 03:39 PM)
Thanks for all the information.

A) Fully understood .

B) For lower lighting conditions most probably you'll be either;
i) using Flash
ii) Using tripod

Thus the functionality of the VR would be nulified right? Correct me if i'm wrong
C) So if we were to use the Macro lense, it shouldn't be a problem right? Hmmm
*
As long you go low shutter, VR helps unless you have it on a tripod which is better to turn off VR. But then again this is for still subjects. If you've VR and low shutter but subject is moving around you won't get a sharp image either.

21 Pages « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0407sec    0.72    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 09:20 AM