Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Nikon D90 v7

views
     
celciuz
post Jul 5 2010, 07:58 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(shinjun @ Jul 5 2010, 07:57 PM)
That's the thing..he just can't seems to understand.

Btw celciuz, nice photo..well exposed and nice framing. smile.gif I see you've been very active in shooting lately. smile.gif
*
This weekend if everything is as planned I might be able to get some good shots xD.
celciuz
post Jul 5 2010, 09:20 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(shinjun @ Jul 5 2010, 08:00 PM)
What your planning for this weekend? Model shooting? smile.gif
*
QUOTE(kenji_britney @ Jul 5 2010, 08:01 PM)
wahlau baby smooth skin  thumbup.gif

this weekend shoot what?
*
Model shooting biggrin.gif At D-Paradis Resort biggrin.gif

QUOTE(zellleonhart @ Jul 5 2010, 08:04 PM)
Wow celciuz, you always have events/models to photoshoot don't you biggrin.gif

How you can be so free ah? no work or study? XD
*
Weekend ok! LOL

QUOTE(General_Nic @ Jul 5 2010, 08:06 PM)
prefer d girl's 'poison' than bokeh poison  wub.gif  tongue.gif
*
Is it.. tongue.gif
celciuz
post Jul 6 2010, 12:26 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(noobie1 @ Jul 6 2010, 12:08 AM)
lolx...bro, both aso got chinese word...so mean both are low quality battery??
btw, those both battery are made in japan...not china...tongue.gif
yup..i know is best to use low iso..but then last i heard, celciuz said D90 iso are best at 200...
*
Lo1.0 etc aren't real 100ISO. Software interpolated. So 200 is still the best native. Unless you really need that sort of sensitivity then I don't know lor!
celciuz
post Jul 6 2010, 12:34 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
One of my favorite xD,

user posted image
celciuz
post Jul 6 2010, 06:42 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Jul 6 2010, 04:59 AM)
Haha, celciuz like emo girls  thumbup.gif
*
Cause she's cute doing that pose! brows.gif Don't you think so? wink.gif
celciuz
post Jul 6 2010, 07:12 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Now, a shot by the 16-35 f/4.

user posted image

This post has been edited by celciuz: Jul 6 2010, 07:12 AM
celciuz
post Jul 6 2010, 08:08 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Hmm, any idea how I can improve it? biggrin.gif. Shooting portrait with UWA is tough =(. My first try out with the 16-35, portraits with telez is just.. easy... only need to take care small portion..

user posted image
celciuz
post Jul 6 2010, 08:33 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Jul 6 2010, 08:26 AM)
I think the problem is the distraction from the random plant in the middle of the rocks on the beach. Those plants at the left side of the picture are quite distracting too.

Perhaps you can move nearer to the girl and occupy her in your picture more? Just my 2 cents smile.gif

2nd picture without those plants are much nicer biggrin.gif

Added on July 6, 2010, 8:28 amFor the 1st picture, if you can lower your camera height i think will help too tongue.gif
*
Noted. When I was shooting I saw that plant out of no where in the middle. Thought I could photochop it away dry.gif. But failed miserably. Didn't notice the ones on the side. Argh~ when angle is wide lots of things need to take note. Need to be more careful on my composition.

One reason I didn't want to go too close is, if I frame her at the edge of the picture distortion comes in already sad.gif. These pics I've not tried adjusting the distortion yet haha.

I like second picture too biggrin.gif. The random tree is directly at the back, lucky shot cause she was walking across haha. Timing was right fortunately. rclxm9.gif
celciuz
post Jul 6 2010, 11:41 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(freddy manson @ Jul 6 2010, 10:08 AM)
Portrait with tele somehow makes u lazy for (better) composure..
U don't have to use 16mm all the way bah..change to 35mm lor..
Heck, I use 8mm FE for portrait mah! (Not all menjadi tapi boleh2 la)
*
Depends on what result I'm looking for I guess biggrin.gif. Good about UWA is you can do really nice angles... lemme see this weekend can dig some or not tongue.gif.
celciuz
post Jul 6 2010, 12:43 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
What's the size and price?
celciuz
post Jul 6 2010, 12:55 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
I think you can actually buy those Hoya HD CPL at that price... Somehow I would go for Hoya instead though.

Btw, this weekend I'll be going for this event tongue.gif

http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/1473000

Anyone else going? xD
celciuz
post Jul 6 2010, 01:09 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(kenji_britney @ Jul 6 2010, 01:01 PM)
oh that event.. lol eat durian until sien tongue.gif and take pic of durian girl

argh all my photos WB so mashed up, set it to tungsten then skin tone is ok but the bg so blue =.=" any advice ar? or have to manually adjust the blue hue also sad.gif
*
No choice, get your subject right. or leave the subject yellowish since that is the event's condition afterall!

QUOTE(C_Sagi @ Jul 6 2010, 01:02 PM)
I never seen anyone posted one in LYN before so I wonder if anyone could provide some feedback to me. But the Hoya HD CPL is not slim filter right ?

Damn, if i didnt went to a durian buffet 2 weeks ago i would join u. Now see durian also scared. sweat.gif
*
LOL, I just noticed this. I'll be attending this event.

I think it is slim... not sure but my friend's 82mm CPL did not had vignetting issue with his 17-35 f/2.8L.
celciuz
post Jul 6 2010, 01:43 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
18mm not wide enough? Might need to consider something like Tokina 11-16 then.
celciuz
post Jul 6 2010, 02:24 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
18-105 IQ not good enough for you now eh?

11-16 f/2.8 might interest you. Else if you want primes, wide one would be 24 f/1.4 which is...pricey. RM6500.
celciuz
post Jul 6 2010, 02:37 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Tsk tsk, your 18-105 must be feeling lonely at the moment =/. Oh wait, I can't recall when's the last time I used my 18-105 either doh.gif
celciuz
post Jul 6 2010, 02:49 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(kenji_britney @ Jul 6 2010, 02:39 PM)
cause you got 70-200 d mah, and new addition to the family 16-35.. can sell off your 18-105 hahaha
*
My gf uses it at times lah now haha. She's learning photography too sweat.gif
celciuz
post Jul 6 2010, 03:11 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(C_Sagi @ Jul 6 2010, 03:00 PM)
I see i see, just checked it. Not slim ler. sad.gif But thanks for the suggestion thou. biggrin.gif

I've been hearing u guys talk about prime lens. Finally ordered one 50mm. Awaiting for its arrival end of this month. Am very excited now. rclxm9.gif
*
No experience with Nikon filters, but I would go for Hoya/B+W anytime over Nikon. (for filters that is).

QUOTE(ryancfs @ Jul 6 2010, 03:05 PM)
thanks, but i prefer not to use flash at such public settings... very impolite i feel... want o be polite but no money wor... how a?... hahaha...

biggrin.gif
*
It is f/2.8 and UWA range, you can easily shoot at slow shutter!
celciuz
post Jul 6 2010, 03:32 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Let's say magnification of 1:1 for a 60mm and 105mm. Basically the 60mm has to go closer compared to the 105mm for the same 1:1 magnification ratio.
« Next Oldest · Photography, Digital Imaging & Video · Next Newest »
 

21 Pages « < 19 20 21Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
 0.0456sec    0.50    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 06:57 PM
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Removal Request
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025  IPS, Inc.