Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Property in Sg Long
|
greenmoon
|
Apr 9 2014, 08:13 AM
|
|
QUOTE(MyDevil @ Apr 9 2014, 08:08 AM) Ya, the bump already slow down the traffic. I just hope they can build an access road to silk highway instead of need to u turn at Twin Palm there to get to the Mines. Or better still, built another road to Bukit Sg Long. this one have to "slow slow wait" early this week, the newspaper reported that SILK and Government had refused the suggestion
|
|
|
|
|
|
greenmoon
|
May 28 2014, 08:10 AM
|
|
QUOTE(titann16 @ May 6 2014, 04:20 PM) Nothing attractive in Sg Long, but I still chose it bcos of exclusive G&G area and pleasant living environment. ya... pleasant living environment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
greenmoon
|
May 28 2014, 08:25 AM
|
|
QUOTE(doomdoom @ May 27 2014, 11:43 PM) the srjkc looks almost complete..when it operate..this area will attract more chinese buyers especially those with family..basically this area got everything.. from primary school to univerisity...wet market, kopitiam, AEON, lots of shoplots....very convenient for family stay... yes...a lot of new condo/ apartments are to be completed in BMC This post has been edited by greenmoon: May 28 2014, 08:26 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
greenmoon
|
May 28 2014, 02:40 PM
|
|
QUOTE(doomdoom @ May 28 2014, 10:07 AM) ya, right now getting new landed launch at sungai long or BMC...mostly condo... landed getting more precious...  i want to buy 1 biji in BMC but now very difficult to loan with bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
greenmoon
|
May 28 2014, 04:42 PM
|
|
QUOTE(danielisme @ May 28 2014, 04:27 PM) Yala , developer already GAO Tim mpkj to approved install traffic light la .. If not their houses no laku u mean PermatX residence developer?
|
|
|
|
|
|
greenmoon
|
May 28 2014, 04:43 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Mr.DC @ May 28 2014, 03:23 PM) I prefer stay at Taman Rakan-Rakan, Taman Bukit Suria, Taman Suria & Cheras Idaman, cos there already have a new traffic light at the Mosque junction but not yet operate. Soon will be suffered with another traffic jam from sungai long to kajang highway but that area is very very very kampung one
|
|
|
|
|
|
greenmoon
|
Jun 5 2014, 11:33 AM
|
|
the sg long chinese primary school is 95% now, intake in sept/okt, will start to operate in 2015 for primary 1+ 2 +3
|
|
|
|
|
|
greenmoon
|
Jun 5 2014, 11:51 AM
|
|
QUOTE(petlu28 @ Jun 5 2014, 11:43 AM) invite prime minister???hahaha
|
|
|
|
|
|
greenmoon
|
Jun 5 2014, 12:03 PM
|
|
QUOTE(gunh @ Jun 5 2014, 11:59 AM) where is the location of this school? persiaran sungai long 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
greenmoon
|
Jun 5 2014, 12:07 PM
|
|
QUOTE(gunh @ Jun 5 2014, 12:05 PM) nearby existing SMK Sg Long? yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
greenmoon
|
Jun 17 2014, 12:31 PM
|
|
school day smoother than holiday???? WHY? Don't Understand
|
|
|
|
|
|
greenmoon
|
Oct 1 2014, 07:57 AM
|
|
QUOTE(danielisme @ Sep 30 2014, 09:19 PM) Sg long still have golf club land about 400 acre . In future they might turn into residential .. no way...the golf club is the icon of sg long
|
|
|
|
|
|
greenmoon
|
Oct 13 2014, 08:02 AM
|
|
KLORR have been approved?
|
|
|
|
|
|
greenmoon
|
Oct 13 2014, 02:30 PM
|
|
i think the interchange from sg long to silk is far more important than KLORR. Can't really see the benefit from that KLORR
|
|
|
|
|
|
greenmoon
|
Oct 13 2014, 03:03 PM
|
|
QUOTE(doomdoom @ Oct 13 2014, 02:56 PM) ya..iremeber there is one furomer complaint that he/she stayed at kajang and work at melati area, avarage spent 1 horu to reach home, with this hgihway, he/she will need spent maybe 15-20 minutes to reach home... well, even with the klorr, she might have to spend RM10/ day on toll fees. so the best solution is to quit the job ad find a new one nearer to her home. haha
|
|
|
|
|
|
greenmoon
|
Oct 14 2014, 10:24 AM
|
|
the interchange to SILK has been rejected by LLM due to : 1. unsafe 2. SILK will rugi (wtf) http://www.chinapress.com.my/node/514550This post has been edited by greenmoon: Oct 14 2014, 10:32 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
greenmoon
|
Oct 14 2014, 10:50 AM
|
|
QUOTE(puchongite @ Oct 14 2014, 10:36 AM) The main issue is item 1, not so much of item 2. To make a U turn, no other bigger construction is needed, it's a cheap way out. I think the proper solution is to build a interchange to join SILK without needing a U-turn. This will be a much more expensive solution. Funding will then be an issue. but how to join sg long to SILK without an U turn?
|
|
|
|
|
|
greenmoon
|
Oct 14 2014, 10:55 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Oct 14 2014, 10:40 AM) 黃田志指出,他們曾建議加影外環大道(SILK)公司,在雙溪龍的收費站前設置U轉處,以方便欲前往無拉港的皇冠城及雙溪龍的居民,無需經過交通較為阻塞的蕉賴11哩 No part in this link mentioned about access road or interchange, only U-turn suggestion is denied. from sg long, u need an u turn to get into SILK otherwise how to join it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
greenmoon
|
Oct 14 2014, 11:04 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Oct 14 2014, 10:54 AM) From SILK (Balang direction), you can enter Sg Long via the access road at Bukit Sg Longwithout waiting for traffic light in front of border of BMC & Sg Long. When exit from the access road, go to the underpass built by Twin Palm and pay RM1/- to Balakong this is from SILK to sg long, in the end we have to pay the toll when we go from sg long to balakong. But how about from sg long to SILK? unless there is a flyover from sg long across SILK highway
|
|
|
|
|
|
greenmoon
|
Oct 14 2014, 11:30 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Palmwalker001 @ Oct 14 2014, 11:09 AM) Flyover definately good however developer won't pay the bill, anyway still don't know why government rejected the access road proposal. i think the initial design is a u turn before sg long toll and sg long interchange will join with the u turn. IF the sg long interchange is located after the toll then it would be meaningless because : 1. toll 2. the interchange has been there already
|
|
|
|
|