Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
How much is ur FPS with ATI HD 4670?
|
TSe2bitz
|
Apr 24 2010, 08:22 AM, updated 16y ago
|
Getting Started

|
Hey guys...i just want to know how much ur FPS with ur Graphic card specially for HD 4670.. mine running 10~7 FPS in 25 man...it super sux..
If u guys used the same Graphic card, can u advice me the setting so i can get max FPS..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggroboy
|
Apr 24 2010, 11:54 AM
|
|
what is your processor and memory
|
|
|
|
|
|
nagflar
|
Apr 24 2010, 12:40 PM
|
|
4670 just and entry graphic card . lower ur graphic setting . disable shadow . etc will imporve the performance .
for better performance
use . HD 4850 above or GTs 250 above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSe2bitz
|
Apr 24 2010, 12:41 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(Aggroboy @ Apr 24 2010, 11:54 AM) what is your processor and memory AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4000+ 2.1 Ghz... kinda old.. and my ram is 2 gig and im running Vista.. Added on April 24, 2010, 12:44 pmQUOTE(nagflar @ Apr 24 2010, 12:40 PM) 4670 just and entry graphic card . lower ur graphic setting . disable shadow . etc will imporve the performance . for better performance use . HD 4850 above or GTs 250 above. I did lower my setting to lowest and my fps become worst... from 10~7 ===> 7~4 and due to this i have shiity dps... just finish ICC 25 gbid.. earn 6K woot  !! This post has been edited by e2bitz: Apr 24 2010, 12:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
JustForFun
|
Apr 24 2010, 08:45 PM
|
|
I think you need more ram... WoW is extremely memory hungry I can have my processor usage at 30++ % and still lag like hell with 2GB ram... not to mention that you're using Vista...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yue
|
Apr 24 2010, 09:23 PM
|
|
WoW is a memory and proc hoggers, they love huge amount of rams and proc L3 cache.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSe2bitz
|
Apr 24 2010, 11:23 PM
|
Getting Started

|
Thx for all the info guys...im gonna try add more ram then..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggroboy
|
Apr 25 2010, 07:18 PM
|
|
It's not the RAM or your graphics card.
Your processor is too slow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yue
|
Apr 25 2010, 07:25 PM
|
|
did i mention L3 cache?
oh yea i did...
|
|
|
|
|
|
leyley
|
Apr 25 2010, 09:55 PM
|
|
is it better than 5670?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yue
|
Apr 25 2010, 10:08 PM
|
|
5670 performance is somewhere near 4770, so no.... 5670 is better than 4670, not the other way around.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ashwin988
|
Apr 27 2010, 12:05 PM
|
|
i am running a hd 3870, and i have no probs with gfx..but.. i do reduce it .. you have to.. you can't max it unless you have a super card like 4850 or above i think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instant_noodle
|
Apr 27 2010, 12:52 PM
|
|
updated mine from 9550 to 3650 and average fp is roughly 50+ and 20+ in lag-laran.
it's your setting mang... try lower the resolution to gain 30%-40% fp
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yue
|
Apr 27 2010, 02:00 PM
|
|
i5 + 4850, everything maxed out = i came
|
|
|
|
|
|
B@rt
|
Apr 29 2010, 03:36 PM
|
|
i5, 4gig ram, 5850, 24" monitor = ayammmmm kambinggggg!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggroboy
|
May 1 2010, 12:08 PM
|
|
WoW doesn't use the extra cores in i5, so you essentially have a slower main proc unless you OC.
An OCed dual-core will give better bang for buck in this game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yue
|
May 1 2010, 01:37 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Aggroboy @ May 1 2010, 12:08 PM) WoW doesn't use the extra cores in i5, so you essentially have a slower main proc unless you OC. An OCed dual-core will give better bang for buck in this game. ya mang i just know! tengs for tellin me that mang... oh mai WTT mah iPaip with Bugatti Veyron.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggroboy
|
May 2 2010, 11:28 AM
|
|
My brother just got a 2nd hand bugatti lol, mid life crisis ftw
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jas2davir
|
May 2 2010, 03:54 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Aggroboy @ May 2 2010, 11:28 AM) My brother just got a 2nd hand bugatti lol, mid life crisis ftw lie properly pls
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quazacolt
|
May 3 2010, 10:07 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Aggroboy @ May 1 2010, 12:08 PM) WoW doesn't use the extra cores in i5, so you essentially have a slower main proc unless you OC. An OCed dual-core will give better bang for buck in this game. the last few patch have WoW ultilizing quads natively by default. prior to that patch, you need to manually check affinity for the remaining cores other than 0 and 1 (your 1st and 2nd dual core, basically) less work on task manager > wow.exe > affinity > check 2 cores > ok  so yeah, WoW does ultilizes quad cores, any more, i wouldnt know since i run on quad only
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggroboy
|
May 3 2010, 10:31 AM
|
|
Well Blue has specifically said that practically everything is on the main core. Only minor sound and various misc processing is offloaded to the other cores. So yeah, fast dual-core is best for WoW.
Those rich jokers should just retrofit the engine to support multicore, at least we don't have to go into this gigahertz arms race just to be able to raid. Even a half-arsed multi-core support would mean we can continue raiding in Cataclysm with just a Q6600.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quazacolt
|
May 3 2010, 10:40 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Aggroboy @ May 3 2010, 10:31 AM) Well Blue has specifically said that practically everything is on the main core. Only minor sound and various misc processing is offloaded to the other cores. So yeah, fast dual-core is best for WoW. Those rich jokers should just retrofit the engine to support multicore, at least we don't have to go into this gigahertz arms race just to be able to raid. Even a half-arsed multi-core support would mean we can continue raiding in Cataclysm with just a Q6600. well its not just the lesser items that are offloaded, i have a x-fi titanium so for sure sound wont be offloaded, if anything its just physx that i dont have a physical card to take over, but WoW isnt too heavy on phsysics anyways rofl and after said patch, all my 4 cores are running at same load btw  and rather heavy too at some 50-70%, as opposed to my XPS lappie's dual core almost constant 100% load rofl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yue
|
May 3 2010, 11:00 AM
|
|
ez mode, affinity 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSe2bitz
|
May 5 2010, 07:54 PM
|
Getting Started

|
well guys, today i bought another 2 gig ram...so my ram are now 4gig... what is the results???... same... i still cant raid well for 25 man lol... getting 10~12 fps... a bit improvement..... i try all the "how to improve FPS in WOW" utube or even website.. still not that big improvement... i should buy new Gphcard...or processor T_T!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instant_noodle
|
May 5 2010, 08:20 PM
|
|
lower your resolution to 1024 x 768
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yue
|
May 6 2010, 12:07 AM
|
|
proc mang, you need proc with L3 cache.
|
|
|
|
|
|
quest_5692
|
May 7 2010, 12:16 AM
|
|
upgrade ur proc, ur cpu is obviously trotheling ur GC. a cheap budget would be AMD phantom 3 core or E8400. shud be able to boost ur performance significantly if nt enuf, OC ur gpu =) my favourite
|
|
|
|
|
|
chc
|
May 8 2010, 10:33 AM
|
Getting Started

|
mine only HD 4550 60fps in 25 man icc, but recently certain boss fight will drop till 3x like 1st boss,sindragosa, don't know why? i didn't use much UI and all resolution=low. but i am plan to buy a new one, once 4.0 release  coz the current one , is damn hot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSe2bitz
|
May 10 2010, 12:09 AM
|
Getting Started

|
i bought HD5770 2 days ago... well, it improve a lot but still, only 15fps in Dalaran with Ultra Mode....and my Bro used my old card which is HD4670 and he get same fps in Dalaran..we go to VH...and my Max FPS are 40~51 while his FPS are around 50~59 ... i was like.. WTH???.....
Then we check Windows Experience Index and i found... my processor score is 4.8 and he is 5.1 ....damnit...now i need to change processor T_T!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quazacolt
|
May 10 2010, 04:34 AM
|
|
QUOTE(e2bitz @ May 10 2010, 12:09 AM) i bought HD5770 2 days ago... well, it improve a lot but still, only 15fps in Dalaran with Ultra Mode....and my Bro used my old card which is HD4670 and he get same fps in Dalaran..we go to VH...and my Max FPS are 40~51 while his FPS are around 50~59 ... i was like.. WTH???..... Then we check Windows Experience Index and i found... my processor score is 4.8 and he is 5.1 ....damnit...now i need to change processor T_T!! if you got money, mobo + icores, else, hunt a 2nd hand c2d + mobo, then once you got money then upgrade again, or use it anyways if ur content with it
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSe2bitz
|
May 10 2010, 10:55 PM
|
Getting Started

|
Im planning to buy new Processor...maybe Phenom II X4 945 3 Gig... and im gonna used my current AM2 motherboard.. i think it should be ok..what u guys think?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quazacolt
|
May 11 2010, 02:41 AM
|
|
QUOTE(e2bitz @ May 10 2010, 10:55 PM) Im planning to buy new Processor...maybe Phenom II X4 945 3 Gig... and im gonna used my current AM2 motherboard.. i think it should be ok..what u guys think? from lyn threads selling for like rm150-300? lol (i sold mine too~)
|
|
|
|
|
|
quest_5692
|
May 11 2010, 03:58 AM
|
|
take 3 cores if u r getting AMD. OC it =)
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSe2bitz
|
May 11 2010, 09:09 AM
|
Getting Started

|
i belive what im going to buy is Quad Processor rite?.. it is much better then 3 Core... i prefer more stable processor coz im not that good in OC anyway...
I live in JB, i cant trade with u guys for the location factor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quazacolt
|
May 11 2010, 09:47 AM
|
|
QUOTE(e2bitz @ May 11 2010, 09:09 AM) i belive what im going to buy is Quad Processor rite?.. it is much better then 3 Core... i prefer more stable processor coz im not that good in OC anyway... I live in JB, i cant trade with u guys for the location factor. quad core so? the clock speeds and cache are so horseshit, i doubt it'd help much for your case at all
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instant_noodle
|
May 11 2010, 11:28 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Quazacolt @ May 11 2010, 09:47 AM) quad core so? the clock speeds and cache are so horseshit, i doubt it'd help much for your case at all aww... you makin' it look bad... let me help: it runs crysis max setting, CRYSIS IN MAX SETTING!!! IT'S AWESOME!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSe2bitz
|
May 11 2010, 11:49 AM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(Quazacolt @ May 11 2010, 09:47 AM) quad core so? the clock speeds and cache are so horseshit, i doubt it'd help much for your case at all What do u mean by " i doubt it'd help much for your case at all"?.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quazacolt
|
May 11 2010, 12:22 PM
|
|
QUOTE(e2bitz @ May 11 2010, 11:49 AM) What do u mean by " i doubt it'd help much for your case at all"?. it means get an intel quad if you REALLY want a quadcore and not shitty AMD
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSe2bitz
|
May 11 2010, 08:17 PM
|
Getting Started

|
yeah...finally 60 fps in DAL with Ultra mode (No shadow) guess not that ultra...  .. cant wait for ICC 25 this weekend..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jarod
|
Nov 23 2010, 12:03 PM
|
|
anyone tried running ultra setting on gtx460? am thinking of getting this card for wow...
|
|
|
|
|
|
gaeria84
|
Nov 23 2010, 02:19 PM
|
|
Set Shadow Quality to 'Low'. It improves performance greatly.
I'm using a HD4650, with everything maxed except shadows. Running at 80-100 fps, 60+ at populated areas & raids.
|
|
|
|
|
|
soitsuagain
|
Nov 24 2010, 09:09 AM
|
|
Yeah I hate shadow priest. Most boring playstyle ever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noyze
|
Nov 25 2010, 10:49 AM
|
|
I dun see what problem you guys are having, I'm running an old skool proc C2D which is already out of production and also the first mobo available in shops when teh C2D was released ( an MSI something). Using 4850 Gfx card, and I run it all on a 32inch Sony Bravia LCD on ULTRA! ( yeah it rocks so much on a 32inch tv). I dun get no problems in raids watsoever! it's AWESOME!!! ( especially with a 32in TV).
Oh btw, did i say it's just AWESOME running on a 32inch TV on 1080p!!
|
|
|
|
|