Photography Micro Four Thirds (m43) User Thread V2, Panasonic G/GH/GFx & Olympus E-P/E-PLx
Photography Micro Four Thirds (m43) User Thread V2, Panasonic G/GH/GFx & Olympus E-P/E-PLx
|
|
Jul 10 2010, 05:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#61
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,662 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
haha i always go to the chendul stall to have a bowl of delicious cendol usually
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 11 2010, 12:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#62
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,662 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
D90 is a medium-high level DSLR already, surely can't compare the tiny m43 cams against the mighty giants. but m43 should fare well against D3000 and D5000.
|
|
|
Jul 11 2010, 01:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#63
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,662 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
QUOTE(frequency @ Jul 11 2010, 01:23 PM) I was once in paradox as well. I'm jumping from PNS camera(Sony DSC-P10 hahaha ) the bad thing about m43 is almost as pricey as medium level dslr M43 or DSLR straight??? After all I' ve choosen M43 for the following reasons: 1) Size - I do hiking often, so need to carry as light as possible 2) Conveniency- I can move around with the camera without carry a big bag. Everything just in a small sling bag. 3) Simplicity - Switch to Auto feature, you can ask any of passerby take the photo for you. DSLR may scare them off 4) Moment + Quality image- I guess this is the primary factor. I don't want to miss out any memorial moment (like family gathering,friend gathering..) - I don't want to carry over 1kg gadget to the event but mean time I still manage to take a quality picture(Better still than PNS) 5) Fashion- I like the design, like thel accesories available with M43 like leather casing. Less geeky look but look yaoyeng ( 6) Casual - Well, I m not prof photo taker and not going to be. The photo just for myself, friends, family not for making money~. 7) Interchangable lens - allow more room to upgrade than PNS and Consumer class camera. a balance point found between consumer-> M43->Big DSLR |
|
|
Jul 11 2010, 03:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#64
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,662 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
QUOTE(gogo2 @ Jul 11 2010, 02:45 PM) wah. hentam so bad ar. but i kinda agree with you. sony's innovation on their products is not practical usually. it would be great if the power button is just a slide button, but they make it a twist button, how innovative is that. same goes to my vaio and i dont wanna mention it already lol. |
|
|
Jul 11 2010, 10:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#65
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,662 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
haha so the press power button is the most practical then
which case are you using mr wuahaha? |
|
|
Jul 13 2010, 11:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#66
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,662 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
QUOTE(davidmak @ Jul 13 2010, 10:44 AM) There is a focus point but its not a point per say. The conventional DSLR uses phase detection for focusing so there are sensors involved. If you see through the viewfinder you will know what I mean. For GF-1, you can adjust the size of the focus area, as well as the location of the focus area. Setting the focus area smaller would make the focus more accurate in this case, i suppose.Cameras like the PEN/GF-1 uses contrast detect focusing but in my opinion they are not as accurate. The E-PL1's focusing is based on an area selected. And that area isn't small/fine enough especially when you're working with a thin DOF. You just want a small point or plane to be in focus. Say if you want to take picture of dogs. Dogs has long nose. And we tend to point the focus area at the dog's face. But the long nose may fool the sensor to make it focus on it. So you get a picture with only the nose in focus but the dog's eyes are slight out of focus due to the thin DOF. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 14 2010, 08:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#67
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,662 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
anybody tried fixing nissin 466 for 4/3 flash? how does it perform? I'm planning to get one for my gf1
|
|
|
Jul 18 2010, 01:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#68
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,662 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
wuahaha, you should have focused on the girls behind in pic 3
|
|
|
Jul 19 2010, 03:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#69
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,662 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
the best lens collection would be:
20mm pancake + 45-200mm tele + 7-14mm wide zoom. but they gonna cost me an arm and a leg T.T |
|
|
Jul 20 2010, 08:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#70
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,662 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
today's star paper review 3 mirrorless cams together: GF-1, EPL-1 and NEX-5. not fair le mention so much of GF-1's weakness but not others (esp. NEX-5)
|
|
|
Jul 25 2010, 03:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#71
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,662 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
unless you are going for motorsport
|
|
|
Jul 28 2010, 06:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#72
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,662 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
way to go panasonic. but would it be useful if use 3d lens to take still pictures?
|
|
|
Jul 29 2010, 09:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#73
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,662 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
lol. the hype of 3d.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 2 2010, 06:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#74
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,662 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
you could see that most of us discussed about pana's 20mm much much more often than oly's 17mm
20mm has higher aperture which is very good for shallow DOF and places with low lighting. |
|
|
Aug 6 2010, 08:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#75
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,662 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
hmm. if taking photo with tele lens in some dinner events surely must have external flash along
|
|
|
Aug 11 2010, 08:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#76
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,662 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
a rangefinder lens? @.@
|
|
|
Aug 12 2010, 10:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#77
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,662 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
|
|
|
Aug 14 2010, 05:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#78
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,662 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
QUOTE(davidmak @ Aug 14 2010, 04:49 PM) Yeah I was wondering the same thing as well. It can't be this bad otherwise night shots would have been very bad. I'm gonna send my camera in next week. can post here the issue u encountered ar? will be a good sharing for us Hey, thanks for trying it out. I read through an E-PL1 article in dpreview and they found hot pixels on their shots including the official demo shots. But they weren't as bad as mine considering mine appear even on normal shooting at high ISO. |
|
|
Aug 20 2010, 08:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#79
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,662 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
QUOTE(Wii_hunter @ Aug 19 2010, 11:00 PM) i have a question, to those who have a GF1 with the panasonic 20mm pancake, how do you compensate for the lack of any IS? I mean, if your hands are shaky/trembling, how do prevent the blur? my hands are very shaky so im afraid that it might blur out the pictures. this is especially towards samurai1337, since i know you use this combo (if i'm not mistaken). how did you and the others get past the lack of IS for that combo? few options to try to reduce blur for lack of IS (applies to all too):- use higher ISO (tradeoff: noise) - adjust shutter speed (tradeoff: would be underexposed if you set higher shutter speed). - make use of timer (2 sec would be great enough if your hands are very shaky when pressing the shutter, try your best to hold it without shaking for 2 sec, ur pic will turn out great. |
|
|
Aug 22 2010, 12:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#80
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,662 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0560sec
0.98
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 11:00 PM |