Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
7 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Micro Four Thirds (m43) User Thread V2, Panasonic G/GH/GFx & Olympus E-P/E-PLx

views
     
hellfire8888
post May 12 2010, 01:32 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,196 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
QUOTE(frequency @ May 12 2010, 02:25 PM)
Exif=Raw file?
Camera =EP-L1
NR= Auto
IS=IS1
Cap filter = Stenzeiser
*
EXIF is information on your jpeg or RAW. the info contain stuff like shutter speed, aperture, iso..usually u right click the jpeg and select property you can see some detail..

NR= auto is fine but what about noise filter setting?

IS= seem fine

Cap filter = KO... <- this is the most cap ayam filter......remove the filter and you will see better results..
hellfire8888
post May 12 2010, 01:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,196 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
QUOTE(frequency @ May 12 2010, 02:35 PM)
thanks bro.  notworthy.gif
wat UV filter u recommend?
*
UV the decent one would be HOYA but hard to get the size ...

noise filter u should set it to LOW.. iso dont use over iso 1600 if possible..

hellfire8888
post May 12 2010, 05:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,196 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
seriously the sone nex look so ugly..

the pros i can think of is:-

1. slighly better noise performance at iso800 and above
2. metal kit lens
3. metal body
4. cheap price

the cons are:-

1. cannot put larger flash..and use propriety port...so cannot mount their bigger dslr flash. no flash hotshoe..
2. cannot AF when mount with existing sony lens even with an adapter
3. is the only camera where the lens bigger than the body. i am talking about E mount lens. not proportional and i doubt the weight distribution is even with lens mounted on it.
4. no build in body IS.
5. panorama mode got lot of artifacts according to cnet review
6. Across most of the frame (especially the corners of course), softness and chromatic aberration are appalling (based on imaging resource sample image)
7. no control dial to switch setting fast.. like change shutter speed or aperture
8. ugly
9. i dont see any slot for electronic viewfinder..
10. no build in camera raw editing like ep1 ep2 and epl1

was looking forward to jump ship to sony mirrorless..really dissapointing...
fail big time..hoping canon n nikon can do a better job with their upcoming mirrorless camera..

hellfire8888
post May 12 2010, 05:53 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,196 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
QUOTE(bllizard19 @ May 12 2010, 06:45 PM)
Guys,

can we mount M42 lens tou e-PL1 without adapter? sorry for the stupid question!
*
u need an adapter..get from SG i heard cheaper..or ebay
hellfire8888
post May 12 2010, 08:38 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,196 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
high iso vs 10 other cons? no way man...
hellfire8888
post May 13 2010, 08:37 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,196 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
QUOTE(gogo2 @ May 13 2010, 09:24 AM)
I think most important is small size and able to take high ISO picture. Other cons is not important for
photography smile.gif
*
dont mislead newbie la..high iso is the last thing to look for in photography... aiyo...u can put statement like high iso is important to you but not photography..

how many magazine cover shoot at more than iso 800? zero?
how many usable sharp shots can you produce at iso 3200 in a bad light environment where most area is dark? 5 out of 100 shots taken?

flash is created for a reason and if a camera do not have basic hot shoe to take external flash and have to rely on the non std sony flash which only god know can bounce or not..then is a turn off and no no...

i would beg to differ ..i will wait for canon/nikon FF mirrorless camera !!
hellfire8888
post May 13 2010, 10:34 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,196 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
fl-50R is used with 70-300 for birding purpose...yes you can use flash with 300mm lens depending on the distance of the subject..


hellfire8888
post May 13 2010, 11:35 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,196 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
yeah we are just discussing..we did not show middle finger like the thomas cup player..


hellfire8888
post May 13 2010, 01:01 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,196 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
high resolution = more battery power.

anyway can i trade in my black ep2 to get silver ep2? arghhh
hellfire8888
post May 13 2010, 01:26 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,196 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
this week cannot ..next week la..
hellfire8888
post May 14 2010, 08:22 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,196 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ May 13 2010, 02:48 PM)
I don't think so lor... for notebooks (which I'm more familiar) at least... they all consume the same power.

What's true is that higher resolution screens cost more money. Now that the NEX (the bigger high res screen, the bigger sensor) is out, it quite obvious now that the margins on the M43 is pretty high.
*
bigger screen and higher resolution would not consume more power?
hellfire8888
post May 14 2010, 10:56 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,196 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
70-300 is needed for thomas cup!!
hellfire8888
post May 14 2010, 04:55 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,196 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
EP-2 now price drop already la..the price u see rm3999 in old price..new old very cheap
hhhahhaha
hellfire8888
post May 14 2010, 05:07 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,196 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
rm3400 is last 2 month price..now i donno
hellfire8888
post May 14 2010, 06:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,196 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
there is no such thing as double IS ..u can only choose one ...so you either turn off the body IS or the lens IS..
hellfire8888
post May 14 2010, 11:02 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,196 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
is like turning on IS when you use a tripod...it will make your foto not sharp and blur
hellfire8888
post May 16 2010, 07:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,196 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
yeah who dont want 40-150 sell to me..muhahha

yeah already mention N time..the AF light would not come out one..unless nissin is so special can come out with AF light on its own..
hellfire8888
post May 17 2010, 08:49 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,196 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
user posted image

mid valley super wide shots
hellfire8888
post May 17 2010, 10:53 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,196 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
QUOTE(Wuahaha @ May 17 2010, 10:06 AM)
Yeah .. I'm a casual shooter .. so no need all tat features .. yet tongue.gif
Nice dude ... wat lens is that ? 7-14mm ? hmm.gif
*
i use 14-42 kit lens for e-p2..

1. select scene mode
2. choose panorama
3. set focal to 25mm (we need to choose the least barrel distortion setting..at 14 is wide but the distortion also greater..)
4. shoot from left to right
5.go back open olympus viewer 2 (f.o.c)
6. Choose panorama function and select the foto u have taken.
7. click stitch
8. crop out unwanted stuff
9. mission accomplish..



hellfire8888
post May 17 2010, 01:33 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,196 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
user posted image

fashion show,.using Oly e-p2 + tilt shift lens...err i mean 14-42

7 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0504sec    0.49    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 07:20 PM