Still don't get it =(

That will need one lens mounted on the body (cuz it cant capture if without lens), then mount another lens infront of that mounted lens reversely, right? just read some tutorial about that

---

Added on April 3, 2010, 12:11 am
how to mount it like that? need a special accessories right?

Yea yea i am also a student.. I still have 1~2months before buying, so i will keep thinking with that in my mind... thanks for everyone's advice, I will take note on that... but most probably i will still get a d90 first because the lenses i have in mind now are all AF-D lenses (50mm 1.8, 35mm f2, 28-80 AF-D)...

words from me..

if u have v limited cash then dun even try and think u must spend it. else, u have no money when u face emergency. this opportunity may close but another will open up in the future

Spam picture




All C&C are welcomed 

feel shy if i saw many ppl using same dslr like me wor.. i prefer to be unique user..

then buy D3x i bet u hardly meet someone using the same model in the whole year

Last night I tried putting AFS 24-70 and sb900 on D90. I found it very hard to balance the camera because the body is too small. The last finger got no where to hold the body.
I think I'll have to put the grip on when using those heavy lens.

hanging a D3s but no lens = cant shoot...  

Should have some quite visible differences between both, even price also big difference
I also dunno wan go for Nikkor or sigmalux now

but the price almost 3x

Does sigmalux really worth the price?
What can the bigger lens contribute to?

Many reviews still say nikkor 50mm f/1.4D sharper than sigmalux.

Nic, don't just tell ppl to get Sigmalux lo, show ppl the real poison result of the Sigmalux ma.

yala nic...where ur sigmalux pic spam??

not used to it?? i willing to help u... lend me for 1 day itz enough... 

the bokeh circle is always lik tat?? with those circular pattern??

Nowadays so active in D90 thread, wanna join D90 thread soon enough la this fellow.

Find one day we go TT, then can borrow his sigmalux and SB900 play

Sp00kY, shoo~~~ go play with ur 5D M2...LOL...
I have to disagree with you to a certain extent.
First of all, the sharpness of the 1.8@1.8 is sharper than the 1.4 (be it D or G)@1.4.
As you stop down to F/2.8, the 1.8 is still sharper than both the 1.4 in the center, but on the corners the 1.4 does better.
Again as you stop down to F/4, the 1.8 is sharper than the 1.4 in the center, but loses out at the corners.

The reason for one not being able to get a sharp picture with a 50mm F/1.8 is the user problem and not the lens issue.
I've had friends who had taken stunningly sharp images with 50mm F/1.8s at 1.8 wide open, even i sometimes do that myself when i really need F/1.8.
Just remember, the DOF at F/1.8 is really shallow, a lot of times you don't get it sharp because of the shallow DOF and not really because the lens ain't sharp.

can go thr without camera body?? XD no camera body... kesian..   

Bro, noob here also... Just happen to know about this particular topic cz it had been discussed before among us only.

Want pic? Spam some.

Don't really bother bout it already now. Who don't want his hot shoe cover can 1 donate to me

i wanna buy 18-105 new/used (good condition). anyone selling ah?