DFI nF3/4 series (LP and Infinity) users come in, Overclocking ability and troubleshooting
DFI nF3/4 series (LP and Infinity) users come in, Overclocking ability and troubleshooting
|
|
Jul 12 2005, 08:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#61
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
u have to set vcore to anything but auto .. then u'll see the vdimm option up to 4v..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 19 2005, 08:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#62
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
not everyone will run fine with 3120..
for TCCD 3072 works great and if i'm not mistaken kakaroto (g.skill rep) said to use 1.95us for benching |
|
|
Jul 19 2005, 02:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#63
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
like i say there is no best tref for any ram.. i tested a few pairs of UTT and a few TCCD and TCC5 and not all of them like the same trefs
3120 is popular for UTT/BH-5 3072 is popular for TCCD/TCC5 i usually try all the trefs when i have time to do extensive testing.. |
|
|
Jul 20 2005, 08:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#64
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
200
enable 2.0 02 <-- if 2 doesn't work change to 3.. cause it's not binned for 2-2-2-x 07 02 07 <-- loosen as well if it's not stable but i don't think it will at stock 16 03 <-- 2 03 <-- 2 02 03 <-- 2 3072 auto enabled auto 0 level 7 <-- try 1 3 5 7 and auto and see which one gives u more stability level 1 <-- try 1 2 or auto 7.0 auto 5ns <-- Read Preamble 256 disable 16 <-- should work fine at stock.. but if u go higher drop it to 8x 07 <-- should work fine at stock.. drop to 4x when u OC it higher disable |
|
|
Jul 20 2005, 09:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#65
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
those settings are for stock tho.. cause some TCCD are not binned for 2-2-2-5.. so some might not run those speeds.. if u have like a 3200xl of F1 modules from G.skill then u can run those speeds or tighter than what kianwee has posted
his RAM is 3200C2v4.1 which is TCCD if he checked it correctly and made sure it's TCCD 3200C2v4.1 4.2 4.3 are TCCx modules... for higher speeds run something like this 200 enable 2.5 3 <-- change to 4 if it's not stable 7 3 7 16 2 2 2 2 3072 1 skew decrease 128 <-- if not stable drive = 1 3 5 7 or auto data = 1 2 or auto .. 3 is too strong MAL = 7 (try 8 or 9 if u plan to do 300HTT or more) dram response time = normal RP = 5 (try 6 or 6.5 and see which one gives u more stability in superpi) idle cycler limit = 16 (loosen it if it's not stable slowly until 256) |
|
|
Jul 23 2005, 12:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#66
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
lol.. that's one problem of the NF4 boards... and the PCI slots as well hehe... i think can jual ur printer in garage sale soon? lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 24 2005, 03:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#67
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
i might give that a go very soon.. have 4 sticks of TCCD on hand now..
|
|
|
Jul 25 2005, 04:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#68
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
check ur venice and look for the stepping..
try some of this flash to 618-2 bios use yellow slots for ram UTT with active cooling i'd say 3.4-3.5 for 24/7 use.. processor on stock heatsink 1.5-1.58max if lazy then i don't think DFI board is suitable for u.. give it some time and tweak it.. |
|
|
Jul 25 2005, 07:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#69
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
QUOTE(chinsc @ Jul 25 2005, 04:45 PM) thx bro~ heh no scolding la.. don scold me like that ma~~ im lazy cuz i cant wait to see how is my new system performs le :-) ok ok, with some of ur advice, ill try. will study more about this new baby set. by the way, the heat issue of the mosfet when switch to 4v vdimm still remain? and the rams temp, must us a heat spreader? or just leave it nude better? thx yo~ go to www.zerowarranty.com and forums .. under motherboard section i posted some links + guide on flashing bios better to cool as much as u can.. nude = good my dfi belum masuk case before hehe |
|
|
Jul 25 2005, 10:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#70
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
the firewall is a piece of crap.. lol don't install it
|
|
|
Jul 28 2005, 03:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#71
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
|
|
|
Jul 28 2005, 09:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#72
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
lol tak boleh answer maybe
|
|
|
Aug 6 2005, 02:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#73
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
the new DFI NF4 SLI-DR is adapting ATI Grouper board's power regulator design so they won't have the JP17 jumper to enable 4v anymore..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 6 2005, 04:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#74
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
|
|
|
Aug 6 2005, 11:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#75
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
it's called RDX200 CF-DR
already been listed http://nintek.com.au/x/Scripts/prodView.asp?idproduct=2251 the Sapphire board is already shipping.. so it will reach retail pretty soon.. ETA for me to get the board myself is in about 2-3weeks.. |
|
|
Aug 7 2005, 09:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#76
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
A64 memory controller does not work with CAS1.5
it only recognises CAS 2, 2.5 and 3 so running 1.5 is more or less useless something for u guys to read about CAS1.5 http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=69242 and to think that a company like Geil actually makes memory modules rated at 1.5-2-2-5 and shows a memtest screenshot with a x4 multiplier and 300mhz 2-2-2-5 is really incredible.. what a big con job.. This post has been edited by babyelf: Aug 7 2005, 09:04 PM |
|
|
Aug 24 2005, 02:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#77
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
QUOTE(Westley @ Aug 24 2005, 01:03 AM) kelvin_hata i think he is quite sure there..u sure??? check the link below... even there is some 1 using 3.3V... http://www.techpowerup.com/memdb/memdetails.php?id=c9 so far i've only seen a few TCCD do high FSB 2-2-2-x timings.. and it's not recommended for 24/7 usage for TCCD 2.6-2.9v is the optimum value.. tho some TCCD weeks can take more voltage and get higher.. and generally giving it more voltage doesn't mean it will give memtest less errors.. undervolting and overvolting can cause alot of errors for TCCD modules.. that is why there is a mod for the DFI boards to have a pot to control vdimm in smaller steps.. and only give the amount of vdimm u need.. you can check bigtoe's testing.. he did 300mhz easy with 2.66v + Samsung TCC5 on a modded DFI board with a pot to fine tune the vdimm |
|
|
Aug 25 2005, 10:30 AM
Return to original view | Post
#78
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
if u have D43 then skip DFI..
hynix + DFI have some issues QUOTE I'm quite sure that most of the tccd doesn't like 3.0V above... some even cause more crash... but for some reason i hv put my vdimm to more than 3V... hving a 2-2-2-5 @ 210 on 2.9V cause more than 1k error on memtest #5. and it would only error free at 3.2V... weird isn't it? TCCD at 2.9-3.0v runs as hot as bh-5 at 3.4v and what's the point running TCCD at 2-2-2-5 anyway? and i'm pretty sure it wouldn't need 3.2v to get 210 2-2-2-5.. the TCCDs i have needs only 2.8v to get 210 2-2-2-5 |
|
|
Sep 1 2005, 12:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#79
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
400mhz shouldn't be hard for 3000+ Venice..
check the stickies for overclocking tips before trying anything urself |
|
|
Sep 2 2005, 01:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#80
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
there will be difference.. but i don't think the difference is much..
the huge difference comes when u want to clock BH-5 modules as the DAGF does not allow more than 3.2v for memory |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0425sec
1.20
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 01:06 PM |