Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V37!, The Orange Legion
|
|
 Mar 17 2010, 02:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
 
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3   
|
QUOTE(signither @ Mar 17 2010, 01:59 PM) wahh.. can transform from tripod to monopod ka?? nice lah.. just joint this week for the lulz.. and why is that?? we demand an explanation!   haha.. mechaherc also joined dy..    guys, i have a question, dunno if this discussed b4, let say we compare 90mm at APC with 135mm at FF with same distance n same F (let say 2.8), will it produce same DOF at the pic? |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 18 2010, 12:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
QUOTE(MechaHerc @ Mar 17 2010, 02:40 PM) just joint this week for the lulz.. bump for my question guys, i have a question, dunno if this discussed b4, let say we compare 90mm at APC with 135mm at FF with same distance n same F (let say 2.8), will it produce same DOF at the pic?  |
|
|
Mar 18 2010, 03:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
QUOTE(albnok @ Mar 18 2010, 02:29 PM) neo_lam: Not cool! The talk is one of the best I'd say. It is, for me, the most inspiring. thanks dude, so thats mean if we want to see how dof at 135 F1.8 at FF in APSC, we need a lens 90 F1.2.. somethin like that izzit?Also my number is in the original post. MechaHerc: No; the 90mm F2.8 on APS-C will produce the same DOF as a 135mm at F4 on FF at the same distance. Shah_15: I like the second picture how she is not in the center. Sure she could be in focus, but at least you have a decent idea of composition.  |
|
|
Mar 18 2010, 03:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
QUOTE(albnok @ Mar 18 2010, 03:34 PM) Yes that is correct. but the shutter speed is different izzit? (according ur reply to destull) FF = 135 F4, SS 1/100 APCS = 90 F2.8 SS 1/100 the FF will produce slightly underexpose photo but the DOF is same. <-- am i rite? |
|
|
Mar 19 2010, 05:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
QUOTE(eddybeh @ Mar 19 2010, 05:05 PM) guys, wat RAW processing software you guys use? any1 can recommend? rite now usin DxO.. very keng liao.. Bibble 5 also not bad.. |
|
|
Mar 19 2010, 05:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
QUOTE(achew @ Mar 19 2010, 05:33 PM) whats ROL? ray of light bro..QUOTE(clivengu @ Mar 19 2010, 05:34 PM) WARNING.. for those thinking Sony flash plastic hotshoes is meant to broken easily and easily replaceable + cheap... better b careful as the replacement can cause up to 50 % the price for a f42. wat if try to fix urself bro? just buy the part only. i think flash not really hard as camera or lens.. i think la.. I ask in Sony service centre for my plastic hotshoes replacement . The lower part is rm 110. ( change d whole lower big portion of d whole flash. Not just d plastic ! Stupid design ) Labour fee is rm 150 . Total of rm 260! For that few mm plastic .I cancel my intention to repair it. I'll just custom made my own stand . Anyway i only use it for wireless flash since my main flash is f58 now... ;( Very disappointed .. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0400sec
 0.61
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 02:23 PM |
Quote