b]Camera Model -canon powershot sx10is [/b]
Lens - -
Aperture - f4.0
Shutter Speed - 1/100 sec
ISO - 80

---

Added on February 19, 2010, 11:48 pmCamera Model -canon powershot sx10is
Lens - -
Aperture - f4.0
Shutter Speed - 1/100 sec
ISO - 80



This post has been edited by ph0bic: Feb 19 2010, 11:48 PM

nice shot there, but if you can brighten up your subject a bit will be a lot nicer.

this is a simple example.


This post has been edited by zorex: Feb 20 2010, 12:15 AM

Can't retrieve my EXIF. Sorry...

eh nvr post the "edited" one?

Carz



1/15s, f5.6 @ 1600 ISO

Canon 400D
Lens - Canon 50mm
Aperture - f1.8
Shutter Speed - 1/60 sec
ISO - 200

Please comment... Thanks my yesterday shoot...

This post has been edited by kpwoon: Feb 20 2010, 03:47 AM

rnd junk shots

the "ant"


1/200s | ISO125 | F10 | 90mm 1:1 and +4 filter

This post has been edited by nicotine: Feb 20 2010, 05:19 AM

It's Kelvin .. he is the first person that use a Nikon D4 in this forum. This guy got some insider giving him gadgets I think. Not to be mess with. For all you know, he could be using a D5!

Sony A200
Lens - Sony 18-70mm
Aperture - f5.6
Shutter Speed - 1/50 sec
ISO - 200

Sony Alpha A350
Lens - Sigma 30mm
Aperture - f2
Shutter Speed - 1/30 sec
ISO - 100

Should have taken from a different angle.

I like the tone, but I feel that if you put the subject (the cute boy and girl) a little bit up, giving it a more eye level look and less 'overhead' would have a better impact. (really couple ar? The boy is cute leh .. )


How slow/fast was your shutter? Looks like got camera shake. Singaporean car, can see. but I think for this shot, if you had turned on the cabin light to give it a little ambient. Could probably remove the dots on the windscreen.


One thing I like and notice about macro photography is that, photographers always like to have the 'body' of their insect blurred. Why? Another important thing is always focus on the eyes. When you look at a living thing, the eyes is always the thing that people look at first. If that's clear, psychologically the picture will look clear. (unless it's really messsed up)

Where's the EXIF?


I like how you frame this, but if you put in a little more butt, would look nicer. ( Unless his butt not nice )


Seen this guy before. I think it's a little under exposed. Especially with people with darker skin tone. Sometimes it's also good to use the adjustment brush on Lightroom to fix it.

Everyone promoting anti cigg campaign and here you are showing a lighted ciggy. I feel that it could be 1 stop or 1/3 stop higher to give it a more brighter look. It kinda lacks the highlights right now.


Nice way, nice colors, but the background a bit off. Something less contrasting would be nice. Secondly is your models, some under the shade, some under the sun. Either get all of them under the shade, or bake them. hehe

Very red, very ong

but the focusing a bit off, if you look at the tip of the mailbox on the right hand side. It's a bit distracting, actually.


The sky is good, the background is good but your foreground is too dark! A fix on Photoshop would definitely make it looks better.




Most of the shots I think is not properly framed. Sorry to say this but it looks very normal.

Example, your first shot, you have got nice lights on the top. Some really good lighting at the center. But the chrismas looking lights on the trees, are way too distrating.

Second shot, I assume your target is the tower, but I find it too distracting with the lights on the right roof. If you are showing the picture as a whole with no certain subjects, then what is that 2 half lantern doing on the left side?

Third, your angle a bit too low, like trying to do upskirt picture like that.


I like the contras that you have on the picture. The highlights and the exposure is just perfect. What I cannot see is what are you trying to show. Remove the blue oil filter on the bottom right side of the picture, it would be better then!


Are you on auto mode on this? or perhaps semi auto? The snow confused the camera, and thought it was over exposed. A quick bump of the exposure should fix the problem. Remove that thing on the left side of the picture too


The kid very cute la, I think it could look better if you don't chop off the head.

---

Added on February 20, 2010, 1:30 pmtry cropping the picture to only the head with the clutter of bubbles and the hand holding the bubble stick. I think that would look much more better than a full body one.


This post has been edited by Utada: Feb 20 2010, 01:30 PM

hehehe..tq2.not easy la to take picture the kid wearing the spec.he so 'nakal'..

With practice, comes perfection. Else, there's shutter spam!

thanks, will try tonight

Camera: Nikon
Exposure: 0.077 sec (1/13)
Aperture: f/2.8
Focal Length: 11 mm
ISO Speed: 800
Exposure Bias: 0 EV
Flash: No Flash

Utada:- TQ for the info.. wil take noted happy cny ya

haha..yup..it suffers from a lil bit of motion blur with my not-so-steady-hands...the shutter was 1/5s..my comfortable zone would be 1/30s and above >.<
actually the original shot was alot brighter..it was my post-processing that causing it to be darken..im suspecting the dots might b dust/sand tho..coz the picture was taken after i drove it for a ride..and there was a lorry with lotsa sands infront of me..lol..my bad for not noticing it in advance..could have remove it during my editing..now lazy already..zzzz..

another point&shoot shot from me..



1/10s
f/2.8
40 mm
iso1600

slightly slanted at the roof..decided not to correct it as the car was straight..

a nice 1 achew! nice colour

Like Fcuk90 say, don't tfk so much lor.