and we can fly only 4 sukhois

nobody else know how to fly those planes

^
but,Convi we have Evo police!!

Kantoi

Sayonara.....

the sukhois that still have the P sticker on it..
the air traffic controller alwiz have to shout.. "beri laluan, beri laluan"

a good try to waste money

what you say makes sense if it's Russian pilots or American pilots of Isreali pilots

in mehrehshia, kulitfication still takes precedence

that is why we only have 4 guys able to fly the sukhois

bertaubat lagi bagus dari membazir , 2012 kambing

why dun combine all the world continent into one...so no need to travel by sea

Don't worry! We have our very own Tanya from Red Alert.

eh dong.. i ma think you got me wrong.
our sukhois pilot clocked flighthours are so pathetically low as compared to other countries' sukhois pilots.. thus i have reason to believe that the combat-readiness still warrants "bagi laluan.. bagi laluan"

this comparison was painfully noted during 2009 lima exhibition.. i'm not referring to the bestest yet.. but our record is too phail-ly low!! think about that.. poor utilization of the country resources.. merely to parking the plane for lulz most of the time.

they got chuck norris support

i always said, the terusan to be built at thailand is good for malaysia and thailand..bad for singapore.....LETS BUILD IT..

org mareshia asyik bermimpi!

U jeles

wall of text but no sos tiram...wat an imagination

u think this is peraduan menulis esei hari kebangsaan ka

Malaysia / Thailand / Laos Boleh !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

thailand wanna potong their own land to destroy singapore??

thailand got very good kam ching with singapore la...
y want help mehleysia destroy singapore.....

LOLZ!

that's why they throw Thaksin away (Thaksin store so much of his and Thailand people money in Singapore.. TEMASEK scandal).. n then after Thaksin got dumped by his own people the new PM invite Malaysia to the South Thailand for economy and other project including this project..

oh well China is the one who have very strong backing on this project! China aim to be world superpower.. and this is among their plan with Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia

oh ada orang mau sos la ye.. ada terlalu banyak sos.. dan intial study sudah mula dijalankan semula tahun lepas 2009 selepas Thaksin kena buang negara dari Thailand, raja Thailand nampaknya mahu sangat projek potong di Selatan Thailand tu dilaksanakan..



antara sos..
http://www.thai-canal.org <-- website rasmi hendak potong di Selatan Thailand tu!! (masa Thaksin dulu lemban je sekarang projek nak on nih!)
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_307155.html <-- China panggil projek ni sebagai laluan mutiara
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?p...0-9-2005_pg4_20 <-- negara India tengah perhati perkembangan projek potong ni
http://www.worldpress.org/Asia/2908.cfm <-- negara China hendak suntik USD200 BILLION supaya projek potong selatan Thailand dapat diteruskan
http://www.2bangkok.com/2bangkok/MassTransit/kracanal.shtml <-- sedikit informasi fast fact mengenai projek potong ni


In Thailand, China is funding the construction of a $20 BILLION canal across the Kra Isthmus. This would allow ships to bypass the Strait of Malacca. China has also set up electronic posts near the Persian Gulf to monitor ship traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.





case study of this South Thailand project have at least 5 main focus
1. Freedom in managing the canal

2. National economy

3. Military Strategic reasons

4. Social & Environmental aspects

Route 2A starts from Baan Ratchagrood – amphur Lungsuan, Chumporn Province
Pros

1. The original line from 325 years ago, in the reign of King Narai the great

2. Short land distance, only 90 Kilometers

3. The route closest to Bangkok (600 Kilometers far from Bangkok)
Cons

1. Close to the Burmese border (about 30 Kilometers from the border) may cause political and national security problems.

2. Outside the International Sea Routes, will have to go around the Cape of Vietnam.

3. Burma can easily develop Industries to compete with Thailand, with the advantage going to Burma by reasons of cheaper wage and cheaper investment cost. Foreigners will turn to invest in Burma instead of Thailand.

4. Geographical problems, there are slips in the Earth’s shell underneath the area causing frequent earthquakes. It may be dangerous to the canal in the future.

5. Water level of the two sides have 2-3 meters difference, a water gate may be necessary.

6. The canal line passes mountain lines and canyons, not appropriate for ports, industrial and special economic zone development.

7. The canal line passes mountains with granite stratums more than 60 Kilometers long making the canal short but expensive to dig.

8. The objective of the canal isn’t for ships to travel to Bangkok but to be an international region joining the Middle East and India to Japan and Korea. The higher the canal line is, the further away the ships have to go around the cape of Vietnam. Making the distance of the route not shorter than the original.



Route 5A from Satool – Songkla Province
Pros

1. The least amount of earth to dig up, making the canal dig cost the cheapest.

2. The water level difference of the two sides is only 0.5 meters

3. The canal line doesn’t cut any mountain lines, the canal line would be in a canyon.

4. In the International Sea route
Cons

1. Close to the Malaysian border, making Malaysia able to develop their industries without having to create a canal. Malaysia will receive more benefits because the canal line is close to Alor Setar and the Malaysia’s central pier (Port Kelang)

2. In the present the population density is very high, may cause problems in transport and handling.

3. The canal line passes Songkla lake (lower Songkla lake) may create a lot of resistance like the

Thai-Malaysian gas line case

4. From geographical research, there are about 11 large rock catacombs in Satool province.

5. The area lower of the canal line is a Thai-Muslim area, more than 80% of the population are Muslims if there is interference from outside of Thailand there maybe problems involving separation and national security in the future.

6. The canal line is close to the Strait of Malacca making the canal line route not different from the original route.

7. Not enough area to develop a special economic and industrial zones.



Route 7A from Trang – Songkla Province
Pros

1. Short, 60 Kilometers of land to dig, combined with the water channel from Kantang to Trang (30 Kilometers) at amphur Yhan Ta Koaw and dig Songkla lake at the Royal sea between Patalung and Songkla (about 20 kilometers) the total distance is about 110 Kilometers

2. Digging 9 Km into the mountain will get rocks to use in the construction

3. After only 5 Km from Songkla on land will be through to the Thai coast with a deep water pier already at Songkla.

4. Songkla Lake can be used as a port to shelter from monsoons.
Cons

1. The canal line overlaps natural water routes from Kantang to Yhan Ta Kaow, it will effect citizens over 30 Kilometers along the line.

2. Senators and Representatives of Songkla Province along with numerous Songkla Lake reservation clubs and citizens of Songkla object in having the canal pass through Songkla Lake.

3. Songkla Province is a high-density population area; the land cost is very high and causes more social problems because the route has a higher Thai-Muslim population than route 9A.

4. Has environmental impacts, the route passes high population areas, important tourist areas along the route.

5. Closer to the Thai-Malaysian border than route 9A.

6. The route passes a mountain line in Trang Province, the mountain is very high, it is 1,200 meters high and 9-10 kilometers long. The only canyon available is the Pabpa canyon, which is too narrow for a canal.

7. Not enough space to develop special economic and industrial zones.



Route 9A from Krabi to Trang to Patalung to Nakorn Sri Tammarat Province
Pros

1. The area is in the center of the southern region and half from Burma to the Malay Peninsula and Singapore. The route doesn’t cause problems in national security (about 700 kilometers away from the Burmese border and about 700 kilometers from Singapore)

2. 95% of the populations in the route and in the area below the route are Thai-Buddhists. Any foreign intervention attempts to cause separation will be hard to do.

3. In the international sea route and capable of building ports to hide from monsoons at both sides of the canal.

4. Fundamental systems are already ready such as the Tungsong cement factory (can produce 8 Mil. Tons/year), Land travel (4 main routes and 2 train routes) and Air travel (close to 3 airports)

5. Has a fresh water source for canal operations and to support industries. Water supply overseen by the Department of Irrigation.

6. Capable of area development, for new towns, special economic zones at three areas, at both canal entrances, and the central area of the canal.

7. Has a low-density population rate, making the cost for transportation and handling cheaper.

8. The water level difference between the two sides is only 25 centimeters.

9. All 23 local district administrations support and cooperate in marking the canal line along the 9A route (there have been 15 meetings held)
Cons

1. The route distance is 120 kilometers which is the longest, 2A (92 kilometers), 5A (102 kilometers), 7A (105 kilometers)

2. 10 kilometer of the route passes a mountain range at the Nakorn Sri Tammarat mountain range.

3. A part of the canal line passes Keuan Kreng Pruh, which is a wet land. If there isn’t proper management, it might cause environmental problems.

<-- perbezaan jarak kalau selatan Thailand di potong nanti, tunggu signal je ni..

kenapa tak percaya ke??

...
negara China akan suntik USD20 BILLION untuk projek potong selatan Thailand ni.. dimulakan dahulu dengan pembinaan Jambatan MALAYSIA-INDONESIA! tak lama lagi Singapura akan masuk semula wilayah Malaysia, boleh ke diaorang tahan.. China sendiri mahu suntik sampai 20 BILLION untuk projek ni nak lawan kuasa eropah dan USA.

This post has been edited by hack3line: Jan 2 2010, 07:11 PM