Malaysia HWBot Super Pi 32M Online Challenge, Competition Officially Closed
Malaysia HWBot Super Pi 32M Online Challenge, Competition Officially Closed
|
|
Dec 17 2009, 10:37 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
837 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Penang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 17 2009, 10:57 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
903 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
will update mine later heheheh.. want to win something too
|
|
|
Dec 17 2009, 11:10 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,812 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: Eden |
Intel 65nm Army Coming In~
*sorry for the noob result (i'm really2 noob in OC ![]() |
|
|
Dec 17 2009, 11:21 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,436 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
nice nice, keep it coming. just a side tip, fresh OS installation and disabling services may help you all get faster timings.
There's actually plenty of tweaks for Super PI 32M, do make use the power of google and discover the fun of tweaking this benchmark. Attention: The current submission method may be changed during midway of the competition for better validation. Do take note. This post has been edited by Sanko: Dec 17 2009, 11:25 AM |
|
|
Dec 17 2009, 11:28 AM
|
|
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu. |
hmm... not so sure whether my after retirement rig is 3.6GHz capable but i'll give it a try in a week or 2...
been busy w/ d house lately... does spi run faster if we kill explorer before start runnin it? someone pls enlighten me as i'm not so familiar w/ spi benchin... This post has been edited by ah_khoo: Dec 17 2009, 11:29 AM |
|
|
Dec 17 2009, 11:31 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
360 posts Joined: Dec 2005 From: Ampang / Kuantan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 17 2009, 11:34 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,436 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
shawnlut: hey man, you are running 4 x 2G setting?
ah_khoo: yes, killing explorer.exe helps. btw, if anyone got time... maybe can check this out. killing explorer.exe vs explorer in Low Priority (via task manager). my previous tweaked OS is faster if set Low Priority than killing it off. but my new one is faster by killing it off. And 99% oc-ers kill it than using the Low Priority method. test test... user85: you missed one CPU-Z screen, lol. re-run so i can update your score. This post has been edited by Sanko: Dec 17 2009, 11:48 AM |
|
|
Dec 17 2009, 11:44 AM
|
|
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu. |
QUOTE(Sanko @ Dec 17 2009, 11:34 AM) ah_khoo: yes, killing explorer.exe helps. btw, if anyone got time... maybe can check this out. killing explorer.exe vs explorer in Low Priority (via task manager). my previous tweaked OS is faster if set Low Priority than killing it off. but my new one is faster by killing it off. And 99% oc-ers kill it than using the Low Priority method. test test... iirc i saw prodigy & prancinghorse kill explorer.exe + set priority to high (or real time, i mite be wrong on this thou) during d benchmark submit @ funan few years back... d process runnin at that moment was at minimal as well... but not all process can be killed, some will cause reboot after bein killed... |
|
|
Dec 17 2009, 11:51 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,436 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
ah_khoo: Yes correct, that's one of the basic tweaks. and also the affinity tweak but here i guess the effect for affinity tweak is minimal cause it's 3.6GHz. setting priority to high/real time effect is almost the same (at least to me). and iirc, setting real time will cause more instability than high priority. or the other way round.
Updated the Submission Guidelines, do take note. Within this week there maybe a little tweaking on the rules and submission guidelines. Please bear with me. This post has been edited by Sanko: Dec 17 2009, 12:00 PM |
|
|
Dec 17 2009, 12:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,812 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: Eden |
QUOTE(Sanko @ Dec 17 2009, 11:34 AM) shawnlut: hey man, you are running 4 x 2G setting? what did i miss? SPD?ah_khoo: yes, killing explorer.exe helps. btw, if anyone got time... maybe can check this out. killing explorer.exe vs explorer in Low Priority (via task manager). my previous tweaked OS is faster if set Low Priority than killing it off. but my new one is faster by killing it off. And 99% oc-ers kill it than using the Low Priority method. test test... user85: you missed one CPU-Z screen, lol. re-run so i can update your score. edit: got it liao. u put my name wrong there~ This post has been edited by uzer85: Dec 17 2009, 01:04 PM |
|
|
Dec 17 2009, 01:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街 |
QUOTE(Sanko @ Dec 17 2009, 08:59 AM) xixo_12: err... i need 4 CPU-Z information tabs its ok... i m just giving an idea to the participants on what to expect =Pbeast921, hilmiangah and OC4/3 : nice, score added kilowatt: i'm still considering whether to include i5/i7 or not. i'll do if the demand is there. and also need to find an extra prize. lol sup3rfly: hehe... need CPU-Z 1.52 and 4 information tabs. so all old SS i guess won't be accepted. will get my system up and run if i got the time... just for fun lol |
|
|
Dec 17 2009, 01:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
717 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: meLaka-kaYheLL |
QUOTE(Sanko @ Dec 17 2009, 08:59 AM) xixo_12: err... i need 4 CPU-Z information tabs ok thx Sanko...hope u can consider it back beast921, hilmiangah and OC4/3 : nice, score added kilowatt: i'm still considering whether to include i5/i7 or not. i'll do if the demand is there. and also need to find an extra prize. lol sup3rfly: hehe... need CPU-Z 1.52 and 4 information tabs. so all old SS i guess won't be accepted. |
|
|
Dec 17 2009, 01:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
335 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: Kuching a.k.a Neko Town :3 |
include i5/i7 bro
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 17 2009, 01:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,436 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
what is holding me back from including i5/i7 is that x58 is a lot faster than p55. during the compy organised by our fellow friend, clon22 (link in 1st post) ... even x58 with dual channel mode is kinda faster 3-4 seconds at least. so if i7/i5 ocers wants to play, it's best to seperate x58 and p55 into different categories. but.... i got limited prizes, and even i managed to find any, it would be even lower end items, lol.
anyway, any other ideas to include i7/i5? honestly, the more the merrier. i got no issue to include. let me discuss with coolice and gang see we still got any prizes/review hardware that can be used as prizes. This post has been edited by Sanko: Dec 17 2009, 01:50 PM |
|
|
Dec 17 2009, 02:22 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,221 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Deneb star |
Anyway,we can only post 1 results or as many as we can?
EG : Result A 18M,Result B 17M. Of course u will pick the best results right? |
|
|
Dec 17 2009, 02:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,436 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
yes. of course, you can submit as many as you can. i'll take the best once the challenge is over. so before CNY you'll know who's the champion. hehe..
|
|
|
Dec 17 2009, 02:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,318 posts Joined: Nov 2006 From: Pulau Sipadan |
QUOTE(Sanko @ Dec 17 2009, 08:59 AM) xixo_12: err... i need 4 CPU-Z information tabs no worries.. that's only for the guidance.. to support this thread beast921, hilmiangah and OC4/3 : nice, score added kilowatt: i'm still considering whether to include i5/i7 or not. i'll do if the demand is there. and also need to find an extra prize. lol sup3rfly: hehe... need CPU-Z 1.52 and 4 information tabs. so all old SS i guess won't be accepted. real result.. i dunno lol.. maybe later |
|
|
Dec 17 2009, 03:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,142 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: who wants to know? |
|
|
|
Dec 17 2009, 03:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,812 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: Eden |
wait i post another, the complete one. try using different setting (with higher ram speed). guess what, got lame score yo. take longer time yo~
wait after work, i post new one. sigh~ does OS make different? XP/VISTA?WIN se7en. |
|
|
Dec 17 2009, 03:33 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,458 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: M A N C A V E |
QUOTE(uzer85 @ Dec 17 2009, 04:31 PM) wait i post another, the complete one. try using different setting (with higher ram speed). guess what, got lame score yo. take longer time yo~ Like bro sanko mention earlier, YES it does dude! come on post also your 940 score! wait after work, i post new one. sigh~ does OS make different? XP/VISTA?WIN se7en. |
| Change to: | 0.0188sec
0.48
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 04:20 PM |