c2d/c2q and amd phenom 2 only please, no i5/i7
Malaysia HWBot Super Pi 32M Online Challenge, Competition Officially Closed
|
|
 Dec 17 2009, 03:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Dec 17 2009, 03:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街
|
some really old results.dont have memory info windows tho.
CPU - Intel C2D E8500 @ 8x450 Mobo - Asus Rampage Formula Remory - 2 x 1GB Team Xtreem OPB Edition Memory Speed - DDR2-1126 4-4-3-4 Time - 12m21.766s  This post has been edited by sup3rfly: Dec 17 2009, 04:06 AM |
|
|
Dec 17 2009, 01:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街
|
QUOTE(Sanko @ Dec 17 2009, 08:59 AM) xixo_12: err... i need 4 CPU-Z information tabs its ok... i m just giving an idea to the participants on what to expect =Pbeast921, hilmiangah and OC4/3 : nice, score added kilowatt: i'm still considering whether to include i5/i7 or not. i'll do if the demand is there. and also need to find an extra prize. lol sup3rfly: hehe... need CPU-Z 1.52 and 4 information tabs. so all old SS i guess won't be accepted.  will get my system up and run if i got the time... just for fun lol |
|
|
Dec 20 2009, 02:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街
|
not sure if anyone face this issue with the new i7 200 x 20 but i dont get 4ghz exact, its more than the 9mhz range of the rule stated. if i set 199 x 20 it would be lower than 4ghz, also over the 9mhz barrier. anyone can verify this???
199 x 20 = 3992, this shd in range... This post has been edited by sup3rfly: Dec 20 2009, 02:37 AM |
|
|
Dec 20 2009, 04:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街
|
|
|
|
Dec 22 2009, 08:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街
|
| sup3rfly | Win XP x32 | Core i7 860 | 199 x 20 | ASUS Sabertooth 55i | 2 x 2GB A-Data XPG Plus Series 2200+ | DDR3-1996 7-7-7-24
 This post has been edited by sup3rfly: Dec 22 2009, 10:10 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 22 2009, 09:58 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街
|
QUOTE(Sanko @ Dec 22 2009, 09:13 AM) nice run there alex. i think you score will stay there for quite sometime if the community do not really get into tweaking. hehe... i m sure ppls here will be able to beat it =)anyway do we need to submit it to hwbot again when the official page is up? |
|
|
Dec 22 2009, 02:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街
|
@dro: only changed the 4 main timings, subtiming all auto
 cl 7-7-7-24-1tguys, notice something in Jibek's results, Win 7 x64 is faster than win XP? settings almost the same except win xp has tighter timing.... thats may b a hint =) |
|
|
Dec 22 2009, 02:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街
|
QUOTE(uzer85 @ Dec 22 2009, 02:26 PM) is that xp 32bit? heard that 64bit is better for 32m spi. u will need to ask the owner.... guess its x32 xp and x64 7... dont know what he did tho... may b xp OS is too dirty xD |
|
|
Dec 22 2009, 06:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街
|
QUOTE(Sanko @ Dec 22 2009, 05:17 PM) syazone: you can always try to clock higher than 3.6GHz personally after this compy. no problem with the pic. just for your info, i re-upload the images all in another server so that there won't be any broken link just in case. wanted to revive my RE + E8600 + A-Data Memory... wonder what damage would it do hrmm.... i'm wondering where's all the C2D/C2Q overclockers. suddenly so silent. sad case.  |
|
|
Dec 22 2009, 06:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member
1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街
|
the memory is a review sample that is borrowed by A-Data =)
very expensive iirc >.<|| |
|
|
Dec 23 2009, 06:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member
1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街
|
damn kena overtake liao... need to run again tonite...
|
|
|
Dec 24 2009, 02:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member
1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街
|
| sup3rfly | Win XP x32 | Ci7 860 | 199 x 20 | ASUS Sabertooth 55i | 2 x 2GB A-Data XPG Plus Series 2200+ | DDR3-1996 7-7-7-20
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 24 2009, 03:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member
1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街
|
QUOTE(Suk @ Dec 24 2009, 03:10 AM) Ok, NewBie 32M test. hi, you should leave the Finish windows on to take the screenshot else the results wont be valid, try to run less aplications before you running the superpi benchmark, this could shave off some time...pls comment. suk | Wins 7 32bit | Ci7 860 | 180x20 | Asus P7P55D | 2x2GB Corsair  |
|
|
Dec 24 2009, 11:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member
1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街
|
yeah... x58 will be faster at least 4 - 5 sec... how i wish i have the 965 with me then i can run that again.... let me try to get hold of it... p6t and 3 x 2gb memory still on hand
|
|
|
Dec 24 2009, 04:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Senior Member
1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街
|
not so soon =D
|
|
|
Dec 25 2009, 09:26 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Senior Member
1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街
|
i am sure someone will overtake me soon la dun worry....
anyway merry christmas!!! =D This post has been edited by sup3rfly: Dec 25 2009, 09:29 AM |
|
|
Dec 25 2009, 11:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Senior Member
1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街
|
QUOTE(syazone @ Dec 25 2009, 10:38 PM) wow wow... make me excited to try... what if it fail? will just fail to boot rite? not burn the ram? very important thing is u need active cooling for that... |
|
|
Dec 26 2009, 01:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
Senior Member
1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街
|
u need to be 4g exact or +-9mhz.... which means u can be 3991 or 4009
|
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 06:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
Senior Member
1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街
|
QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ Dec 27 2009, 05:13 PM) Okay..managed to cut around 40-50 secs.This time with Services Tweaks(turn off services & Apps).It turns out there is only 1 seconds(faster) diff if i end explorer.exe task. good job in shaving the time.... keep up the good work I only overclocked my HT Link and NB Frequency,didnt touch Memory Settings. It turns out my Windows 7 is faster than my nLite Windows XP by 10 seconds(both with same tweaks applied).Strange though - - There are no SS taken though(for the XP) 18:47.477 | AMDAthlon | Win 7 X64 | Athlon II X3 425 | 267 x 13.5 | Gigabyte MA770T-UD3P |2 x 2GB KVR DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1424 7-7-7-15 http://www.mypicx.com/12272009/SPI_32M/ Will find more time to tweak later(school ~.~  )Next post should be tweaking RAM or HTT..Need see 1st - -.It ate alot of time..need patience   |
| Change to: |  0.0330sec
 0.30
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 04:52 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.