I had done my 3rd service. N my Fc had never improved even once. Still the same figure, RM 30 = 120KM+. Even worst after using RON 95 petrol. 100% city driving with always air-con set to minimum n lowest speed fan even during hot afternoon plus never revv more than 3k rpm. You say leh.

mine also same v urs.. a full tank RM54 manage 2 get 240KM oni.. bt my SA told me can adjust the fuel valve.. maybe the valve open 2 big..jus adjust smaller should be ok... but will lost some performance..
my BLM jus a week old oni..

This post has been edited by klng72: Nov 6 2009, 11:01 PM

There are lots of same complaint cases on BLM AT? How about you? Do you experience it?

Hi cyberkid. i'm driving a BLM Auto 09 April with IAFM problem. But i manage to get 280km-3XXkm per Rm55 refuel. I also pure city driving. With daily jam from cheras to Pj. But have to train your right foot and patient la ...

Mine is MT, before I bought my 1st National car, i adi know Proton AT is famous in terms of high FC, and no exception for Saga BLM as well...you can go to browse BLM club thread, BLM AT high FC is not a secret adi...Try to think for that, 1.3L engine for 1000+KG weight somemore AT...

Anyway, RM55 can give me 400-450KM for city drive and 530KM for highway (90-100km/h).

This post has been edited by coolkwc: Nov 7 2009, 09:56 AM

Aiyo,its not how long your petrol can last ,but how FAR you can travel with a full tank!

Like that,I can fill up my car now RM 65 everyday travel 10 km and say my petrol lasted 20 days meaning its damn good FC ah?

1.3 M line Auto
update fuel consumption for my first tank of fuel~
RON95 @ RM1.80/L
4-9-09 RM60 (33.33L) - 240km (city drive 90%)
11-9-09 RM50 (27.77L)- 240km (city drive 90% + raining + peak hour traffic)

RON97 @ RM2.05/L
19-9-09 RM60 (29.27L)- 300km (city drive 60%)
24-9-09 RM60 (29.27L)- 290km
29-9-09 RM60 (29.27L)-262km

RON95 @ RM1.80/L
3-10-09 RM57.20 (31.7L) - 318km
8-10-09 RM55 (30.5L) - 286km
12-10-09 RM55 (30.5L) -280km
17-10-09 RM55 (30.5L) - 320km
21-10-09 RM55 (30.5L) - 297km
26-10-09 RM55 (30.5L) - 320km
30-10-09 RM55 (30.5L) - 338km
2-11-09 RM55 (30.5L) - pending

This post has been edited by noelogy2007: Nov 7 2009, 11:54 AM

Wow,looks quite bad bro ..

if noelogy fc bad den mine worst!!

my first tank of fuel~
RON95 @ RM1.80/L
29-10-09 RM54 (30L) - 240km (city drive)
5-11-09 RM54(30L) - pending

erk... much more higher than my 1.6 persona !

This post has been edited by Xefron: Nov 7 2009, 01:25 PM

of coz la..persona 1.6..blm 1.3...blm underpower...till now,my gf's car fc is around RM55 last for 300km...now 20k ord

ya.. also much more higher than my old accord 1.6 ..

i dn't know abt u
mine is AT
and my full tank can do 440KM or more
simply said....i drive 80KM a day...1 bar will drop
u calculate
try maintaining at 85KM/H where the IAFM is open...the IAFM there is not for decoration

dear all,

so far no choice, i have to accept it, feeling numb already
90% city traffic jam, can go only 280km

sometimes can achieve 330+, i also very happy already (got using higway)

so far, slowly improve la....
just be patient your FC within 5k will improve

when it pass 20k mark... the FC became good...
just see at my fuelly...

This post has been edited by ahucks: Nov 7 2009, 02:40 PM

Using Saga Blm..
Full tank can go to 290.. city driving...
using BHP...

with ron95, fc will become worse lah...aiyoyo...

re u serious?
even my 9 year old iswara ..doing Rm50 for 300KM I also feel pissed..

the campro engine already well known for high FC, buyers should not suprise for this.

sometimes low cc doesn't mean low fuel consumption.

i will go for myvi anytime than saga blm if looking into FC, at least it's a japanese engine with better feedback than campro.

it's time to get a turbodiesel..

more torque, more powerful, lower FC, more reliable than a petrol-powered !

having 3 diesel vehicle in my house, that's what i experienced.

a BMW Turbodiesel, a Isuzu Super-Commonrail diesel, a Mercedes Turbodiesel.

This post has been edited by victor87: Nov 8 2009, 01:51 AM