Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
125 Pages « < 100 101 102 103 104 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V33!, The Orange Legion

views
     
signither
post Nov 16 2009, 03:42 PM

Certified Mutant
*******
Senior Member
3,557 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Republic of Selayang


QUOTE(Wonka @ Nov 16 2009, 03:23 PM)
Woahhh. So hardcore lolx.
*
very thin wor flex.gif
achew
post Nov 16 2009, 03:42 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(Braynumb @ Nov 16 2009, 03:38 PM)
Is it a true macro lens?
*
its a true macro..and from my little google result...this lens shd be pretty sharp..
Wonka
post Nov 16 2009, 03:49 PM

U n k o ™
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: U n k o L a n d


QUOTE(signither @ Nov 16 2009, 03:42 PM)
very thin wor flex.gif
*
How much does it cost?? Really out of budget d if I get that lol.
cjlai
post Nov 16 2009, 04:11 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,631 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong



QUOTE(mcline_007 @ Nov 16 2009, 03:29 PM)
this lens only 1:2.... not true macro lens.... not worth
Kul | Mo0
post Nov 16 2009, 04:14 PM

Cow's Zeiss
*******
Senior Member
3,844 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: Damansara Utama


I had the 50mm version wor. True macro le. LOL.
Uzumaki NaruTo
post Nov 16 2009, 04:15 PM

oro?
*******
Senior Member
4,187 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: sleepy melati



QUOTE(cjlai @ Nov 16 2009, 04:11 PM)
this lens only 1:2....  not true macro lens....  not worth
*
Ahaks i was about to pm you the same thing. So still waiting for sp90 then. sweat.gif
cjlai
post Nov 16 2009, 04:16 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,631 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong



QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Nov 16 2009, 04:14 PM)
I had the 50mm version wor. True macro le. LOL.
*
50mm not useful for bug macro.... for static thing is ok....

not to mention after adding dcr-250 in front.... almost touch the subject
Kul | Mo0
post Nov 16 2009, 04:16 PM

Cow's Zeiss
*******
Senior Member
3,844 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: Damansara Utama


I no interest in macro so dont know much about it. (: No patience also. =p
cjlai
post Nov 16 2009, 04:17 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,631 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong



tat sigma 90mm will get true macro 1:1 with adapter

check here http://www.dyxum.com/lenses/detail.asp?IDLens=276

more macro lens here
http://www.dyxum.com/lenses/results.asp?IDLensType=2

This post has been edited by cjlai: Nov 16 2009, 04:19 PM
Wonka
post Nov 16 2009, 04:18 PM

U n k o ™
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: U n k o L a n d


1 noob question here. Whats Pro1D UV filter compared to normal UV filter?
Uzumaki NaruTo
post Nov 16 2009, 04:20 PM

oro?
*******
Senior Member
4,187 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: sleepy melati



QUOTE(cjlai @ Nov 16 2009, 04:17 PM)
tat sigma 90mm will get true macro 1:1 with adapter

check here http://www.dyxum.com/lenses/detail.asp?IDLens=276

more macro lens here
http://www.dyxum.com/lenses/results.asp?IDLensType=2
*
if going for macro 2:1 then go for sp90? unsure.gif
cjlai
post Nov 16 2009, 04:24 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,631 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong



QUOTE(lightning69 @ Nov 16 2009, 12:03 PM)
Those shots looks very soft.  I have a Helios 44-2 and 44M and I find it not very useful.  The shots always seems out of focus.  Not sure its my skill or the lens. hmm.gif.

I think its better to buy the Sony 50mm f1.7 which should be much better yet easier to use.
*
shooting with 58mm @ F2 will hv shallow DOF hence the pic will look softer.... try to stop down n try again....
try to get a AF confirm chip adapter to assist plus a Pentax O-ME53 1.2x Magnifier to help up if u using A300/A350 to do MF


Added on November 16, 2009, 4:26 pm
QUOTE(Uzumaki NaruTo @ Nov 16 2009, 04:20 PM)
if going for macro 2:1 then go for sp90? unsure.gif
*
most of the lens for Sony/MA mount are 1:1 which they call it true macro lens....

2:1 can only get with Minolta AF 3x-1x 1.7-2.8 Macro
http://www.dyxum.com/lenses/detail.asp?IDLens=199

This post has been edited by cjlai: Nov 16 2009, 04:27 PM
Uzumaki NaruTo
post Nov 16 2009, 04:29 PM

oro?
*******
Senior Member
4,187 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: sleepy melati



QUOTE(cjlai @ Nov 16 2009, 04:24 PM)
shooting with 58mm @ F2 will hv shallow DOF hence the pic will look softer....  try to stop down n try again....
try to get a AF confirm chip adapter to assist plus a Pentax O-ME53 1.2x Magnifier to help up if u using A300/A350 to do MF


Added on November 16, 2009, 4:26 pm
most of the lens for Sony/MA mount are 1:1 which they call it true macro lens....

2:1 can only get with Minolta AF 3x-1x 1.7-2.8 Macro
http://www.dyxum.com/lenses/detail.asp?IDLens=199
*
whats the ratio for sp90? is it any different with a 55200 lens?
cjlai
post Nov 16 2009, 04:29 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,631 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong



QUOTE(Uzumaki NaruTo @ Nov 16 2009, 04:15 PM)
Ahaks i was about to pm you the same thing. So still waiting for sp90 then. sweat.gif
*
not so say must buy SP90 for macro... but it is the lens commonly use in this thread/forum....

for tat range u can oso choose fr Sony 100mm, Minolta 100mm, Sigma 105mm
achew
post Nov 16 2009, 04:30 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


the link in alphanatics..he is selling with the adapter thingy right..so i assume its 1:1 =p

but stil..if let me choose it..i'll probably get tamron/minolta..whichever its easier/cheaper to get

This post has been edited by achew: Nov 16 2009, 04:30 PM
cjlai
post Nov 16 2009, 04:30 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,631 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong



QUOTE(Uzumaki NaruTo @ Nov 16 2009, 04:29 PM)
whats the ratio for sp90? is it any different with a 55200 lens?
*
wat kind of ratio r u talking about?

magnification for SP90 is oso 1:1 true macro lens
Kul | Mo0
post Nov 16 2009, 04:33 PM

Cow's Zeiss
*******
Senior Member
3,844 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: Damansara Utama


Uzumaki NaruTo : How can compare SP90 with 55200 oh? 1 is prime macro lens 1 is telephoto zoom lens. Totally different league.
Uzumaki NaruTo
post Nov 16 2009, 04:33 PM

oro?
*******
Senior Member
4,187 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: sleepy melati



QUOTE(cjlai @ Nov 16 2009, 04:30 PM)
wat kind of ratio r u talking about?

magnification for SP90 is oso 1:1 true macro lens
*
which lens needed to get your level of macro lor.

QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Nov 16 2009, 04:33 PM)
Uzumaki NaruTo : How can compare SP90 with 55200 oh? 1 is prime macro lens 1 is telephoto zoom lens. Totally different league.
*
Ah. thanks for clarifying. total noob here. Having problem focusing the eye (due to tinyness) with 55200. Thats why want to know more.

This post has been edited by Uzumaki NaruTo: Nov 16 2009, 04:35 PM
cjlai
post Nov 16 2009, 04:37 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,631 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong



QUOTE(Uzumaki NaruTo @ Nov 16 2009, 04:33 PM)
which lens needed to get your level of macro lor.
Ah. thanks for clarifying. total noob here. Having problem focusing the eye (due to tinyness) with 55200. Thats why want to know more.
*
u need a true macro lens.... later can add the dcr-250 to it to gain more magnification power.... smile.gif
Kul | Mo0
post Nov 16 2009, 04:41 PM

Cow's Zeiss
*******
Senior Member
3,844 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: Damansara Utama


For stationary objects you could get 30mm or 50mm la. But if bugs most like need 100++. (:

125 Pages « < 100 101 102 103 104 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0434sec    1.07    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 07:24 PM