yup, besides POHD is not branded to me anyway... so no argument about brands here..

what is ACryan first media player product? 2years already in this line, but the 1st product is still POHD right? and POHD mini is basically shrinked but same POHD chipset and function but removed int hdd rite?? so only 1 product in media player in market also considered established?

anyway really I dun see how POHD is branded??

---

Added on January 6, 2010, 12:37 amI didn't pijak branded type, only those who think they are established brands but are not...



This post has been edited by ar188: Jan 6 2010, 12:37 AM

This post has been edited by ar188: Jan 6 2010, 12:47 AM

for me, I don't think it's branded. and you are the authority to say POHD branded? when it's not even designed themselves?

ok, based on your definition, then POHD is branded , but same as Egreat or BlueAngel.. so what's the big deal.. POHD is in the same boat as them... got brand.. why you think POHD is branded and others are not?

besides I didn;'t not say Branded means must have own design and manufacture.. but without that advantage of design/manufacture, what's the big deal about this particular brand that elevate it above other china branded media players?

This post has been edited by ar188: Jan 6 2010, 10:37 AM

err.. I think ppl are saying no need to think about brand, you are the one who first insisted on POHD being branded and others is no brand...
and now you +1 support no need it to be branded issue? if that's the case, then you trying so hard to differentiate POHD from the other china brands?

so looks like 1073DD cannot bitstream HD audio anymore? sigh! time to upgrade!

I think 1073 is being blocked from doing it... maybe 1283 not blocked?

summer, peace regarding the previous posts...

hope your insider can find a solution.. if can settle both HD audio can consider POHD also..

your etrayz sell me USD59 la.. I buy you RM10 hotel teh tarik no problem..

haha! jump ship

I think he means playing HD files.. the video quality for realtek is lower than sigma..

already got posted sigma vs realtek image comparison side by side previously... realtek is much softer video quality..

it was pretty bad... I think azbro saw it too that's why he mention it again about video quality..

can;'t remember the link liao.. if got, will post later, maybe azbro can dig it up again...

not the color issue.. it's the resolution...

---

Added on January 8, 2010, 11:59 am



guess which is which..

This post has been edited by ar188: Jan 8 2010, 11:59 AM

no need to mention also know la.. the one with the purple block in the upper picture is realtek lor..

that's because you are used to the realtek by now..

plug in the WDTV live or other sigma based chip immediately you can see the difference... few fellas here have both units, difference is noticeably clear..

yours WDTV live? wah dont want, then sell cheap cheap to me lor..

I guess if you ok with it then nothing to regret.. (unless like Matrix movie, can awake and can choose red or blue pill)

tested 300A, 34H at Mpyw's place with KURO and also his dune (sigma). realtek is noticably softer.. and same feeling as the realtek H10 and H16 units..

please differentiate between F/W and SDK.. if all use the same SDK version then decoding quality , GUI function should be similar, and the other parts of the F/W is for window dressing (or the skin) /other additional apps . the color controls were unlocked due to using new SDK, previously can't control this section even with how many hundred firmware update..