master bedroom.
see, the thing is, they took advantage of the situation where the previous owner have left the country. now it becomes a he says she says moment. but whatever it is, thats between them. even if they want deposit back if the previous owner didn't give them, i cant give 'cos thats not the deal.
the deal was they rented the room for one year. until september 30th. after which, since they do not have any agreement, they should just fark off. but i dont like to to do that to ppl, especially after she called and asked to say for a few days. i said fine, but since im stalling for people who'd like to rent the room, she should pay pro rata la. "ill consider it" is the answer.
that does not fly with me. im the owner, youre the renter. i dont mind a little give and take, but once your rights oversteps mine, i choose me.
and the fact that you say one thing today and a different thing the next, makes it problematic. and do you think these type of people would consent for an agreement even if i shove it in their faces? if i ask for a copy of their I/C?
so yeah, its not illegal, but its NOT RIGHT.
QUOTE(moody5 @ Oct 6 2009, 05:14 PM)
what is MBR?
landlords would have received 3 x monthly rental for advance before the tenants moved in, two months rental and one month deposit. The deposit is meant for those run down which caused by the tenants.
But when you take over the house that time, did the previous owner pass / mentioned about it? I guess u took over the house with a fair prices including those things which were left to you, right?
Added on October 6, 2009, 5:38 pmone more thing, the other tenant from the previous owner agreed to pay me pro rata as well, and i did not have any problem with them. i have to be fair to both, i cant say "oh sorry, shes only overstaying for 4 days so she doesn't have to pay, but since you guys staying for 15 days you have to." that's not right nor fair to everyone.
This post has been edited by morpheuse: Oct 6 2009, 05:38 PM