Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 91 92 93 94 95 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V32!, The Orange Legion

views
     
freddy manson
post Oct 21 2009, 01:00 PM

ðñê hêll ð£ å gµ¥
*******
Senior Member
4,858 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Tawau, Sabah



QUOTE(Hinika @ Oct 21 2009, 12:52 PM)
MY INTERNAL FLASH (BUILT-IN) WILL FIRE WHEN SHOOT WITH F42 IN WIRELESS MODE, ANYWHERE TO MAKE THE INTERNAL FLASH NOT FIRE IN WIRELESS MODE ? O.o"
*
maybe u can use a diffuser, and paint the diffuser black... but it'll give a strange 'glow' on the pics..
coz the pop-up flash have to be fired to trigger the wireless flash

vmad.gif so frustrated bout this also..

another way is to have another flash (like f20, a simple one) on ur SLR and bounce it upwards... icon_rolleyes.gif
electron
post Oct 21 2009, 01:22 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,329 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
so the f20 can be used to trigger the f42/f58 when paired with a200-300 series?

tanjq87
post Oct 21 2009, 01:23 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(freddy manson @ Oct 21 2009, 01:00 PM)
maybe u can use a diffuser, and paint the diffuser black... but it'll give a strange 'glow' on the pics..
coz the pop-up flash have to be fired to trigger the wireless flash

vmad.gif so frustrated bout this also..

another way is to have another flash (like f20, a simple one) on ur SLR and bounce it upwards...  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
i think f20 only capable to trigger other flash on a850/a900 body.
hafeez71
post Oct 21 2009, 01:32 PM

/// CleaN ISO \\\
****
Senior Member
538 posts

Joined: Sep 2008



QUOTE(Hinika @ Oct 21 2009, 12:52 PM)
MY INTERNAL FLASH (BUILT-IN) WILL FIRE WHEN SHOOT WITH F42 IN WIRELESS MODE, ANYWHERE TO MAKE THE INTERNAL FLASH NOT FIRE IN WIRELESS MODE ? O.o"
*
QUOTE(freddy manson @ Oct 21 2009, 01:00 PM)
maybe u can use a diffuser, and paint the diffuser black... but it'll give a strange 'glow' on the pics..
coz the pop-up flash have to be fired to trigger the wireless flash

vmad.gif so frustrated bout this also..

another way is to have another flash (like f20, a simple one) on ur SLR and bounce it upwards...  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
Taken From First Page of the Thread

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Poadster
post Oct 21 2009, 02:52 PM

inspiRED: Fast and Furious
****
Senior Member
647 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


Guys (esp the WX1 owners),

I am looking for a PnS to complement my Alpha for times when bringing the Alpha is not viable.

Am considering between Sony WX1 vs Panny LX3, which would be a better option in PQ and features? I hear great things of the LX3 (clarity, fast lens, bokeh, etc) but any comparison with WX1??

Price wise Sony WX1 is better at 1200 (+4GB card) while LX3 can reach 1500 (+4GB card).

Thnx for any suggestion.
tanjq87
post Oct 21 2009, 02:59 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


WX-1 ISO performance is better than LX3, the high iso capability outperforms (compensates) LX3 F2.0 lens compared to WX-1 F2.4 lens.

WX-1 has the sweep panorama mode which you cannot find in LX-3.

However, you can control more setting on LX-3 easily since it has more dedicated buttons.

Feature wise, I would choose WX-1 over LX-3, since you already have an SLR, so you don't really need the full manual control.
mcline_007
post Oct 21 2009, 03:16 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
394 posts

Joined: Oct 2008



some spam

(1)
user posted image
(2)
user posted image
(3)
user posted image
(4)
user posted image
(5)
user posted image

Braynumb
post Oct 21 2009, 03:39 PM

Yea, Still Broke
******
Senior Member
1,409 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Somewhere Over There...


QUOTE(mcline_007 @ Oct 21 2009, 03:16 PM)
some spam

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
dude... have to say... awesome pictures... very nice indeed... thumbup.gif thumbup.gif
mcline_007
post Oct 21 2009, 03:49 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
394 posts

Joined: Oct 2008



QUOTE(Braynumb @ Oct 21 2009, 03:39 PM)
dude... have to say... awesome pictures... very nice indeed...  thumbup.gif  thumbup.gif
*
thanks buddy.. notworthy.gif
Braynumb
post Oct 21 2009, 03:57 PM

Yea, Still Broke
******
Senior Member
1,409 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Somewhere Over There...


care to share the settings for no 1,2 and 4? no 4 seems over contrasted, but somehow, works for it... biggrin.gif
electron
post Oct 21 2009, 04:02 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,329 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Poadster @ Oct 21 2009, 02:52 PM)
Guys (esp the WX1 owners),

I am looking for a PnS to complement my Alpha for times when bringing the Alpha is not viable.

Am considering between Sony WX1 vs Panny LX3, which would be a better option in PQ and features? I hear great things of the LX3 (clarity, fast lens, bokeh, etc) but any comparison with WX1??

Price wise Sony WX1 is better at 1200 (+4GB card) while LX3 can reach 1500 (+4GB card).

Thnx for any suggestion.
*
hi,
you can see some comparison shots between the WX1, LX3 and also canon S90 here:
http://thoots.zenfolio.com/

mcline_007
post Oct 21 2009, 04:17 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
394 posts

Joined: Oct 2008



QUOTE(Braynumb @ Oct 21 2009, 03:57 PM)
care to share the settings for no 1,2 and 4? no 4 seems over contrasted, but somehow, works for it... biggrin.gif
*
bro is not SOOC. i did some PS work. but anyway...
pic1 : exposure 1/40sec, ISO:100, F4.5
pic2 : exposure 1/160sec ISO:100, F5.6
pic4 : exposure 1/60sec ISO:100, F5.6
Braynumb
post Oct 21 2009, 04:27 PM

Yea, Still Broke
******
Senior Member
1,409 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Somewhere Over There...


hehehe... knew that there were some PP done... very vivid the colors... and nice bokeh too... what lens? kitty?
mcline_007
post Oct 21 2009, 04:37 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
394 posts

Joined: Oct 2008



QUOTE(Braynumb @ Oct 21 2009, 04:27 PM)
hehehe... knew that there were some PP done... very vivid the colors... and nice bokeh too... what lens? kitty?
*
55-200mm. still learning bro...need to shoot more sweat.gif
flashout
post Oct 21 2009, 04:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
82 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: Penang


i like the photo no 1. And tough it was original. But very nice indeed. Btw, which model u using?
mcline_007
post Oct 21 2009, 04:52 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
394 posts

Joined: Oct 2008



QUOTE(flashout @ Oct 21 2009, 04:45 PM)
i like the photo no 1. And tough it was original. But very nice indeed. Btw, which model u using?
*
A200
freddy manson
post Oct 21 2009, 05:28 PM

ðñê hêll ð£ å gµ¥
*******
Senior Member
4,858 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Tawau, Sabah



owh never try doing somthing like that with my 55200 sad.gif

going to, soon.. when got the time..
lildaredevil906
post Oct 21 2009, 05:53 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
357 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: PJ/KL


i like pic no4.. the colors arent normal, but thats the beauty of it..
jimlim007
post Oct 21 2009, 06:22 PM

Enoch
*******
Senior Member
4,073 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


my new camera bag have reach ... ouh... pretty bulky laugh.gif
achew
post Oct 21 2009, 06:33 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(jimlim007 @ Oct 21 2009, 06:22 PM)
my new camera bag have reach ... ouh... pretty bulky  laugh.gif
*
i also thinking of buying another bag...my crumpler can hardly fit my 850+2470+f58 >.<


This post has been edited by achew: Oct 21 2009, 06:37 PM

126 Pages « < 91 92 93 94 95 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0294sec    0.42    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 06:43 AM