Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Discussion Premier League bring in home grown quotas, From next season onwards

views
     
TSblinky
post Sep 15 2009, 12:15 PM, updated 17y ago

Relax, just trust me.
*******
Senior Member
2,633 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


QUOTE
The Premier League has announced that from next season every team must name a squad of 25 players, of which eight must be home grown.

A home grown player is any player who has played for an English or Welsh club for three years before their 21st birthday.

At present every Premier League club already passes the test, though Chelsea and Liverpool both have the bare minimum of eight.

In addition, there will be tighter controls on the spending of top flight clubs.

Premier League chief executive Richard Scudamore revealed: "As of next season clubs will be required to have a squad named of up to 25 players, of which no more than 17 can be over the age of 21 and not home grown.

"The definition of home grown is trained for three years under the age of 21 by somebody in the English and Welsh professional system. Clubs will have to declare their 25 at the end of August when the window shuts and then again at the end of January.

But Scudamore was quick to rubbish suggestions that the rule would encourage Premier League clubs to sign foreign teenagers to train in their Academy for three years.

"It's not in the club's interests to stockpile players. It will make buying home-grown talent more attractive,'' he insisted. "We're not going down the route of a nationality test but what this will mean is that you just can't buy a team from abroad.

"We think it will give clubs an extra incentive to invest in youth. We think that one of the benefits will be that it will help the England team.''

The Premier League will also introduce strict new controls on clubs' finances.

"They will all have to annually submit accounts and future financial information,'' said Scudamore. "At all times the board of the Premier League will be applying a test which basically says this: can the club fulfil its fixtures, pay off its creditors when they are due and also to meet obligations to the Premier League's contracts and partners?

"If the board believe a club is at risk of not meeting those obligations, it has to then step in and agree a budget for the running of that club. Any transfers can be embargoed. It's absolutely crucial that these clubs are run as ongoing viable concerns. These financial rules apply immediately.

"This is tied in, and we passed the rule during the summer, to a 'fit and proper person test'. At our club meeting last week, the clubs absolutely endorsed our position of not linking expenditure to income.''


Source: Soccernet


It doesn't say if it's going to be La Liga-style where a team can only register a maximum of 25 players, or a team has to register a minimum of 25?

This post has been edited by blinky: Sep 15 2009, 12:16 PM
driftmeister
post Sep 15 2009, 12:16 PM

Penggadai Rakyat®
*******
Senior Member
4,133 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cameron Highlands Rank: Amateur
more and more kakuta case will happen yawn.gif yawn.gif yawn.gif
Ichighost
post Sep 15 2009, 12:26 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
358 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Oxpod



nope lah...foreigner will leave epl...and 3 years at British club is considered okey lah...
Wan
post Sep 15 2009, 12:57 PM

Glory Hunter
Group Icon
Elite
4,174 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Gua


Not all.

Clubs can name 17 non HG players. 8 have to be U-21/HG.
I'm still confused. Does that mean the limit is 25 players able to be registered and play at any season? That would be crap.
account_manager
post Sep 15 2009, 01:30 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: Kuala Lumpur


hmmm, since when Welsh club is considered as home grown player ehhh?
beck_ken
post Sep 15 2009, 01:32 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,716 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


QUOTE(account_manager @ Sep 15 2009, 01:30 PM)
hmmm, since when Welsh club is considered as home grown player ehhh?
*
Wales is part of the United Kingdom if not mistaken
account_manager
post Sep 15 2009, 01:39 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(beck_ken @ Sep 15 2009, 01:32 PM)
Wales is part of the United Kingdom if not mistaken
*
so does Scotland and Northern Ireland.. hmmm.. icon_question.gif
vreis
post Sep 15 2009, 01:40 PM

Golden Past Red Future
******
Senior Member
1,658 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: Spion Kop


QUOTE(beck_ken @ Sep 15 2009, 01:32 PM)
Wales is part of the United Kingdom if not mistaken
*
They are but so are Ireland, Scotland, Northern Ireland. so how come only Welsh clubs but not others from those countries?
boxsystem
post Sep 15 2009, 01:45 PM

Legend
******
Senior Member
1,573 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Nilai, Negeri Sembilan
We might see top clubs facing problems in the future. Just when English clubs are challenging at all fronts in UCL. Scudamore is that thick or is he an accomplice of Platini/Blatter?
whoopa
post Sep 15 2009, 01:45 PM

b~o~b~o
*******
Senior Member
7,126 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: in ur base killin your d00dz



i think what they mean by must name 25 players means saying that these 25 players will play in the league ... meaning if more its ok kua .. lol ..
beck_ken
post Sep 15 2009, 01:46 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,716 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


because there's Wales clubs playing at the lower division down there ?

Scotland, Ireland all having their own leagues...Wales clubs playing at the lower division of English league

This post has been edited by beck_ken: Sep 15 2009, 01:49 PM
Everdying
post Sep 15 2009, 01:47 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(vreis @ Sep 15 2009, 01:40 PM)
They are but so are Ireland, Scotland, Northern Ireland. so how come only Welsh clubs but not others from those countries?
*
probably cos there are welsh clubs playing in the english league?
swansea, cardiff, wrexham being the more well known ones...im sure got a few others around.
yhtan
post Sep 15 2009, 01:49 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,653 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: lolyat


QUOTE(vreis @ Sep 15 2009, 01:40 PM)
They are but so are Ireland, Scotland, Northern Ireland. so how come only Welsh clubs but not others from those countries?
*
as far as i remember, Wales is located at South West part of UK, probably its small size and low popularity, and they include it
i remember one of the main capital(Cardiff) club, Cardiff City playing in Coca-Cola Championship?
vreis
post Sep 15 2009, 01:54 PM

Golden Past Red Future
******
Senior Member
1,658 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: Spion Kop


Still Wales got their own league if im not mistaken. Just like TNS? If so, those players from welsh league will be excluded?
chitchat
post Sep 15 2009, 01:54 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


The rules means, each club can only register 25 player max for EPL games next season and 8 of them must be homegrown. Is same like Spanish League only 25 can register but they do not have HG rules there. The rules almost same like Champions League only without the 5 (nation)+3 (club) rules .
leongtat
post Sep 15 2009, 01:58 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
950 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(beck_ken @ Sep 15 2009, 01:46 PM)
because there's Wales clubs playing at the lower division down there ?

Scotland, Ireland all having their own leagues...Wales clubs playing at the lower division of English league
*
You are right...team like cardiff...is one of the good example..
Wan
post Sep 15 2009, 02:26 PM

Glory Hunter
Group Icon
Elite
4,174 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Gua


Means those youngsters not special enough to be considered in the team might not get the chance to play at all if the chance presented itself. Stupid rule. Well done!

And that stupid 90mins rule about signing youngsters in England should be gone by now..
TSblinky
post Sep 15 2009, 02:35 PM

Relax, just trust me.
*******
Senior Member
2,633 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


QUOTE(Wan @ Sep 15 2009, 02:26 PM)
Means those youngsters not special enough to be considered in the team might not get the chance to play at all if the chance presented itself. Stupid rule. Well done!

And that stupid 90mins rule about signing youngsters in England should be gone by now..
*
Theoretically, they can still play in League Cup and FA Cup.
faris21
post Sep 15 2009, 02:50 PM

Newbies
*******
Senior Member
4,453 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: La Masia


Chelsea is the biggest victim as they need find more homegrown next season but the cant sign any player
Wan
post Sep 15 2009, 02:59 PM

Glory Hunter
Group Icon
Elite
4,174 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Gua


QUOTE(blinky @ Sep 15 2009, 02:35 PM)
Theoretically, they can still play in League Cup and FA Cup.
*
What good is that limiting the chances for the youngsters? We fielded a lot of young ones last season against Hull in the last game of the season.

The more I read the more I'm confused. Now they're saying in the 25 man list squad, 8 must be U-21/HG leaving the 17 other spots to those non HG players. But any extra U-21 can be used during the season, something like the CL squad list.. is that right? That would make things better if that's true.

QUOTE(faris21 @ Sep 15 2009, 02:50 PM)
Chelsea is the biggest victim as they need find more homegrown next season but the cant sign any player
*
Not sure they need to buy any players except for strengthening. Their squad is already strong as it is and is a contender every season. Keep the same squad next few years they would still be around the top challenging till the end.

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0179sec    0.46    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 03:50 AM