so proves 18-55mm is very 'cheap' lens?
Photography Nikon D40/D40x/D60/D3000/D5000 V6, Entry Level Digital SLR from Nikon.
Photography Nikon D40/D40x/D60/D3000/D5000 V6, Entry Level Digital SLR from Nikon.
|
|
Oct 29 2009, 10:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#101
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
D5000 body only Rm2.5k, D90 body only Rm3.1k
so proves 18-55mm is very 'cheap' lens? |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 29 2009, 10:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#102
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
|
|
|
Oct 31 2009, 03:52 AM
Return to original view | Post
#103
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
|
|
|
Nov 1 2009, 03:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#104
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
|
|
|
Nov 1 2009, 04:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#105
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
QUOTE(project-o @ Nov 1 2009, 02:18 PM) Would like to add something here. I used to have the hood for the 18-55 kit lens and didn't find it really useful to me I felt it wasn't deep enough to prevent flare. i agree To give my opinion on ne3ro's post very likely he is looking for a better image and better range where I and most of us originally were. I would recommend that he change the kit lens to the 18-105VR first and think of the other options like tele lenses etc later. This will already give a better image in the most useful 18-50 range. Anyway... we can't compare the 18-200 to the 55-200 as they are 2 totally different lenses with different functions. The 18-200 is actually more of an 18-105 + better stabiliser (VRII) + better range and better build quality. Bearing in mind that he is using a D3000 which is similar to the D40/60 in weight the 18-200 is a heavy lens will make your body feel imbalanced and "head heavy". All that said above, will stick to recommending him to change to 18-105 VR first to improve image quality first and add 70-300 VR when he can afford it for tele. 18-105 not only cheap but sharp too, it has better overall IQ on all range compare to 18-200 if want higher focal range then get 55-200 + 18-105 |
|
|
Nov 1 2009, 05:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#106
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 1 2009, 05:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#107
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
|
|
|
Nov 1 2009, 10:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#108
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
QUOTE(dukunet @ Nov 1 2009, 06:49 PM) is it noticeably sharp or just comparing graph? got link? want to buy 55-200 but after reading this, maybe reconsider... comparison graph 18-105 is better, the pics taken by 18-105 is oso sharp throughout 18 to 10518-55 starts to soften from 45 onwards u cant compare 18-105 with 55-200, as 18-105 is almost all-in-1 lens, 55-200 is zoom tele lens I've used my fren's 55-200 n IMO, it is sharper than all-in-1 lenses QUOTE(jsc_tidus @ Nov 1 2009, 08:17 PM) or u could buy the 70-300 which is cost only 400 bucks.. i'm considering this 70-300, 55-200 doesnt impress me much.. if i want a better & (+little bit money) telephoto lens, it would be 70-200 2.8 lens.. the Rm400 70-300 dun have AF motoreven if dun mind manual focus, the optics arent that great the new AF-S 70-300 VR perform far better than it |
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 12:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#109
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
QUOTE(dukunet @ Nov 2 2009, 04:47 AM) is this 18-105 is the d90 kit lense? anyone want to sell? hehe... Nikon got sell 18-105 separately oso, so u dont necessary nid to look for 2nd handAdded on November 2, 2009, 4:50 am so, anybody care to answer my questions above? still thinking want to buy sb600 or di622 or save more for di866. Added on November 2, 2009, 4:52 am i get my d3k in penang for a good price. shop near komtar... forgot its name tho... new 18-105 around 1.1k get either Sb600 or Di866 as these 2 r almost the same price n they have more functions n better performance than Di622 QUOTE(Zi-Tech @ Nov 2 2009, 04:31 PM) if i want to play with cls.... what minimum unit that i must have??? i got budget next year around 1k only is it enough or need to save much more??? Cls minimum 1 unit can dp/s: cant to this weekend.... will go to nikon whole day photography course for d3000 user....hope get more info there... but only flash wirelessly count as cls la but with D40/D40x/D60/D5000 we nid Sb900/Sb800/SU800 only can do cls QUOTE QUOTE(iXora.ix @ Nov 2 2009, 05:27 PM) QUOTE(maxh3h3 @ Nov 2 2009, 05:48 PM) dont have my d40 with me but u can try go menu and search for the flash settings, its dont have commander in d60 so u have to set the wireless flash light power manually before u shoot. your built in flash will pop up and fire in order to activate all the wireless flash.Yes you have to set is slave mode. Do some experiment your self, set your camera flash at the lowest and try use the lights from the wireless if u succeed in getting a nice picture, then u can continue your experiment in getting the right kind of light u want for your pics. good luck Sb600 cannot fire using optical trigger, only radio triggered optical trigger means the flashgun detects camera built-in flash to fire so with D60 without commander built in, u cant fire Sb600 wirelessly unless use commander mode on Sb900/Sb800 or use external wireless commander unit SU800 QUOTE(latias93 @ Nov 2 2009, 11:12 PM) I'm using 18-200VR, but 18-105 better IQ huh.. or get 55-200 + 18-105 as you suggest.. aiya.. takda duit aiyo, if got 18-200 VR d keep laAlso I don't really like the thought of lugging around an extra lens.. especially teles as so heavy le.. I prefer to 'pack light' For me, I prefer flexibility 18-105 & 55-200 combo is for orang miskin la |
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 02:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#110
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
QUOTE(maxh3h3 @ Nov 3 2009, 08:36 AM) there is a way to do wireless flash on d40 as i tried it before in a photography course, but i m not sure how to set it up. Of course a d40 dont have a commander mode to control all the slave. as said by project-o, sb600 only can optical trigger with external 'sensor eye' QUOTE(project-o @ Nov 3 2009, 09:55 AM) Having both the SB-600 and Di-622 I would say that power of both is about the same and the 866 (on paper) is in more in the range of the SB-900. As for the SB-600 with optical trigger, it does work if you add an external "sensor eye". 18-105 + 70-300 is my 'wanted' combo too, but 18-105 + 55-200 combo is for budget limited ppl rite? The 18-200 VR, despite some weak spots, with VR II stabilisation and such a wide range it is a very useful lens and can substitute any lens between 18 and 200 and deliver decent performance. Anyway to me, I feel the combo should be more of 18-105+70-300 (105-450 for DX) rather than 18-105+55-200. the 70-300 adds VRII stabilisation. I used to have both 18-135 and 55-200VR, at the long end, the 55-200 VR isn't that much longer (also taking into account minimal focal distance difference) and is softer in the 135-200 range. Rm3k vs Rm2k |
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 05:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#111
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
QUOTE(iXora.ix @ Nov 3 2009, 05:25 PM) This http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/664128 3rd party battery shud not have problem |
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 06:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#112
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
|
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 06:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#113
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 02:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#114
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
QUOTE(pac1 @ Nov 4 2009, 02:23 AM) D5000 and D3000 are 2 different camera, not just different in functions (live view, video, 2 extra MP), but also different in sensor, D3000 (CCD) vs D5000 (CMOS). D3000 is like D80 brain in D40 body while D5000 is D90 brain in D40 body. Therefore, noise control of D5000 is better than D3000. 'eye' would be a more accurate term, cos brain is the processor If you prefer daylight photograph or into landscape, D3000 gives you more vibrant colours with CCD sensor. While D5000 gives you more flexibility in low-light situation, its color is less saturated and slightly greyish. Just my 2cents. |
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 02:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#115
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
QUOTE(iXora.ix @ Nov 4 2009, 02:08 PM) oh wow.. i now looking for weather proof bags... u can check their website for specifications did lowerpro( forgot the name) bags are weather proof? http://www.lowepro.com/ |
|
|
Nov 6 2009, 12:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#116
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
QUOTE(project-o @ Nov 5 2009, 07:35 PM) sorry, even DX lenses have crop factor on DX bodiesDX lenses is jz have the focal point focused on the center for small crop sensors on FX bodies it'll have high vigenetting on the sides of the pics, or no image at all at the sides |
|
|
Nov 6 2009, 12:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#117
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
|
|
|
Nov 11 2009, 12:02 AM
Return to original view | Post
#118
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
QUOTE(tun @ Nov 10 2009, 11:56 PM) those 3rd party grips can fit, what project-o means is it's not practical to use 1cos D40/D40x/D60 not designed to use battery grip every time u want to use vertical shutter button have to change shutter release mode to remote release |
|
|
Nov 11 2009, 11:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#119
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Nov 11 2009, 03:25 PM) for D3000 & D5000 is different3rd party battery grips utilize the accessory sync terminal for vertical shooting so u dun nid to change release mode n can use the vertical shutter button immediately im using 1 for my D5000 n i recommend D3000 & D5000 users to use it as it is very useful QUOTE(Firdaus92 @ Nov 11 2009, 04:21 PM) Guys, last 2 days i tried D300 with 50mm f/1.4D. Damn the picture produced so cun one! u haven tried Nikon FX series... especially D3... it'll blow your mind away, make u think your D60 is like a toy compare to it QUOTE(andychan @ Nov 11 2009, 05:21 PM) Tamron AF 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 XR Di II latest lenses from Sigma n Tamron now comes with motorTamron AF55-200mm F/4-5.6 Di-II LD Macro did both of this have build in motor? because Nikkor AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II Nikkor DX55-200mm F4-5.6G AFS VR Zoom Nikkor ED Lens is more expensive. need help ^^ i am using D3000 TQ if u want 18-200, y not try save up a bit get Sigma 18-200 OS, it got Optical Stabilizer, which is equivalent to VR |
|
|
Nov 14 2009, 01:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#120
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Nov 13 2009, 05:18 PM) Guys, is this lens good for D3000? And is it sharp? definitely very sharp sharp for such a budget tele lens, n with VR it's usefulNikkor AF-S VR DX 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED My friend is selling it to me, but he asked me to offer him a price.. How much is it worth for 2nd-hand? Thanks a lot as what project-o said, 2nd hand price rm500-600, n u better check everything's working before buying this lens AF tends to get noisier when it ages, noticed by me when use 2 of my fren's this lens, not sure other ppl got this problem or not QUOTE(kennyng @ Nov 13 2009, 06:16 PM) what brand n what class is the memory card?the extra battery is ori Nikon or 3rd party brand? if a reputable class 6 mc + Nikon battery, it'll be Rm2000(D3000 kit) + Rm60-80(good class 6 mc) + Rm170(Nikon battery) = around Rm2200 so the price is quite standard QUOTE(semaynikonian @ Nov 13 2009, 06:35 PM) Hi all, for your budget maybe u can consider some 3rd party brand lensesI just bought my D3000 not more than a week (4days to be exact), bought Body Only for RM1620 and top up RM130 for 4GB, a DSLR bag (cheap one), a tripop and a screen protector... (The screen protector brand DC what RSP is RM199, really expensive, but I dun know whether the price goes like this cause I'm new in this hobby). I'm now having a Nikkor 18-200mm borrow from friend to play around. Actually aiming Nikkor 18-105mm (D90 Kitlens) to fit my D3000 for travelling purpose... Anyone here know where can get 2nd hand cheap?? or anyone here willing to let go theirs?? Pls let me know... Budget is around RM750. I hope can learn something from all the Sifus here.. P/S: Planning to go Bkt Tinggi near Genting tomorrow for Photo Shooting cum outing... Might post some photos for urs comment... I'm really noob in this. This Pic taken 1 hour after I got my D3000. ![]() Comments?? |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0472sec
1.36
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 04:24 AM |