QUOTE(ckmoy007 @ Jun 4 2010, 11:24 AM)
imho, nobelium in comparison with SL60, nobelium has smoother midrange and high, quite neutral and no
listening fatigue. the onli downside for nobelium is lack of midbass due to its lightweight cone. other than that no complaint. my current one that u see in my signature, is on another lvl, it's not a component on its own, i juz mix and match as u can see alpine F#1 + morel. this combo suits my own listening taste. very smooth and warm, for vocal, jazz and slow songs juz superb, for R&B and hip hop not quite there yet.
it makes me(& a few others as well) stick to the sit and keep wanting more. but it's not for everyone's taste, some like it neutral while some like it with more attack.
ah, thats what i am getting with the S60 amp'ed if i play it a little too loud for long periods, after a while the ears would get a little tired and in worse cases a bit of dizziness XD
then again with the midbass down side, which is a problem i am facing, that wouldnt be a good choice for me right? though looking a little back at the smoother midrange, what you're saying that its smooth, however 'weak' due to the lightweight cone it has? Though surely, theoretically it should be better than the S60 by a huge notch right? price and the midbass size in consideration.
wish you'd be in KL so i could try out your system as i am particularly interested in the mix & match modded component set.
Added on June 4, 2010, 11:44 amQUOTE(ckmoy007 @ Jun 4 2010, 11:32 AM)
rears are pointless. at first i didn't believe it, had nobelium for front and SL60 at the back, it's disturbing the staging and stuffs. at first i din realize much, was much of a noob then, haha. when i paid more attention, it is obvious. so i removed and sold the SL60, much better then.
that was my standing back then, heck, i even had the fader maxed to the fronts ignoring the back prior to the amp/sub installation. though i settled for a compromise this time since they had the back somehow hooked to the amp (i think?) because having my faders maxed to the front still had those horrendous rears going, and going fader 0 had every f***ing thing muted oTL
the next time I'm visiting KF audio i am getting those ugly rears removed for good rofl. thanks for reassuring my believes.
Added on June 4, 2010, 11:49 amQUOTE(highway04 @ Jun 4 2010, 11:37 AM)
phases tat i copy out from an article tat i cincai google...
'In a normally wired car stereo, you hear sound coming directly from the speakers and only the speakers closest to you. '
'Time alignment solves this problem and makes it possible to hear sound coming from each of the four speakers at all times regardless of where your head is. It also completely opens up and stops fatiguing/compressing the ears. Details in the music come from space in the car and never from the exact speaker locations - as it should be. '
http://www.decware.com/answer.htmthere u go... previous 2 was about bass from front nt from rear...
and tis link is about TA
thanks for the links you've posted thus far. however the suggestions from the links are treading on dangerous lines here as a lower frequency would result in more obvious rattlings (which i have mentioned for my car) and that would make matters worse than it is.
and again, the problem was not with sound staging at all ^^;
its just the speakers/subs in handling various frequencies altogether.
This post has been edited by Quazacolt: Jun 4 2010, 11:49 AM