i tried it in sony and i dont find it really sharp esp at 300mm...try the 70200 instead!
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V31!, The Orange Legion
|
|
 Sep 27 2009, 11:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
 
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005 
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Sep 27 2009, 11:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Sep 27 2009, 11:44 PM) Yea. Hope can find old set also. (: 3k I sapu straight. (: Maybe with CZ16-80 la. =p i saw someone selling a700+ 50mm 1.8 for RM2999 in PM |
|
|
Sep 27 2009, 11:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
i suggest to stick with alpha coz u have so many gears adi...unless u can sell all of it la...
3k for used a700? i think new quite hard to find adi |
|
|
Sep 28 2009, 06:52 AM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
QUOTE(albnok @ Sep 28 2009, 01:19 AM) hezda: Yes, the 70-300mm G is very good. Sharp wide open with nice bokeh. Hmm...but isnt quite sad when u need sufficient light to see its performance? is it the same for 70200 then? coz when i try 70200, it is much better..maybe 200mm? confused~SpOOkY: I found it sharp at 300mm but you must have sufficient light. Indoors, in a Sony Style/Sony Center, it won't shine. It is also a heck lot sharper than other lenses at 300mm. QUOTE(ianho @ Sep 28 2009, 01:39 AM) Dont forget testing lens inside shops can give u weird results coz of the fluorescent lighting. The flicker can frighten u when u see a rm8000 lens showing a screwed up exposure. lol, i was trying 5dmk2 + 24-105mm in vivo city and a few shots were overexposed.....i assumed that something was wrong with that machine because this is the first time a 5dmk2 let me down   |
|
|
Sep 28 2009, 09:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
QUOTE(hezda @ Sep 28 2009, 08:14 AM) True true... but lens is a very expensive, just to make sure... I know about shutter speed and i shot it at generally high shutter with SSS turned on. It is not considered low light, besides, i even place it on a table....I'll be using it for outdoor shot, I guess this lens won't suitable for wedding...  No money for the 70-200...Thanks... I'll be getting this lens next month or 2, depending on how fast they can get me the stock. Added on September 28, 2009, 8:16 am The longer the end the more it will shake and thus you will need lower shutter speed in low light which will affect quality if you are not using tripod. Besides, you are comparing a FIXED aperture lens with a normal G lens...  |
|
|
Sep 28 2009, 11:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
hmm..maybe i shud try 70300 again ...
hhha Err 99? bad exp eh haha.... |
|
|
Sep 29 2009, 05:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
moo: go for a850 la
|
|
|
Oct 1 2009, 07:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
QUOTE(Braynumb @ Oct 1 2009, 04:54 PM) huhu... I'm abandoning ship into the big "SEA"... wanna join uncle ian... canon? QUOTE(ieR @ Oct 1 2009, 05:25 PM) clivengu; it's a common issue i guess, like me, although not A700, got the excate same backfocus issue, everything behind would be uber sharp while my focused subject is blurred. and i send it twice to sony malaysia, and they declare they fix it, and they DID NOT. not all, some can AFMemorableStudios: are u trying to use DSLR for HD video? pardon me, but isnt DSLR video mode has NO-AF? |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0474sec
 0.89
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 12:21 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.