No where was it ever mentioned there was any transaction taken place. TS only said you ATTEMPTED to cheat her by forcing her to pay an upfront non-refundable payment just to see the unit.

Is this true?

So you're saying you did not pester her nor force her to pay any upfront payment first prior to viewing the premise first?

This means she can view and decide on the unit FREE of CHARGE ?

LOL

Who in their right mind would want to pay any upfront deposit first before viewing the place?

WOULD YOU?

This is an ATTEMPT TO DECEIVE. Note the difference, dum dum

Stop skirting the question

Did you or did you not demand payment first before letting her view the premise?

LOL

This is even worse!!!!

There is no such thing as booking without first viewing and considering and AGREEING to rent. Why should the person be "confident" of your place? Its so good that everyone MUST rent there without even knowing what's it like?

His thread:
http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=1121406&hl=

It is within context, you dimwit.

A deposit of rental shall ONLY be paid if the person agrees to rent your premise. Other than that, you have NO RIGHT to demand payment.

You mean your other tenant paid first BEFORE actually stepping into your place and view the unit?

TS is not a spoilt child, but you are being manipulative and taking advantage of people.

For a start, viewing your premise does not equate to booking it. Understand?

NO!!! YOU DUM DUM!!!

The issue isn't even about renting it. Its about VIEWING it first. You charge people to view it?

Besides, why should one trust you or the student? Just because those students are stupid enough to blindly rent without viewing it, doesn;t mean TS must follow.

How dimwitted can you go?

This post has been edited by happy4ever: Sep 2 2009, 03:13 AM

Look, to view the place is one thing. You don't charge people to view it.

Once when they say 'OK', their words are not officiated unless a deposit has been made, of which in between others can rent it too.
So the normal procedure is to let the prospect view it first, once they agree to rent, a deposit is made, and remainder paid on the day they move in.

Simple, isn't it?

BUT, in your case, you already demand a deposit BEFORE the person gets a chance to step into your premise and view it. Now this is ridiculous!

How about this:

Intention to rent, but your premise is not to their liking?

you mean to say that once viewed, considered rented out?

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAA

Thats even stupid.

If by 11/12 you got the deposit from others, then tell TS don't bother to come.

Simple.

You are being stupid

you don't tell people to pay first before viewing.

All you need to do is to tell them that a lot of people are inquiring the unit and at anytime it could be rented out, no guarantees. Arrange for appointment to view the premise, but in the mean time prior to that date someone made a deposit, then notify the rest to cancel their appointments

FAHAM?

Yea. pitiful isn't it that you're still single all this while

Wait, others are ASKING, no money paid, but you already book for them?

CONTRADICTION?

You see, its not that simple, you see.

actually, its like this, yes and no

Thats because you're being stupid for closing the offer before getting the deposit.

Really? So far you've only demonstrated your incompetence and stupidity in tackling the whole situation.

That doesn't even answer her concern.

My opinion is irrelevant, but your reputation is scarred !

Post 157 has been debunked, Mr Puerile