pasal tu u ada f58..
esok macam mana

i turned it off instead heheheh...quite annoying after sometime

diff class la ...

then they will tell u that A900 has higher MP hehe...
well, i realized that all brands will avoid head-to-head competition one....

millenia3000: were the pics ok?

memory card is less than RM100 (8gb 133X)..hence 3300 is still a better bargain:)

millenia3000: alasan la u...hey i wan ur wireless-flashed-spooked parrot hahhaha

He is waiting :


hey i wana see the national geo. moments (feeding ostrich) one

millenia3000: eh, i got a few 'ok' shots of flying birds but then oh, the back of it is the net..UGLY hahaha...
which one? do u remember the name ar?

nickilala: I made it look scary, but in fact it looked stupid in real life

huh? this ugly bird is also a stork? omg, it is a huge stork....ugly one..

nickilala: I believe A200 can do it with SP90 too

(to me) which is a bad move..i like the way it is in a200...

can try using a blue GND filter too...

speaking about WB, what is the best temp for dawn/dusk? Pics will turn out to be super blue...

lucky that sony AWB is pretty accurate...btw do you shoot under tungsten lights? or u use flash?

---

Added on August 25, 2009, 11:37 amwat ya waiting for?

This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Aug 25 2009, 11:37 AM

sigh....I prefer CF too....

erh...I wonder if they are using the same AF system from A700 or not....

agree, good to have but not a must to have..
yeah, better IQ, and performance is more important to me )

yeap..i think they shudnt have launch it at all

Pics are underexposed,trying using ur histrogram to check the exposure next time(under bright conditions)
Your pic reminded me of this:



dude, ur AWB seems more accurate than your custom WB. if u are shooting under florescent light, i dont get it ....why the WB turns out to be so cold...

eh, sorry din see that u used pop-up flash, try changing ur white balance to "flash" rather than "florescent", also try changing it to 5500k...

This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Aug 27 2009, 12:20 AM

if u want f/2.8 for bokeh then i'd say go get it.

if u want f/2.8 for low light performance as it focusing speed then i'd say go get it.

if u want f/2.8 for low light performance so that you dont have to bump iso or use flash then i'd say dont get it, it will help but not much

hence i would recommend a SAL16105 over tamron 1750 but why?

its a sony lens which produced better colors, contrast, sharpness etc (i assume la, because i dont really fancy 1750 color and contrast) - PP can help but i`m lazy

better range from 16-105....so far, i find that this is the best range that other makes did not make. the closest will be Canon 17-85 and Nikon 16-85.....for RM1.6k u can get a new 16-105 which I find it quite a good buy.....

tamron is known for its front/back focusing issue, i had 1 for 2 weeks only and i sold it off. ,mine had front/back focusing problem too and the seller allowed me to change to a new one, but the seller told me that the problem will resurface after some tear and wear...i duno if its true la, but overall i had a bad exp with this lens....

This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Aug 27 2009, 10:55 AM

haha, i just edited my previous post with sony's adv.
at least i have not heard of any flaws with that lens la, focusing problem, gear stripping or whatever...
afterall, sony lens is made for sony right? less worries ........for that price, its a decent lens to get ....i will take that rather than tammy 1750 at any time....
i havent try that lens yet but some said that it is as good as 1680 CZ. I tried 1680CZ and the contrast/colors are just awesome...(though can be done in PP but come on, do u wana PP all pics?) i would always minimize pp la, else what is the point buying a dslr? (minor ones are ok for me)

If i were to own another APS-c sony, the only lens that i will get is 16105/1680 (price factor )

49mm for your 50mm 1.7? no need to use filter else get a better one

This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Aug 27 2009, 11:00 AM

millenia3000 : getting F42 ??? 2 flashes ar! wow..

anymore bird park pic to share? saw the parrot one, nice but try focusing at the eye instead

how slow is slow for florescent? anything below 50hz shud be good?

---

Added on August 27, 2009, 11:15 amwow 2 flashes in action! cool...

time for a faster tele ar?

This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Aug 27 2009, 11:15 AM