I&P new launching in Temasya Glenmarie @ Shah Alam coming soon...
2- sty - 28' x 70' - bu 2881sf - Indicative price RM1.0 mil
2 sty - 28' x 120' - bu 4800sf - Indicative price 1.6mil-1.7 mil
2 sty - SD - 50' x 90' bu 4,383 sf- Indicative price 2.3 mil-2.4 mil
3 - sty - 52' x 56' (with lift) - bu 4.389sf - Indicative price 1.8 mil

Design for link hses change back to typical I&P design.

Superlink facade
28' x 120' - Building length 80'
28' x 70' Intermediate
52' x 56' 3-storey


This post has been edited by UFO-ET: Feb 25 2012, 02:20 PM

Very odd design. not for asian favorite, I market this type of hse before, very wide & very short, susah!

28' x 70' built up only 2700sf - make up to bout RM347/sf, 28'x120' is still a better buy, I&P is a reputable developer, they will keep their promise. (I think 70% reserved for public balloting, 50% of total units reserved for Bumi quota).
Shah Alam was not famous (for Chinese buyers) in those days (before 2005), but now it's totally change. In Northern SA, we hv SEP and Setia Alam, East - Glenmarie, South - Kota kemuning, Bkt Rimau and Alam Impian, all are doing very well. Only the Pusat Bdr Shah Alam Chinese has hesitation to move in.
Temasya Glenmarie - Non G+G
The quality for coming launching is definitely better than the Phase 1 by Petaling Garden. But facde not nice.

This post has been edited by UFO-ET: Feb 28 2012, 11:34 AM

Ya some people use to mix up "high price" and "expensive price". I personally hv no comment on the Temasya selling price. Vice versa low price does not means "cheap". Wat bout I&P redesign Temasya and sell 2-storey for RM610K (20'x70 bu 1500sf)? Can we say cheap / reasonable?
Given both to choose, I will opt for 28x70 1 mil.

This post has been edited by UFO-ET: Feb 28 2012, 03:32 PM

I think he means wat if he kenot secure 90% loan? If 80% he can't afford, I think I&P will forfeith certain amt of yr deposit, like Alam Impian, deposit 25K, if loan not approve / kenot buy due to low margin, I&P will forfeith 2,500.

SMS sent out by I&P staff, they just want to know how many will go for each balloting (collecting data). Not SPAM

56 x 52 = 20 units was told not for sale this time, BTS concept

Kenot really say SD, I would call it cluster homes...kenot buylah




This post has been edited by UFO-ET: Feb 29 2012, 12:02 PM

Ai..yo.. Who buy house with 1.0 mil hard cash yo?
If you hv 500K cash, you still can buy 1.0 mil 90% loan (provided solid income), buy 100K new sedan and drive carry 300K cash to do business in Ipoh..can?

24' x 80' is definitely a better formation

---

Added on March 4, 2012, 10:47 amVery hard to say, last yr Kinrara Qaseh launching, claimed 1500 registrants for balloting, end up only bout 30 turn up for window shopping, bout 10 enter the balloting...

This post has been edited by UFO-ET: Mar 4 2012, 10:47 AM

The developer is to be blamed, Qaseh launch officially take off right after Mah Sing 3-Storey Superlink launched in 4th quarter 2010, I had hot debate with a Valuer, he claimed that KR is no way to match Qaseh becoz...
1. Leasehold
2. Location less strategic
3. Land size smaller 22'x75' Vs 24'x80' / 26'x80' / 30'x80'
4. Quality / Workmanship - I&P better than Mah Sing
5. Price is too expensive - 908K for 3-storey 22'x75' leasehold (existing Hening 2 1/2 storey freehold 22'x75' was sold at 850K only in 2010)

The Valuer bought 2 units Qaseh. After 1 yr, Qaseh (110 units) price stagnant still while KR Superlink has soared 25% during construction (95% sold / 259 units).
The most killing part for QASEH is the layout design.
If the design is right, better facade and provide fenced (G+G), QASEH can sell at least 10% higher (price) and FULLY SOLD IN A DAY!
Temasya is repeating QASEH's mistake, I doubt it can be fully sold, I guess only 50% take up rate. My 2 bakuli

This post has been edited by UFO-ET: Mar 4 2012, 12:19 PM

Fr my experience, everage people can put in 3 applications. 50K is a small amt to Temasya buyers, I believe many can put 10 applications, unlike the Sri Petaling shops balloting last yr, every contestant is required to place RM500K for 1 application, even though with that high entry barrier, more than 300 applications chasing for the 40 units of shops.
Many cash cows out there, very scary yo...

Since 2000, I entered I&P balloting projects 5 times, never 1 time kena, dunno the process is transparent or not?

This post has been edited by UFO-ET: Mar 7 2012, 11:12 AM

go there kepoh-kepoh oklah...
Just to share my observation, if you want to increase the chance of balloting, dun summit yr application too early, if not yr paper will fall into the bottom of the balloting box, try be the last 30% to summit, I think chances higher yo...
kalau tak kena dun scold me ya...

This post has been edited by UFO-ET: Mar 8 2012, 11:15 AM

I&P always adopt 1 buyer 1 entry system, nothing new this time, in the past, if you need to participate for 10 entries, you need to get 10 names, no transfer of name allow unless spouse / next of kin. Bcoz of that some boss who strike the ballot under the staff's name will hv to joint name buying, later make a full PA to cover it.

I&P shd hv authorization letter, no problem with proxy

Under construction progressive payment interest

Corner SD can buy, quite limited, some people hv studied the locality map, if they want certain "special" unit, then must queue lah

This post has been edited by UFO-ET: Mar 16 2012, 11:22 AM

2.3 mil price is high, but is it expensive? I dun think so. Do study the locality, land are, built up and house quality, it shd be relatively the cheapest new SD in vicinity area

A few years down the road, you will probably change the statement again...
"Property priced above 1.5 mil shd equipped with G+G concept"

You know why? becoz I remembered few years back,
someone has been questioning that why landed property above 600K is without G+G, above 700K without club house and G+G is not worth investing etc etc.
My buyers told me in 1995/6 that paying 500K for a condo in KL is really mad, otak rosak aleli.

I can see their face change in sequence like this over the years...

This post has been edited by UFO-ET: Mar 23 2012, 07:47 PM