Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V29!, The Orange Legion

views
     
Seng_Kiat
post Aug 16 2009, 12:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,580 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(AlphaBeta @ Aug 16 2009, 12:11 PM)
yea i see some noise too..
*
does it normal for A700 produces noise at ISO200???
Seng_Kiat
post Aug 16 2009, 01:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,580 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Aug 16 2009, 01:07 PM)
Alphabeta : Was missing for some time huh?

Everyone : I going KLPF later. Anybody going too?
*
moo, check the price of 50mm 1.8 for me .. biggrin.gif ..
Seng_Kiat
post Aug 16 2009, 04:18 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,580 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
guys,

i am wonder the way i am metering the exposure. is it half press the shutter release is the correct way to meter it? or is there any other method? .. biggrin.gif ..

sorry for noob question but i am searching for this quite sometime d .. biggrin.gif ..
Seng_Kiat
post Aug 16 2009, 05:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,580 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(yuenzhi @ Aug 16 2009, 05:21 PM)
well 16105 image quality is suppose to match CZ 16-80, i dont think its 'slightly' better than kit lens. maybe i'll try shooting again when the sun comes up haha  blush.gif
*
FYI, 16-105 was a kit lens for A700 in europe region (correct me if I am wrong)..

and I dont think the image quality of 16105 matches 1680cz quality .. but of course, it is better than kit lens (18-70 in this case) .. wink.gif ..
Seng_Kiat
post Aug 16 2009, 05:50 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,580 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(yuenzhi @ Aug 16 2009, 05:47 PM)
i think u r right abt the A700 kit lens. it is true that the image quality of 16105 can match up 16-80CZ, the only diff is 16105 has soft corners at wide open. i've read a lot of review and comparison before buying 16105 n thats how i came across so many people saying the image quality between these 2 r almost the same.
*
mind to share your photo taken by 16105? maybe 16105 users have experience in checking the lens problem, etc .. smile.gif ..
Seng_Kiat
post Aug 16 2009, 06:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,580 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Aug 16 2009, 06:14 PM)
Why before photoshopped looks nicer? =p 16105 is much better lo. Sharper and faster. Thats worth the money already.
*
yo moo .. back from KLPF? .. survey the price of 50mm 1.8? .. wink.gif ..
Seng_Kiat
post Aug 16 2009, 06:34 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,580 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Aug 16 2009, 06:27 PM)
I prefer 1st pic le. Er I asked 1 shop forgotten which (=p) the cheapest they can give is 530. So Digitalsmania at Pudu plaze cheaper lo.
*
oo .. thanks btw .. wink.gif ..

how much at digitalsmania? rm520 right? .. hurmm .. keep money first la .. biggrin.gif .
Seng_Kiat
post Aug 17 2009, 07:15 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,580 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(albnok @ Aug 16 2009, 11:47 PM)
Seng_Kiat: Er, you wanted to use Manual Power on the F58 in Aperture Priority on the A700, right? So you need to enable PASM in C04 on the F58.

Yes, DRO makes your pictures noisier! This is especially so when there is bright sky and dark subject.

If you shoot ISO200, and the subject is underexposed by 3 stops, then DRO will brighten the subject by 3 stops (which makes it effectively ISO1600.)

The Canon 40D, Nikon D300, and Sony A700 v4 all have the same image quality and noise levels. It's just whether you used DRO/ADL/HTP or not.

You can accurately spot meter by changing your AEL button to Spot Meter AEL Toggle. So in the case of bright sky and dark subject, press the AEL button while aiming at the subject and you will get a properly exposed, clean image (but overexposed sky.)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
oh, i got it ... biggrin.gif .. at first I tot flash also have semi auto mode like aperture priority, shutter priority, etc .. biggrin.gif .. tongue.gif ..
Seng_Kiat
post Aug 17 2009, 11:26 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,580 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
guys,

do we have alpha photoshoot studio like nikon has their nikonian academy?

another question is, when will the alpha convention? .. biggrin.gif ..
Seng_Kiat
post Aug 17 2009, 12:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,580 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(yuenzhi @ Aug 17 2009, 11:52 AM)
@albnok and hanafinoor - thanks for the comment  laugh.gif

i never knew aperture take a major role in term of image sharpness, i always thought that shutter speed play a more important role in term of producing a sharp image. looks like aperture and shutter speed play an equally important role in order to produce a sharp image. i have one question, if i want to take a landscape picture, my A suppose to be as high as possible ? so that everything will be detailed ?
*
For landscape, I normally use low aperture (high F number like f14 etc) .. It is because high aperture will produce bokeh. thus, it is not good for landscape (only sharp at focusing point)... for landscape shoot, it is important to have a tripod because you will use long exposure (slow shutter speed) to get right exposure .. smile.gif ..

This is one of the example with low aperture and long exposure I snapped a couple of months ago:

user posted image

This post has been edited by Seng_Kiat: Aug 17 2009, 12:17 PM
Seng_Kiat
post Aug 17 2009, 06:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,580 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(achew @ Aug 17 2009, 06:38 PM)
did a few shots for my bro's daughter just now =D been awhile since i last shoot anything "normal"...LOL  c&c r welcome..
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

she is abit camera shy..so well >.<
=)
*
i like it .. the pictures are clean .. sad.gif .. how u do that? shoot in RAW and PP? .. what lens u using for this shoot?
Seng_Kiat
post Aug 17 2009, 06:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,580 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
guys,

as i know, we can trigger flash wirelessly and we can set the channel in flash gun .. so that the other wouldnt trigger our flash ..

i know how to change the channel on flash gun but how do i change the channel in camera? ..


Added on August 17, 2009, 7:00 pm
QUOTE(achew @ Aug 17 2009, 06:57 PM)
Deh~ no prize for u moomooboy...

all the shots were taken with SP90  =)

@sengkiat
yup..RAW + PP....but well..just minor PP...what major PP could u do on a kid anyway..lol..their skin is already flawless  =)
*
oo thanks ..

wow .. sp90 can produce such a good picture .. biggrin.gif . my next target should be sp90 la .. biggrin.gif .. btw, sp90 can be used on FF right (just in case i upgrade to FF in next decade) .. hahaha .. tongue.gif .

This post has been edited by Seng_Kiat: Aug 17 2009, 07:00 PM
Seng_Kiat
post Aug 17 2009, 07:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,580 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(dingenius3 @ Aug 17 2009, 07:30 PM)
marathon-ing myself from page 103  sweat.gif

so wat happening at klpf? last saturday and sunday i went jalan jalan finding brang hantaran...
no time to go to klpf.. adoi..
*
yo din .. long time see .. all old fellas like u, signither are not around since a week ago ..

3 Pages < 1 2 3Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.3910sec    0.57    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 08:09 PM