---

Added on July 3, 2009, 12:33 amanother example of wide angle lens- Tammy 17-50 2.8, not uwa



of coz la this pic have been editted...

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! Good night! *I shall not dream of UWA I shall not dream of UWA I shall not dream of UWA.*

ahemm... that is our photography encyclopedia u talking bout... the sifu albnok! 
u like the bokeh? they are discussing between "tamron sp 90mm f2.8" and " CZ 135mm f1.8" can do
but the DOF too shallow... even the ears are bokeh-fy edi...

going to work now... later i upload the pic 

hi guys,

for kitlens replacement, which of the following i shall get first?

1) CZ16-80 (2nd hand)
2) SAL 16-105
3) SAL 18-200
4) Sigma/Tamron 18-200

thanks

if u fall in love with alpha just buy la bro. later no more a700 in market. or u wanna wait for new alpha.
if u wanna upgrade to nikon jugak i suggest D300.

alpha company..

2moro, there will 3 A700, 2 f58, 1 F42 will be in action in a wedding job at Lunas....

yupp

alpha company..

2moro, there will 3 A700, 2 f58, 1 F42 will be in action in a wedding job at Lunas....

join the club la sifu black... takmo explain ka? go go go 
btw... i haf a fren each using D60, 1000D and E520... me and another fren use A300... 
see... its all comes to 1 point actually... buy what u like... n then love wat u bought edi..

You are so right about the skintone dude.

I had an assistant who shoots with a D90 for a few wedding jobs. The colour is so just vividly weird (or weirdly vivid, or anything that you could use to elaborate the colour). One thing for sure, I dislike the colour reproduction, it's just not natural looking. It might work for creative purposes, but skintone is not pleasing at all. I don't know how much work to do in RAW processing because haven't tried it before. On the other hand... A700 has more natural colour, but still pleasant enough with those creative styles. Only recently that I shoot RAW exclusively and discovered that the RAW produces way way better images.

Most of the time, speaking about colour preferences is solely depends on own taste. But saying that A has better colour than B and C is just not correct.

I have many friends who are 'budget shooters' and shoot with 3rd party lenses, but they're always amazed with my a700+beercan combo (colour, sharpness & bokeh).

Haiyah! You all lucky lar!! The A200/A300/A350 is really cheap. That time I buy the A100 ar... it is the most expensive of the lot leh!! The price is more than the Nikon D40x and the EOS400D leh.

Still I bit the bullet and bought the Sony. Now, no regrets! Hehehehehe.

Now I can even make fun of my Nikon fren cause he bought the SB-900 flash and when I ask him the price he paid, I tell him I can get both the F42 and F58 ady! And some more some people can still say Sony accessories expensive! Dunno where they get them facts from!!

i believe every picture has a story behind it:



the story:

guys..do u guys know where in penang/ northern area can get alpha stuff like studio zaloon?

still waiting for your invitation to teman you to go to sg wang
round one.. coz the front element will rotate while focusing.. it'll look really weird with a petal shaped hood

Yea basically almost all kitlens from any manufacturers. (: kitlens for a200/a300/a350/a700 the same ma. 18-70. a230/a330/a380 only 18-55 SAM.

ur fault.. next time charge up ur shield first la.. aiyoo 
ps: i haf no budget... so no problem la for now~ 
shipped together with round 1... but if u like it to be a drill when focusing... go ahead change it to petal hood.. 

i think moo is right. nikon VR & canon IS kitlens 18-55mm is rotates on focusing. correct me if im wrong.

good morning,,,,...

go alphanatics.....someone sell UWAWA with good price....1.6k........        

any1 going to penang later on or tomoro?got sale..80% off for camera aite?MENARA PERDANA if im not mistaken...hu3..

any1 going to penang later on or tomoro?got sale..80% off for camera aite?MENARA PERDANA if im not mistaken...hu3..