nice OC there ..

template the same except this time clawhammer sudah jadi venice

babyelf, if can hit 330 sure drools lol hehehe..
wait for u san diego screenshot ... man

hehe thnx.. waiting for g.skill now i think can get better time

better this time

more sd/icewater

This post has been edited by Coop: Jun 20 2005, 02:24 PM


Attached thumbnail(s)

lol nice.. can't wait for sandie

Coop, congrats. Great job, the fastest so far. Babyelf! what's the wait..

may i know how to get the best super Pi calculation/ mine is juz about 37.968s....why do i see, most Intel users, dun hav the like...35.xxx....where mine is 37.968? the "titik perpuluhan" i mean....

The answer to your question can be dependent on many factors, check this out and if you have done every tweaks out there, I'm sure you will find the right solutions.

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=49345

It's too difficult to tell. Maybe you didn't close all the services that you don't need? thermal throttling has been activated without you knowing it? Even having wallpaper as your background plus visual styles can be detrimental to your scores. So which one? we don't really know, try those tricks first to see which method of tweaks can give you significant PI time.

ram banwidth is very important on Intels rig. So, lower the multiplier and oc as much as you can with 1:1 setting.

the reason most of the intels user dont have decimal point on their records, is because they oc-ed their proc along time ago, before the SPI mod1.4 released.

for more accurate results, we can fix with SPI mod1.4 from no on. So that we can compare the results of time to time with other forumers.

Evogenix

@babyelf, I had a Venice and the sd is about 1sec faster in 1m Super Pi @Mowgli, SuperPi likes tight memory timings @PCcrazy, thank you. You like my 'dual stage' cooling?

hey coop.. so ur venice @ the same speed?

running a 150 divider now.. might try to run 166 divider with 3.7-3.8v for my bh-5 for benching.. hopefully it'll be able to do it.. i'm thinking 27.9+ will be the max i can go with this venice..

PCcrazy.. wait lar.. hehe.. exams.. sandie is coming to me soon..

and coop.. congrats again is that a PB?

Couln't get more xtreme than that, great stuff. mind borrowing it to me

@babyelf,I don't have the Venice anymore, but yes, speed for speed and same tweaker settings it was about a second diff. PB, yes. @PCcrazy, you probably won't want it now. Here is pic of more normal. **Also, that epox box, has a hole under the cpu with a fan blowing on the back of the cpu area. Did you see the thermal pics of these boards?


Attached thumbnail(s)

ahh ok.. u have a nice sandie now.. hehe don't need the venice eh?



guess what ram?

Basically yes, too many $$$ for both. However, the Venice was a good cpu. I did a 16m Pi with it @3001 and it was easier to run (more stable)at 2.86 to 2938 with just water and no ice than SD. I did have air-con on it at the time though. But still a good cpu, just have one mobo though. Another thing, it was a 3500 so for the, my luck is not so good that I could get a 3000 to be able to run as good as yours or others. Check out air-con pic. It kept my temps down to 26 to 27 as compared to 33 or 34 with just fans. Make a big difference in ability to get higher stable. EDIT** yea, I wish I had some ram that would do 300 too.

This post has been edited by Coop: Jun 23 2005, 11:04 PM


Attached thumbnail(s)

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=24456

later post score

This post has been edited by CHAILEE: Jun 23 2005, 03:32 PM


Attached thumbnail(s)

Here is mine....so so only...how to get better ar?

Here are some Pi's with the Venice I had. 0515 FPAW

This post has been edited by Coop: Jun 24 2005, 05:10 AM