I got 40 sec after closing up all unneccessary program, my system spec is as below. I will later provide proof or might not need one because 40 sec is a bad time.

This post has been edited by PCcrazy: Dec 31 2005, 03:22 AM

my first attempt here on AMD..
running at 257 1:1 @ 4xLDT, 2.5-4-4-8

34 seconds

This post has been edited by PCcrazy: Jan 31 2005, 02:48 AM

quote irenic:
whatever i do, i cant go more than 230htt using this proc + ram at 1:1 .. either i used x11 multiplier or x10..
and 5x ldt only max at 220htt.. more than that must use 4x ldt or lower
my vdimm is 2.85 (the max of my msi neo2)
and yes.. i used 1T all the time.. (coz 2T seems dont have a big diff in oc)
last time i did around 260fsb 1:1 with intel platform, and 245htt with s754 (abit kv8pro)

-----my d43 1T can do 220 only....but 2T confirm 257 at the moment....
still trying to go more....got to pass priming first...

bump myself to top5

here 33sec @ 260 x 10 --- 1:1 ---- 4xLDT, 2.5-4-4-8

yeah i notice that ikanayam...thats why my kingmaxpc3500 @ its max 230fsb(2.5-3-3-6) beat d43 at 255 fsb(3-4-4-8)...im so frustrated that i let go of that kingmax to get d43 at that time..
but lucky i did that cos im on amd64 now...

edit: kingmax able to do PAT while d43 on the contrary...

This post has been edited by PCcrazy: Jan 31 2005, 03:02 PM

is that the max ur RAM can do?...and at wat timing?..

adui...thats a bit sad for AMD64 3500+----i presume ur proc is not a winchester right? but neway thats quite a decent OC..3800++ free of charge...

bump up 1 sec...265htt x 10, 1:1
32 seconds

This post has been edited by PCcrazy: Jan 31 2005, 09:32 PM

Mr ian.ho how bout the RAM---
running at what clock and latency....
btw great time...fuhh...on prommy no wonder 25 sec..

for guys with less hardware power check this at xtreme:

PI tweaks

This post has been edited by PCcrazy: Feb 4 2005, 08:26 PM

calculates PI value to certain decimal places....who calculates the fastest have the greatest rig of em all....

1. arj ~ ClawHammer FX-55(2.8GHz)/OCZ VX ~ 29s
2. pr0di9y ~ Winchester 3500+ (2.8GHz)/OCZ TCCD ~ 30s
2. neuvas ~ Winchester 3200+ (2.6GHz)/ TwinMos UTT ~ 31s
3. Benny Lodewijk ~ Winchester 3200+ (2.62GHz)/Adata TCCD ~ 32s
4. PCcrazy ~ Winchester 3200+ (2.6GHz)?Hynix D43 ~ 32s
5. tAmp0i ~ ClawHammer 3200+ (2.48GHz) ~ 33s
6. jslut ~ ClawHammer 3000+ (2.61GHz)/TwinMos UTT ~ 34s
7. bossnass15 ~ Winchester 3200+ (2.4GHz)/Mushkin TCCD ~ 35s
7. e-jump ~ Winchester 3000+(2.47GHz)/Hynix D43 ~ 35s
8. davidletterboyz ~ NewCastle 3000+ (2.34GHz) /Hynix D43 ~ 37s

I was wonderin why me @ 4th place....it looks like a tie between me and benny.... must be some plot behind this...

wow pc4300...

im really sure u gonna go into 31-32 seconds very soon..
u have the tools bro...raymond is that all ur proc can do?
im sure it can do more...1.56v is nothing really..why dont put some 1.9v there mate....

Nice job of keeping the updates..
Maybe the new miliseconds SuperPI would help u a lot dude..
The top ten competition will be tighter so u dont really have to update that often.....
Looking at the front page, maybe those in the 32 would make the cut just nice.....
Btw thanks for helping me keeping the thread well organized..

Put ur rig under Dry Ice

It is your RAM. Lack of bandwith.
Most of the 32secs is on multi 10. Meaning that they at least run the ram at 260++ frequency with some running tight and some running loose timing.
Tight timing with 1T increases bandwith for AMD64 significantly unlike those of Intels.

Redline series, 3200, 3500 and 4000. I dont know if they are offering other more.

The fastest 939 so far, congrats
Feel the power of SD....

Coop, congrats. Great job, the fastest so far. Babyelf! what's the wait..

The answer to your question can be dependent on many factors, check this out and if you have done every tweaks out there, I'm sure you will find the right solutions.

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=49345

It's too difficult to tell. Maybe you didn't close all the services that you don't need? thermal throttling has been activated without you knowing it? Even having wallpaper as your background plus visual styles can be detrimental to your scores. So which one? we don't really know, try those tricks first to see which method of tweaks can give you significant PI time.

Couln't get more xtreme than that, great stuff. mind borrowing it to me