Evogenix
This post has been edited by Evogenix: Dec 9 2004, 01:11 PM
Attached thumbnail(s)
Lowyat.NET Super PI 1M Top 10 (DDR)
|
|
 Dec 9 2004, 01:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
1,809 posts Joined: Jan 2003   
|
mine 36sec@3.8GHz
Evogenix This post has been edited by Evogenix: Dec 9 2004, 01:11 PM Attached thumbnail(s)
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Dec 16 2004, 12:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
1,809 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
wow nice 27 sec with performance enabled...
COOL~! Evogenix |
|
|
Jan 6 2005, 11:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
1,809 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
agreeeeeE to jarofclay
mine @31sec Evogenix Attached thumbnail(s) 
|
|
|
Jan 10 2005, 01:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
1,809 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
mine bt-j nia.. haizzzzzZZ
Evogenix |
|
|
Jan 10 2005, 01:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
1,809 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
//irenic : y dont try the twinmos premium?? i saw some one bulking it... got a few good reviews also... add a good ram.. then you got a perfect system liao
 Evogenix |
|
|
Feb 8 2005, 10:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
1,809 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
// prancingHORSE : whats your temp when running at 4.29GHz?
Evogenix This post has been edited by Evogenix: Feb 8 2005, 10:41 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 4 2005, 10:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
1,809 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
// bossnass15 :
you copy the wrong time  http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=105812&st=81 Evogenix |
|
|
Apr 12 2005, 07:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
1,809 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
my twinmos 2-2-2-5 @ 2.5GHz
33sec... almost jump into 32sec... arrggg... Evogenix Attached thumbnail(s) 
|
|
|
Apr 12 2005, 08:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
1,809 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
woooooot~!!!!
after 1 hour trying, finally squeeze into 31 sec jugak Twinmos utt AA4T 2x512 @ 260htt 1T @ 1.5-2-2-5 @ vdimm3.5v Evogenix This post has been edited by Evogenix: Apr 12 2005, 08:41 PM Attached thumbnail(s) 
|
|
|
Apr 12 2005, 09:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
1,809 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(jslut @ Apr 12 2005, 08:58 PM) that's pretty good bro but how come u use 1.5-2-2-5 timing??   tried out everything to kick my self to 31 sec coz 2-2-2-5 will give me 32.0xxsec... so, i ma lower summore the timing jee...  hehe Evogenix |
|
|
Apr 12 2005, 09:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member
1,809 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
the 250MHz is using 3.3vdimm
the 260MHz is using 3.5vdimm i even tried 1.5-2-2-0 @ 250htt... got 33.1xx sec in 1M test Evogenix |
|
|
Apr 12 2005, 10:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member
1,809 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
dont need liao...
since my proc already langgar tembok... if hantam vcore lagi... later tembok runtoh then i cham liao.... no proc to use  "hahaha... Evogenix |
|
|
Apr 14 2005, 09:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member
1,809 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(De_Cruelz @ Apr 14 2005, 08:02 PM) Hehe I tried to set CAS 1.5 in A64 Tweaker. System booted straight away should be using the utt... right?Perhaps more burning in will allow that. arj, here I come for 29 secs!  if so, try to set the CL1.5 in BIOS and can go for 16clocks on idle cycle limit tweeke you ram more.. you will get 28/29sec in no time p/s : use the SPI with mili second Evogenix |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 15 2005, 12:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member
1,809 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
well, Idle Cycle Limit have nothing to do with Cas Latency
decressing "Idle Cycle Limit" will lead you get lower time in SPI Evogenix |
|
|
Apr 17 2005, 08:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member
1,809 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
// e-jump :
woot.. nice score you having there oc you proc more... 31sec is waiting for you Evogenix |
|
|
Apr 18 2005, 01:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Senior Member
1,809 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(antonio_zth @ Apr 18 2005, 12:50 PM) tak malu...wanna join plzzzz.... nice job there~!!!  or  or  for you~!!!with nice tweeke you can get a better results... 35-36sec not a problem for you on 2.4GHz Evogenix Attached thumbnail(s) 
|
|
|
Apr 18 2005, 03:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Senior Member
1,809 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
you have to do more tweeking on your ram...
use a software named A64 tweeker <-- google... you will found it and try to find SPI mod1.4 that got mili sec like mine... With the SPI mod1.4, you will know how far you away from the 35/36sec border Non stop trying with different setting is the key word to get better results good luck, Evogenix |
|
|
Apr 19 2005, 07:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Senior Member
1,809 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(antonio_zth @ Apr 19 2005, 11:53 AM) which version issit??? normally, i use A64 tweeker v0.6bA64 tweaker =? version but you can try other version eg 0.31 or 0.5x see which 1 better for your board Evogenix |
|
|
Apr 24 2005, 09:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
Senior Member
1,809 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
yeeha~!!!
let me FIRE up this thread again tested with sse2 patched SPI [since alot ppl using it] PI's time decressed to 30sec... rank up again 2.60GHz @ 2x 512 TwinMOS UTT[ch-5e] @ 2-2-2-5 @ 3.6vdimm // sniper : time to hantam your tornado into your RIG again LOL~!!! Evogenix This post has been edited by Evogenix: Apr 24 2005, 09:14 PM Attached thumbnail(s) 
|
|
|
Apr 24 2005, 09:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
Senior Member
1,809 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
nope...
it can benchmark without a problem.. but long run.. ahem* TOTALLY DEAD XD Evogenix |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.1214sec
 0.68
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 06:06 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.