On behalf of the law grads... I think most of us don't behave like TS and most of us are proficient in English so next time TS try to reconfirm everything in a language understood by both and not just a single party (not to say I think you're wrong for asking him to give u back what was originally agreed upon). Anyways, crxr, next time try to be more subtle when you give a "predictive" date or time. Cause if you broke my 2nd hand or 3rd hand anything and keep ffk-ing me, I think I'll sue you. I mean this in the nicest way. Cause in trade a promise should be acted upon.


Crxr:
I'm tech-illiterate but I think if it were 2nd hand it could have latent problems but it is rather lame to blame it all on latent defects and deny all responsibilities. Just admit that there is a possibility of such action on your part that caused this damage but explain that there is also a possibility that there are latent defects from the phone AND ALSO that you ARE paying back for the damage in part (due to the endless possibilities of ifs and maybes) but it would be harsh to expect you to completely reimburse a 2nd hand iphone (of which condition is dubious in the first place).

Anyways, I supposed both of you have already reached an amicable solution. But TS please bear (and to all the thread readers it's not "bare" i mean it with the best intentions) with the possibility of a further delay due to the logistics of delivery (I really think crxr should plead tis before just conveniently profess to be able to deliver on time).

Cheers!